![]() |
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 3815576)
I’d imagine it would be only the mid morning LAX 7am-9am departures that would be operated as turns. If there was a massive delay it would be relatively easy to recrew the return leg before the 1st flight landed.
I doubt you see JFK-LAX-JFK turns for the airspace/delay reasons you mentioned. That return leg LAX-JFK would be a doozy |
Originally Posted by ARL120384
(Post 3815592)
I agree there. FL turns would be a little less of a mess given there generally shorter duration. I have heard that either DL or UA tried this in the past and it didnt last too long.
|
Originally Posted by PSU Flyer
(Post 3815603)
But, is a circle really the best shape for a wheel? Let’s try and reinvent it. We’re smarter than everyone else.
|
Originally Posted by ARL120384
(Post 3815613)
Hey, if its a tactic they're trying to save money, its worth a shot.
Our leadership pats themselves on the back for "disrupting the airline business model" whether it works or not. We keep trying to go against the grain, hence his "reinvent the wheel" expression. We'll come up with some idea and work out 80% of the kinks, then we hope that our culture will make up for the lack of planning and preparation; in other words that our front-line people will figure out the other 20% on the fly, and the crazy idea will make us the big winners in the airline world. |
Originally Posted by ARL120384
(Post 3815613)
Hey, if its a tactic they're trying to save money, its worth a shot.
I’ll tell you how to save money. Spend a bit of money to teach the gate agents how to operate the jet bridge and you’ll save a bunch of money in fuel costs. |
Originally Posted by PSU Flyer
(Post 3815718)
Locking the Mint suite doors open saves money. How do you feel about that one?
I’ll tell you how to save money. Spend a bit of money to teach the gate agents how to operate the jet bridge and you’ll save a bunch of money in fuel costs. If we can't figure that out... |
Originally Posted by Flyby1206
(Post 3815575)
it would increase pilot productivity and reduce staffing requirements. Probably help LAX maintain 1-day pairing requirements per the CBA.
|
Originally Posted by CareerPivot
(Post 3816960)
I believe we only need to have 5% one day pairings, right? So with 25 departures a day, that's only about 1 trip per day and we're currently running SLC and SJD, so I don't see how/why have an augmented 1 day double transcon would make sense. Am I missing something?
|
Every JetBlue flight has to touch NYC, Boston, or San Juan. That's the winning plan.
|
Originally Posted by Boomer
(Post 3817020)
Every JetBlue flight has to touch NYC, Boston, or San Juan. That's the winning plan.
I mean why NOT put all your eggs in one basket...that way when ATC shortages disproportionately effect you can say It's out of your control.......I mean sounds much better than "Gee we suck, and we should have better contingency planning by diversifying our network"...............if only there were numerous consultancy groups and a pilot group who had screamed this for years. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:45 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands