Call Congress now! FAA Reathorization
Sounds like they are working on the FAA Reauthorization bill. Contact your Congressman and Senators now!
https://alpa.quorum.us/campaign/59948/ |
Thread re-opened since the FAA bill is now moving along. Discuss the facts and process only, all the generational infighting has already fully played out, feel free to scroll back through this thread if you need a fix.
No mention of age 67 in the current reporting... https://www.politico.com/newsletters...l-now-00153541 |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3796184)
No mention of age 67 in the current reporting... https://www.politico.com/newsletters...l-now-00153541 . |
Originally Posted by Profane Kahuna
(Post 3796197)
wow..... dropped completely?
. The fact that Politico doesn't mention it as a point of contention in the final push might mean that it's already assumed to be in the final bill, or not in the final bill. Either it's already been agreed one way or another by those who matter, or maybe it's not newsworthy because nobody GAS except pilots. If the jungle drums were saying that it was going to be a sticking point in conference then you'd think that would be newsworthy. Age 67 might not be newsworthy but the FAA bill is and this has to get resolved. Maybe it already has been. Conference is very opaque, driven by personalities and agendas from leadership, and possibly even key swing voters when margins of control are thin (they are). |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3796207)
No. It's still in the HR, which is on equal footing with the SR going into conference.
The fact that Politico doesn't mention it as a point of contention in the final push might mean that it's already assumed to be in the final bill, or not in the final bill. Either it's already been agreed one way or another by those who matter, or maybe it's not newsworthy because nobody GAS except pilots. If the jungle drums were saying that it was going to be a sticking point in conference then you'd think that would be newsworthy. Age 67 might not be newsworthy but the FAA bill is and this has to get resolved. Maybe it already has been. Conference is very opaque, driven by personalities and agendas from leadership, and possibly even key swing voters when margins of control are thin (they are). |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 3796207)
If the jungle drums were saying that it was going to be a sticking point in conference then you'd think that would be newsworthy.
With the tales from late last night Cause stories bear repeating For everyone's delight You can hear em on the coconut telegraph Can't keep nothin under their hat You can hear em on the coconut telegraph Sayin who did this and that This and that this and that Oh wait where am I? What day is this? What time is it? It's always 5 o'clock somewhere. |
Originally Posted by Margaritaville
(Post 3796477)
The jungle drums are beating
With the tales from late last night Cause stories bear repeating For everyone's delight You can hear em on the coconut telegraph Can't keep nothin under their hat You can hear em on the coconut telegraph Sayin who did this and that This and that this and that Oh wait where am I? What day is this? What time is it? It's always 5 o'clock somewhere. |
Apparently Cruz gave up 67 for the ability to skip TSA for all Congressmen and family. Sounds like the horse-trading is done. So is 67.
|
Originally Posted by 13n144e
(Post 3797083)
Apparently Cruz gave up 67 for the ability to skip TSA for all Congressmen and family. Sounds like the horse-trading is done. So is 67.
|
Originally Posted by CRJphlyer
(Post 3797090)
Laughing at anyone who thought this had a serious shot at getting passed. It was always just a convenient bargaining chip.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:00 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands