Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Major (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/)
-   -   Let Experienced Pilots Fly Act (Age 67) (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/138687-let-experienced-pilots-fly-act-age-67-a.html)

jerryleber 04-25-2024 09:29 AM

Call Congress now! FAA Reathorization
 
Sounds like they are working on the FAA Reauthorization bill. Contact your Congressman and Senators now!

https://alpa.quorum.us/campaign/59948/

rickair7777 04-25-2024 10:38 AM

Thread re-opened since the FAA bill is now moving along. Discuss the facts and process only, all the generational infighting has already fully played out, feel free to scroll back through this thread if you need a fix.

No mention of age 67 in the current reporting...

https://www.politico.com/newsletters...l-now-00153541

Profane Kahuna 04-25-2024 11:53 AM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 3796184)

No mention of age 67 in the current reporting...

https://www.politico.com/newsletters...l-now-00153541

wow..... dropped completely?

.

rickair7777 04-25-2024 12:15 PM


Originally Posted by Profane Kahuna (Post 3796197)
wow..... dropped completely?

.

No. It's still in the HR, which is on equal footing with the SR going into conference.

The fact that Politico doesn't mention it as a point of contention in the final push might mean that it's already assumed to be in the final bill, or not in the final bill.

Either it's already been agreed one way or another by those who matter, or maybe it's not newsworthy because nobody GAS except pilots.

If the jungle drums were saying that it was going to be a sticking point in conference then you'd think that would be newsworthy. Age 67 might not be newsworthy but the FAA bill is and this has to get resolved. Maybe it already has been. Conference is very opaque, driven by personalities and agendas from leadership, and possibly even key swing voters when margins of control are thin (they are).

PineappleXpres 04-25-2024 12:20 PM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 3796207)
No. It's still in the HR, which is on equal footing with the SR going into conference.

The fact that Politico doesn't mention it as a point of contention in the final push might mean that it's already assumed to be in the final bill, or not in the final bill.

Either it's already been agreed one way or another by those who matter, or maybe it's not newsworthy because nobody GAS except pilots.

If the jungle drums were saying that it was going to be a sticking point in conference then you'd think that would be newsworthy. Age 67 might not be newsworthy but the FAA bill is and this has to get resolved. Maybe it already has been. Conference is very opaque, driven by personalities and agendas from leadership, and possibly even key swing voters when margins of control are thin (they are).

Jungle Drums. You saying that at flat affect is priceless.

Margaritaville 04-26-2024 07:19 AM


Originally Posted by rickair7777 (Post 3796207)
If the jungle drums were saying that it was going to be a sticking point in conference then you'd think that would be newsworthy.

The jungle drums are beating
With the tales from late last night
Cause stories bear repeating
For everyone's delight

You can hear em on the coconut telegraph
Can't keep nothin under their hat
You can hear em on the coconut telegraph
Sayin who did this and that
This and that this and that

Oh wait where am I? What day is this? What time is it? It's always 5 o'clock somewhere.

PineappleXpres 04-26-2024 09:59 AM


Originally Posted by Margaritaville (Post 3796477)
The jungle drums are beating
With the tales from late last night
Cause stories bear repeating
For everyone's delight

You can hear em on the coconut telegraph
Can't keep nothin under their hat
You can hear em on the coconut telegraph
Sayin who did this and that
This and that this and that

Oh wait where am I? What day is this? What time is it? It's always 5 o'clock somewhere.

And my mind went to Jumanji. The GenX to GenY divide.

13n144e 04-28-2024 02:07 PM

Apparently Cruz gave up 67 for the ability to skip TSA for all Congressmen and family. Sounds like the horse-trading is done. So is 67.

CRJphlyer 04-28-2024 02:26 PM


Originally Posted by 13n144e (Post 3797083)
Apparently Cruz gave up 67 for the ability to skip TSA for all Congressmen and family. Sounds like the horse-trading is done. So is 67.

Laughing at anyone who thought this had a serious shot at getting passed. It was always just a convenient bargaining chip.

13n144e 04-28-2024 02:37 PM


Originally Posted by CRJphlyer (Post 3797090)
Laughing at anyone who thought this had a serious shot at getting passed. It was always just a convenient bargaining chip.

Laugh away. It was much closer than you apparently realize. Passed in the House and went down by one vote - one - in the Senate Commerce Committee. In the end it split along party lines and ALPA held sway over the Dems. Even then it could have gone either way in Conference Committee but apparently Schumer pulled the plug and Cancun Cruz wanted to skip TSA real bad.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:00 AM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands