Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Retirement age 67

Old 05-12-2022 | 11:15 AM
  #21  
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
Furloughed Again?!
15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,950
Likes: 110
From: Boeing 737
Default

Originally Posted by ReadOnly7
For many who got screwed by Age 65…..this actually counteracts that and gives them a few more years at the right end of the pay scale. But for others….it just means more time stuck in the mud.

That makes some assumptions. The first being that we all went back to the airlines we were furloughed from. But after the 65 increase, the furloughs were extended so long that many of us just moved on and started over. About a 12 year hit for me.

It also assumes they're already in the left seat. If not, it's just another hit to career earnings.

It also assumes we would medically be able to fly to 67 to recoup those lost earnings. That's a big gamble.
Old 05-12-2022 | 11:23 AM
  #22  
ReadOnly7's Avatar
Slam-Clicka
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,578
Likes: 92
Default

Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan
That makes some assumptions. The first being that we all went back to the airlines we were furloughed from. But after the 65 increase, the furloughs were extended so long that many of us just moved on and started over. About a 12 year hit for me.

It also assumes they're already in the left seat. If not, it's just another hit to career earnings.

It also assumes we would medically be able to fly to 67 to recoup those lost earnings. That's a big gamble.
My comment covered all those assumptions. Good for SOME. Not good for others. You are clearly in the “others” camp. It’s a pretty $hitty system when we all have to hope for the end of somebody else’s livelihood to bolster our own. I just hope we all start to get some better contracts and it won’t be such an issue to have people ahead of us.
Old 05-12-2022 | 11:26 AM
  #23  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 200
Likes: 1
Default

What would happen if you mandatory retired before this went effective (if that were to happen)
Old 05-12-2022 | 11:26 AM
  #24  
tnkrdrvr's Avatar
Living the SloBus life
Veteran: Air Force
5 Years
On Reserve
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 91
Default

Originally Posted by ReadOnly7
My comment covered all those assumptions. Good for SOME. Not good for others. You are clearly in the “others” camp. It’s a pretty $hitty system when we all have to hope for the end of somebody else’s livelihood to bolster our own. I just hope we all start to get some better contracts and it won’t be such an issue to have people ahead of us.
The challenge for new contracts will be pilot demand dented by age 67, pax airlines still losing money, and possibly (after last quarter’s contraction) a recession. Not exactly the climate for negotiating a contract I would desire.
Old 05-12-2022 | 11:28 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan
It also assumes we would medically be able to fly to 67 to recoup those lost earnings. That's a big gamble.
I'm counting on being able to go on LTD if the age changes. So, $11K/mo tax free.
That will help supplement my income as a Walmart greeter.
Old 05-12-2022 | 11:29 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,522
Likes: 1,113
Default

Originally Posted by mkitrn
What would happen if you mandatory retired before this went effective (if that were to happen)
Once you're off your seniority list, it's permanent
Old 05-12-2022 | 11:30 AM
  #27  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 200
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
Once you're off your seniority list, it's permanent
I wonder if people would go fly 121 somewhere for 2-3 years at bottom of the list?
Old 05-12-2022 | 11:33 AM
  #28  
WHACKMASTER's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,578
Likes: 286
From: DOWNGRADE COMPLETE: Thanks Gary. Thanks SWAPA.
Default

Originally Posted by BLMPilot
I hope the old grandpas aren’t offended when a gen z has to take the controls during a boomer senior moment. After 65 an auto land should be required on their legs, plus they should be banned from landing at certain airports.
Wow. Dramatic much? I’m totally against raising the age but what a crock of $7it you’re spewing.
Old 05-12-2022 | 11:33 AM
  #29  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 307
Likes: 37
From: A330 FO
Default

Originally Posted by mkitrn
I wonder if people would go fly 121 somewhere for 2-3 years at bottom of the list?
I would guess the legacies would stop hiring for a few years if nobody is retiring. But I guess the regionals would be hiring.
Old 05-12-2022 | 11:36 AM
  #30  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 200
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Moonbeam
I would guess the legacies would stop hiring for a few years if nobody is retiring. But I guess the regionals would be hiring.
do you really think though all the 65 year olds are gonna be like let me stay at this another 2-3 years cdc life expectancy male is 76.3… I feel like some folks would take the opportunity but some would still retire?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SonicFlyer
Major
254
01-28-2022 04:58 PM
fireman0174
Major
79
01-07-2007 08:46 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices