Search

Notices

EWR engine fail RTF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-20-2026 | 03:45 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 204
Likes: 1
Default EWR engine fail RTF

Kudos to the crew for handling ghe emergency and getting everyone on the ground and evacuated safely! My question is given the crew reported smoke in the cockpit then cabin would it have been prudent to cut the bleeds before the smoke started to prevent it from occurring in the first place? In other words engine damage/fire should have a memory item BLEEDS/PACKS OFF. My thinking on this was if we are having to contend with APUs dumping smelly cancer socks into the air system and we turn the packs/bleeds off right away why no do the same to lfor eng damage/fire? Even for perhaps engine surging.
Reply
Old 02-20-2026 | 04:12 AM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 234
Likes: 1
Default

Good question. I’d pose it the CKA/Fleet CA. I know this, at THIS airline you better not do **** that’s NOT written in black and white in our manuals!
Reply
Old 02-20-2026 | 05:24 AM
  #3  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 739
Likes: 22
Default

Did the engine fail as in flameout or did it eat itself?

Now I haven’t read the light/switch guide in a while but I stayed at one of our luxurious holiday inn express last night….the fire light switch isolates the problem doesn’t it? Which one of those steps it does so is closing the bleed.
Reply
Old 02-20-2026 | 05:29 AM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 204
Likes: 1
Default

When you hit the FIRE button on ENG it

Silences Aural warning

Arms Squibs (Squib light turns ON)

Deactivates generator

FADEC power removed

Closes:

FUEL LP valve

Hyd Fire SOV

Engine Bleed

Pack Flow Control

Im guessing the smoke started while the crew was flying the plane first before they started MEMORY items and ECAM actions. Then in theory when they hit the FIRE buttons the smoke dissipated somewhat as the bleed on the damaged engine was cut.
Reply
Old 02-20-2026 | 05:32 AM
  #5  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 204
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Combatcraig
Good question. I’d pose it the CKA/Fleet CA. I know this, at THIS airline you better not do **** that’s NOT written in black and white in our manuals!
Not sure whats in your checklists but are you saying that had Sully worked for B6 instead of US AIR he would have been doing the waltz on the carpet after the water landing and such for turning on the APU(?) despite it not being in the checklists?
Reply
Old 02-20-2026 | 06:02 AM
  #6  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 739
Likes: 22
Default

Originally Posted by FAR121
Not sure whats in your checklists but are you saying that had Sully worked for B6 instead of US AIR he would have been doing the waltz on the carpet after the water landing and such for turning on the APU(?) despite it not being in the checklists?
yeah Mike O’Malley was pretty ****ed about that one….me must have roamed the halls of OSC at one time

saves a cycle on the APU too…so now you can bring an extra pair of socks and underwear because it’s cost neutral….jetfoward
Reply
Old 02-20-2026 | 06:11 AM
  #7  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 426
Likes: 27
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by FAR121
Kudos to the crew for handling ghe emergency and getting everyone on the ground and evacuated safely! My question is given the crew reported smoke in the cockpit then cabin would it have been prudent to cut the bleeds before the smoke started to prevent it from occurring in the first place? In other words engine damage/fire should have a memory item BLEEDS/PACKS OFF. My thinking on this was if we are having to contend with APUs dumping smelly cancer socks into the air system and we turn the packs/bleeds off right away why no do the same to lfor eng damage/fire? Even for perhaps engine surging.
According to ATC audio, it sounds like the crew had a compressor stall. There's no memory item for this or an engine FIRE/FAILURE. Do us all a favor and save your speculation until the investigation is complete.
Reply
Old 02-20-2026 | 07:52 AM
  #8  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 403
Likes: 54
Default

Originally Posted by FAR121
Kudos to the crew for handling ghe emergency and getting everyone on the ground and evacuated safely! My question is given the crew reported smoke in the cockpit then cabin would it have been prudent to cut the bleeds before the smoke started to prevent it from occurring in the first place? In other words engine damage/fire should have a memory item BLEEDS/PACKS OFF. My thinking on this was if we are having to contend with APUs dumping smelly cancer socks into the air system and we turn the packs/bleeds off right away why no do the same to lfor eng damage/fire? Even for perhaps engine surging.
It’s an engine oil seal leak more than likely. Usually always is.
Reply
Old 02-20-2026 | 08:05 AM
  #9  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 426
Likes: 27
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by STIorSTD
It’s an engine oil seal leak more than likely. Usually always is.
I thought it was APU oil overservicing?
Reply
Old 02-20-2026 | 02:14 PM
  #10  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 204
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by ARL120384
I thought it was APU oil overservicing?
Either way in theory would it make sense to turn off the affected engine/apu bleed source to prevent smoke from coming in?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KennyG1700
Flight Schools and Training
40
08-01-2019 12:53 AM
AirbusPTC
Engineers & Technicians
10
03-15-2019 07:36 AM
2StgTurbine
Technical
32
10-30-2015 12:24 PM
CAL EWR
Major
16
08-23-2009 06:26 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices