|
Originally Posted by Itsajob
(Post 3012556)
Does a regional apply directly to the government for funds, or does that money go to the parent company since they own the flying to be used to cover the network as they feel necessary? If that money went directly to United, would the furlough protections include a regional that was contracted to cover certain routes?
|
Originally Posted by Itsajob
(Post 3012556)
Does a regional apply directly to the government for funds, or does that money go to the parent company since they own the flying to be used to cover the network as they feel necessary? If that money went directly to United, would the furlough protections include a regional that was contracted to cover certain routes?
https://www.documentcloud.org/docume...CARES-ACT.html |
Originally Posted by PaloAlto
(Post 3012518)
it’s not playing politics, it’s making sure proper labor protections are included in this bill, and making sure it isn’t yet another corporate welfare check that puts no responsibility on upper management.
Sat what ? Then why did it pass on both sides by 100%, if Congress is just going to reject it? I do not get what your trying to say. |
Originally Posted by Intrdmnslalien
(Post 3012394)
This ain't the time to play politics.
|
Originally Posted by Aero1900
(Post 3012539)
The bill passed with every single senator voting yes. 100% bipartisan support.
|
Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
(Post 3012683)
Not true. Mike Lee and Rand Paul did not vote for it.
|
Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
(Post 3012683)
Not true. Mike Lee and Rand Paul did not vote for it.
|
Bailout - Deal has been agreed upon.
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3012684)
Correct. Nobody voted against it (that would come back to haunt you), a couple abstained.
Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
(Post 3012683)
Not true. Mike Lee and Rand Paul did not vote for it.
They are self quarantined, and therefore absent. Along with Romney. |
Originally Posted by Aero1900
(Post 3012731)
They are out sick. No one voted against it. That's unanimous support.
|
A quick PDF search does not find the terms: Major Carrier. Carrier is defined under Part121 and a search for 135 shows only a page number. From this I gather that regional carriers who supply scheduled service under Part 121 are covered and "on-demand" air carriers under part 135 are not covered. Essential Air Service was a pdf search and mention so a 135 operator who provides essential service may be covered. I didn't read all of it. It was time for dinner, I will delve into it deeper later.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:23 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands