Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Severe Pilot Shortage Article >

Severe Pilot Shortage Article

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Severe Pilot Shortage Article

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-16-2022 | 02:32 PM
  #21  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,208
Likes: 7
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by mcfadden
If there's a pay shortage in the "gap between 250 hrs and 1500 hours" then the problem can be solved by either increasing pay for pilots in that gap or after 1500 hours, or both.
False. Pay has dramatically increased at the regionals and yet the pilot shortage is only getting worse.
Reply
Old 05-16-2022 | 03:19 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
False. Pay has dramatically increased at the regionals and yet the pilot shortage is only getting worse.
LOL you can't be serious. Using your logic that must mean that increasing pay makes the pilot shortage worse. Did you ever consider that the so-called shortage would be a lot worse if they hadn't increased pay and that maybe they just haven't increased it enough to fix the problem?

If the regionals paid every pilot $500k a year do you think they would have substantially more pilots applying over time or would that make the shortage worse in your mind?
Reply
Old 05-16-2022 | 04:27 PM
  #23  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,208
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by mcfadden
LOL you can't be serious. Using your logic that must mean that increasing pay makes the pilot shortage worse. Did you ever consider that the so-called shortage would be a lot worse if they hadn't increased pay and that maybe they just haven't increased it enough to fix the problem?

If the regionals paid every pilot $500k a year do you think they would have substantially more pilots applying over time or would that make the shortage worse in your mind?
You fail to comprehend that regional pay is not the problem. Training costs, and the time between training and regional entry is the problem. Moving regional pay to $500k/yr still doesn't fix that. This has been explained multiple times.
Reply
Old 05-16-2022 | 05:01 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 4,213
Likes: 703
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
You fail to comprehend that regional pay is not the problem. Training costs, and the time between training and regional entry is the problem. Moving regional pay to $500k/yr still doesn't fix that. This has been explained multiple times.
Well I think it would help..being able to pay off your flight school loans out of your first year 500k regional salary kinda would motivate people to sign up for flight school 😂
Reply
Old 05-16-2022 | 05:08 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
You fail to comprehend that regional pay is not the problem. Training costs, and the time between training and regional entry is the problem. Moving regional pay to $500k/yr still doesn't fix that. This has been explained multiple times.
If regional pay was $500k/year there would be countless number of college students who would change their major to Aviation and even older people in other fields who would take out loans or mortgage their homes to pay for training and maybe even buy their own plane to get to 1500 hours in order to make $500k/year at a regional. How is that not obvious to you?

What if the regionals paid $2 million/year? Do you still think that wouldn't happen?
Reply
Old 05-16-2022 | 05:09 PM
  #26  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 35
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
You fail to comprehend that regional pay is not the problem. Training costs, and the time between training and regional entry is the problem. Moving regional pay to $500k/yr still doesn't fix that. This has been explained multiple times.
You’re so incredibly wrong and insist on doubling down on your complete and utter BS that is blows my mind.

Removing the ATP requirement for FOs or lowering the requirements for the ATP itself would only make a difference for the pilots who are CURRENTLY between their commercial and their first airline job. Once you exhausted that pool you’re right back to where we are right now. Nothing changes if you don’t increase the number of people who WANT to be airline pilots.

The problem is that nobody WANTED to be an airline pilot in the first place, because of the garbage pay which meant you’d be paying off that expensive cost of entry for a loooong time. The way to increase the number of people who want to become airline pilots is to increase the payoff, not institute changes that would lead to a reduced payoff, which is why we’re in this position in the first place!

This has been explained to you multiple times.
Reply
Old 05-16-2022 | 06:09 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Given that Sen Graham is already rounding up support for an age change, I'm guessing that it will change in 2023 and there's nothing we can do to stop it. I know that's not what people want to read, but given how much opposition there was to 65 and we couldn't stop that (that also happened pretty quickly once Congress got involved), I am bracing for a couple of years of very little movement on the seniority list. The good thing is that 65 is an easier time for pilots to retire since they'll be immediately eligible for medicare - that should get a reasonable percentage to retire.
Reply
Old 05-16-2022 | 06:18 PM
  #28  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 501
Default

Sonic flyer runs a flight school. That should offer some context for their posts
Reply
Old 05-16-2022 | 08:25 PM
  #29  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Default

I think what sonic is trying to say is that a lot of people don’t want to go or can’t afford to go through the hardship between 250 and 1500 because the QOL and pay is just so bad.

Ask any student/CFI in a flight school - no one will complain about regional pay AT THAT POINT. They are mostly worried about being able to pay back debt and being able to earn enough to support themselves till getting the 1500.
Reply
Old 05-16-2022 | 08:34 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Default

$1M for a new Cirrus.
$6.50/Gallon 100LL
17 Gallons/hr.
$15,000/yr Insurance
$9,000/yr Hangar
$3,000/yr Annual

Gee, I can't understand why there's a pilot shortage.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AirBear
Career Questions
39
07-14-2018 12:05 PM
Chimpy
Spirit
4
05-10-2017 08:52 AM
dckozak
Regional
0
04-06-2017 07:40 AM
AFPirate
Major
38
01-17-2008 02:46 PM
norskman2
Regional
49
01-11-2008 10:23 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices