Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > JetBlue
Anyone else getting concerned? >

Anyone else getting concerned?

Search

Notices

Anyone else getting concerned?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-30-2023 | 12:53 PM
  #11  
RemoveB4flght's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by upup89
Yes it would have to be voted on by SAVE shareholders. JetBlue management would be negligent to over pay so badly for Spirit with its current issues and long term path to profitability.
Again, JetBlue is not buying Spirit’s operation, they are buying its staff and assets, the value of which have not changed. Spirit could be profiting massively or hemorrhaging money and it would not make any difference as the business model will cease to exist. If you want to argue that grounded NEO’s would be less valuable, a good portion of the fleet would need to be grounded to refit and repaint at some point anyway, and the recompense from Pratt for the operational impacts would transfer to JetBlue anyway.
Reply
Old 10-30-2023 | 01:15 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0
From: 320 F.O.
Default

Originally Posted by RemoveB4flght
Again, JetBlue is not buying Spirit’s operation, they are buying its staff and assets, the value of which have not changed. Spirit could be profiting massively or hemorrhaging money and it would not make any difference as the business model will cease to exist. If you want to argue that grounded NEO’s would be less valuable, a good portion of the fleet would need to be grounded to refit and repaint at some point anyway, and the recompense from Pratt for the operational impacts would transfer to JetBlue anyway.
Agreed it is an asset /aircraft required staffing /training center purchase nothing more.
Reply
Old 10-30-2023 | 01:40 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 257
From: A320 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Flyhayes
Spirits plan is/was to have 297 airplanes by 2027. For us to purchase new airplanes, we would spend nearly 30 billion. Granted, planes lose value etc, so the replacement cost isn't very accurate.
there is also the huge cost opirtunity to get their order book and not have to go to the back of the line.
this also doesn't include the cost opportunity of instantly getting the pilots and training center. Even at what we are paying, I think we are getting a phenomenal deal.
Correct. This deal is about pilots and airplanes, everything else is gravy. Also one less ULCC and hideous yellow liveries is a public service.
Reply
Old 10-30-2023 | 01:58 PM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2023
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: Seeking 121
Default

Wasn't the main point of the deal to get western routes and slots?
Reply
Old 10-30-2023 | 02:01 PM
  #15  
Flyby1206's Avatar
SDQ Base Chief
20 Years
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,089
Likes: 48
From: 320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by 121noob
Wasn't the main point of the deal to get western routes and slots?
No, JB has been pretty open about needing planes/pilots so they can expand. Sure some of that expansion will probably be west of BUF, but NK doesn't hold some sacred route authority or valuable slot portfolio out west. JB isn't interested in the NK customer base, brand, or business model.
Reply
Old 10-30-2023 | 05:14 PM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2022
Posts: 1,372
Likes: 141
Default

Originally Posted by Climbto450
Agreed it is an asset /aircraft required staffing /training center purchase nothing more.
Yep. Planes, real estate, and people. None of that has changed. If JB backs out they risk spirit finding another partner, restructuring and going it alone, or getting chopped into pieces of which JB may only be able to buy a fraction of what they want with the balance being split among other carriers.

If the DOJ wins both Spirit and JB are in very dire straits. Spirit more so than JB though. Needless to say I’m updating my logbook when I thought I’d be retiring from this airline. The next 2 months will be a big turning point.

The DOJ needs to take their ball and go home and just leave us alone.
Reply
Old 10-30-2023 | 05:50 PM
  #17  
todd1200's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,049
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by Roy Biggins
Does anyone know for certain what type of interest rate JB is paying on this loan? They secured it years ago, so it seems possible they locked in a low rate when they initially got the loan?
The interest rates are in the the Bridge Facility.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d...7786dex991.htm

This one may have been superseded? I can't remember the date of the most recent one. This one quotes SOFR plus between 3% and 4.5%. So somewhere around 8 - 10% as of now, but it will fluctuate.

This is just the bridge to get through the first year. I guess that gives them time to negotiate longer term financing? I dunno how these transactions usually work.
Reply
Old 10-30-2023 | 07:30 PM
  #18  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 919
Likes: 27
Default

Originally Posted by 121noob
Wasn't the main point of the deal to get western routes and slots?
Just to be clear, there are only 3 slot controlled airports in the US.

JFK, LGA, and DCA.

The issue is gate access/infrastructure in non-slot controlled airports.
Reply
Old 10-31-2023 | 04:35 AM
  #19  
los74's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Default

With the $141 million loss (probably higher) in Q3 which includes August and September there is plenty of room to be concerned. B6 is posting losses 3 out of the 4 quarters. B6 is having the financial phone call via web as a listen only, so no questions allowed from investors. In three months B6 has lost 66% of share value which says the investors do not trust or have realized B6 is full of it and they are leaving the building. B6 always blames the weather, the NE, the E-190 and the everything else except the lack of competent people running the show and the horrible operations B6 runs. What load factor does B6 need to have to make a profit? The planes are almost full which means B6 needs about 100% load factor to make money. Historically airlines need to have a load factor of 60% to make a profit. The story that we operate out of the NE is old news and B6 decided to operate out of the NE so figure it out. All carriers operate out of the NE so B6 is not alone. The E190 excuse is also old news and those that are paid for should be used until there are enough A220s with the major mechanical issues with this airplane solved. Probably the most important thing is that B6 needs real new management and exterminate many unnecessary management positions to become lean and efficient.
Reply
Old 10-31-2023 | 05:06 AM
  #20  
The REAL Bluedriver
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 6,935
Likes: 0
From: Airbus Capt
Default

Originally Posted by los74
With the $141 million loss (probably higher) in Q3 which includes August and September there is plenty of room to be concerned. B6 is posting losses 3 out of the 4 quarters. B6 is having the financial phone call via web as a listen only, so no questions allowed from investors. In three months B6 has lost 66% of share value which says the investors do not trust or have realized B6 is full of it and they are leaving the building. B6 always blames the weather, the NE, the E-190 and the everything else except the lack of competent people running the show and the horrible operations B6 runs. What load factor does B6 need to have to make a profit? The planes are almost full which means B6 needs about 100% load factor to make money. Historically airlines need to have a load factor of 60% to make a profit. The story that we operate out of the NE is old news and B6 decided to operate out of the NE so figure it out. All carriers operate out of the NE so B6 is not alone. The E190 excuse is also old news and those that are paid for should be used until there are enough A220s with the major mechanical issues with this airplane solved. Probably the most important thing is that B6 needs real new management and exterminate many unnecessary management positions to become lean and efficient.
The 60% load factor to break even is a very old rule of thumb based on an entirely different revenue management system. Irrelevant now for any large airline.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Halon1211
Spirit
5
01-11-2023 04:50 AM
KirillTheThrill
Aviation Technology
1149
03-21-2022 05:21 AM
dvhighdrive88
Major
38
02-11-2008 08:10 PM
iahflyr
Regional
44
01-17-2008 10:58 AM
ADIRU
Major
13
06-07-2006 12:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices