Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Pilotless planes could save airlines billions >

Pilotless planes could save airlines billions

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Pilotless planes could save airlines billions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-2017, 06:33 PM
  #11  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Position: CFI
Posts: 88
Default

Originally Posted by pilot0987 View Post
Not sure where they are getting all this fuel savings from. 1 billion in fuel savings. If the time ever did come for pilotless stuff they would not be able to fly direct rather entire routes costing more money.
I honestly wish CNN, Fox, MSNBC, etc would just hire someone from the aviation industry who has actual experience instead of someone who has absolutley no idea what they are talking about. My friend sent me this article saying "well look who will be out of a job in the next 10 years" when in reality it couldn't be farther from the truth. The general public has no idea about the logistics, regulations, and economical implications this would have. All they really know about the aviation industry is that they get on a plane that goes up into the sky and magically lands at they're destination.

sorry for going a little off topic,

Rant Over
jdebrey is offline  
Old 08-07-2017, 06:43 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,120
Default

Originally Posted by Dised101 View Post
You and I know how important our services are. But, the fact is pilotless aircraft are already flying. The technology to have pilotless aircraft is "off the shelf" technology. Nothing has to be developed from an aircraft perspective.
What off the shelf technology are you referring to? Which company or supplier has this ready to go? Do you have ANY idea of the mishap rate for these "off the shelf" systems you are talking about, or any concept of how much it costs to scale those systems? Do you understand the expense behind lofting a couple hundred more satcom birds or putting up a couple million ground transceivers to handle the necessary high bandwidth datalinks? KU won't handle it, not enough frequencies available. So add in the cost of a new satcom spectrum, waveform, and of course standards...

The barriers to this are enormous. Not saying it won't happen eventually, but... Really? "Off the shelf"? No way, not even close, unless you're talking about an operation limited to a handful of flights per day flying people who don't mind dying on routes over people on the ground who also don't mind dying.
flensr is offline  
Old 08-07-2017, 08:09 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Default

Originally Posted by 123494 View Post
I don't take anything from the media seriously.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 08-07-2017, 08:17 PM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
Dised101's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 54
Default

Originally Posted by flensr View Post
What off the shelf technology are you referring to? Which company or supplier has this ready to go? Do you have ANY idea of the mishap rate for these "off the shelf" systems you are talking about, or any concept of how much it costs to scale those systems? Do you understand the expense behind lofting a couple hundred more satcom birds or putting up a couple million ground transceivers to handle the necessary high bandwidth datalinks? KU won't handle it, not enough frequencies available. So add in the cost of a new satcom spectrum, waveform, and of course standards...

The barriers to this are enormous. Not saying it won't happen eventually, but... Really? "Off the shelf"? No way, not even close, unless you're talking about an operation limited to a handful of flights per day flying people who don't mind dying on routes over people on the ground who also don't mind dying.
The fact is, the military is already doing it. R and D already has taken place. That it the biggest cost. Any costs you have mentioned will be weighed against savings. The industry will defer some of those costs to the government in the form of ATC reform. Management will always view labor as an expense and not an asset. And the flying public could care less. As long as they Save a dollar on a ticket....
Dised101 is offline  
Old 08-07-2017, 08:28 PM
  #15  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 154
Default

Ill be on the beach or sailing on my sailboat drinking a margarita by the time pilotless planes come around... so im not worried
NYGiantsFan is offline  
Old 08-07-2017, 08:44 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Position: A320
Posts: 195
Default

Not gonna happen in a long time. They can't even do automated cars and maybe they never will be able to. Machines plainly suck for the most part. My laptop still crashes and my phone freezes. Siri is practically useless. Trains aren't automated except for very short rides ( like between airport terminals) etc. All these new planes like the A350 for example are all created to be flown by 2 pilots. Even future designs are going to require 2 pilots. I remember seeing this same article (minus the pilot shortage part) like 7 or 10 years ago. This is just a fantasy that the rich elite have, kind of like transhumanism, where they think the brain is a computer and they can live forever by downloading their brain into a computer. Just a rich mans wet dream, they aren't as smart as they think they are or as smart as they tell us they are. Never gonna happen, keep flyin folks!
wilco811 is offline  
Old 08-07-2017, 08:56 PM
  #17  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Position: CFI
Posts: 88
Default Pilotless planes could save airlines billions

Originally Posted by wilco811 View Post
Not gonna happen in a long time. They can't even do automated cars and maybe they never will be able to. Machines plainly suck for the most part. My laptop still crashes and my phone freezes. Siri is practically useless. Trains aren't automated except for very short rides ( like between airport terminals) etc. All these new planes like the A350 for example are all created to be flown by 2 pilots. Even future designs are going to require 2 pilots. I remember seeing this same article (minus the pilot shortage part) like 7 or 10 years ago. This is just a fantasy that the rich elite have, kind of like transhumanism, where they think the brain is a computer and they can live forever by downloading their brain into a computer. Just a rich mans wet dream, they aren't as smart as they think they are or as smart as they tell us they are. Never gonna happen, keep flyin folks!


Sums things up perfectly. If you want a laugh check out this article.

The telegraph is telling people that they could fly on a pilotless commercial airliner within 10 years.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/...itude-36000ft/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
jdebrey is offline  
Old 08-07-2017, 09:08 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2016
Position: A320
Posts: 195
Default

Hey, this Telegraph article is pretty much identical to the OP's CNN article. Two authors, two different magazines but same content at the same time? Seems like these media outlets are all owned by the same people and following a script, trying to get a certain narrative across. Like I said, just a rich mans wet dream, not gonna happen! They can keep dreaming all they want but the human brain is far superior than any machine. These people behind these articles are complete psychopathic delusional nutjobs.
wilco811 is offline  
Old 08-07-2017, 09:16 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Half wing's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: 787 right
Posts: 504
Default

Not going to happen for a long, long time. CEO of Boeing said pilotless planes not before 2060. Too many glitches when the feces hits the fan. How about we work on reliable wifi to Hawaii first.
Half wing is offline  
Old 08-07-2017, 10:07 PM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
HueyHerc's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: L-382, Left/Right
Posts: 36
Default

There will always be a pilot...the only difference is he or she may not be in the aircraft. Look at the USAF Global Hawk high altitude drone. Launch team in theater, mission control team in the US, recovery team. Data link hand off, crew swaps etc. You will still have requirements for training, currency, crew rest, crew day, etc etc. These pilots will want to be paid for their services just like the ones who actually go along for the ride. Add in all the techies for data links and satellite comm requirements and you are right back where you started.
HueyHerc is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
vagabond
Aviation Law
2
12-10-2010 06:56 AM
Sir James
Major
1
10-09-2005 06:08 PM
Sir James
Major
1
07-17-2005 08:47 PM
WatchThis!
Major
0
07-10-2005 03:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices