Search
Notices

[Breeze] Airways

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-18-2019, 06:15 PM
  #221  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Position: GUFN
Posts: 74
Default

Originally Posted by CrowneVic View Post
"...the carrier likely will be based near a technology center other than Silicon Valley."

Austin? Dallas? Raleigh? Dulles?
How about SEA? Or is it gate poor? Maybe they could merge/acquire Alaska and get two for one - gates and a developed west coast market.
GUFN is online now  
Old 06-19-2019, 05:50 AM
  #222  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by David Puddy View Post
Moxy has 60 firm orders for the A220/CS300 but will do a “sale and leaseback” transaction with a big lessor for the first 9 - this is a standard transaction for providing additional liquidity up front. Here’s the article talking about the leasing transaction:

https://worldairlinenews.com/2019/06...ZeWKYkY5SOnSv4

Regarding Austin, nobody external to the business knows the route structure yet. All we know is that evidently many, many cities in secondary and tertiary markets have reached out to Moxy begging for airline service. There are many non-hub dots with 100,000+ people that could be connected on the map. Should be very interesting to watch and I hope we continue to get more information soon...
I would only call it a standard transaction for a company lacking liquidity.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 06-19-2019, 08:15 AM
  #223  
Swimmin' in da pool
 
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 444
Default

So...I take it you disagree...?

In just two short sentences you were able to mix 2 religious terms with a vulgar sex act. Such talent.

Keepin' it classy on APC. Thanks for the visual and reminding me why I quit reading this forum.

Last edited by tomgoodman; 06-19-2019 at 12:35 PM. Reason: Quoted inappropriate language
dawgdriver is offline  
Old 06-19-2019, 08:28 AM
  #224  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,067
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
I would only call it a standard transaction for a company lacking liquidity.
Nope.

This is SOP for all lease transactions. It is free / low cost financing that every CFO will leverage.
TFAYD is offline  
Old 06-19-2019, 10:07 AM
  #225  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: Left
Posts: 1,807
Default

Originally Posted by TFAYD View Post
Nope.

This is SOP for all lease transactions. It is free / low cost financing that every CFO will leverage.
Completely agree. This is a standard financial tool/transaction.
David Puddy is offline  
Old 06-19-2019, 10:13 AM
  #226  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by TFAYD View Post
Nope.

This is SOP for all lease transactions. It is free / low cost financing that every CFO will leverage.
It’s certainly not free or low cost. There are various reasons to sell and leaseback airframes but it’s usually about liquidity. Look at Norwegians actions the last few years.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 06-19-2019, 10:17 AM
  #227  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,504
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
I would only call it a standard transaction for a company lacking liquidity.
Flying leased aircraft is NOT uncommon.

Of Delta’s 91 B717s they own 3 and lease 88.

In total they lease 198 and own 687.



https://www.delta.com/us/en/about-de...te-information
Excargodog is offline  
Old 06-19-2019, 10:32 AM
  #228  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog View Post
Flying leased aircraft is NOT uncommon.

Of Delta’s 91 B717s they own 3 and lease 88.

In total they lease 198 and own 687.



https://www.delta.com/us/en/about-de...te-information
I never said it was uncommon. It’s very common to lease aircraft for many reasons. You might want them for a defined period of time, there may be tax implications or it might be a great deal. Purchasing a airframe and then selling it is far less common and generally is about liquidity.
In the case of the DL717’s the leases were heavily subsidized at below market rates.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 06-19-2019, 11:27 AM
  #229  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 648
Default

Originally Posted by dawgdriver View Post
So...I take it you disagree...?

In just two short sentences you were able to mix 2 religious terms with a vulgar sex act. Such talent.

Keepin' it classy on APC. Thanks for the visual and reminding me why I quit reading this forum.
You're offended by two common English statements? Shocking.
ChecklistMonkey is offline  
Old 06-19-2019, 01:07 PM
  #230  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,067
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
It’s certainly not free or low cost. There are various reasons to sell and leaseback airframes but it’s usually about liquidity. Look at Norwegians actions the last few years.
It is typically lower cost than issuing a bond or getting a loan.

Of all financing options out there it is one of the cheapest cost of capital.
TFAYD is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frisky Pilot
Regional
20
01-01-2022 05:02 PM
Drums4life
Regional
107
08-16-2011 11:21 PM
ryane946
Major
25
03-06-2007 08:53 PM
RedBaron007
Major
3
01-31-2007 09:05 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
03-07-2005 11:04 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices