Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
What defines heavy jet time? >

What defines heavy jet time?

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

What defines heavy jet time?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-23-2007, 02:27 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Originally Posted by Check 6 View Post
Not when you are sitting in one of those tiny seats on a 2+ hour flight!
Agreed, using 41k as the cutoff is a little silly. Not saying I have a better cutoff point, but's it a bit of an oxymoron. Lord knows the paycheck isn't.

However, I assume you are on the 300 at Purple of Brown, so we could say that your paycheck is "heavy".
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 06-23-2007, 05:13 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ottopilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,575
Default

The 757-200 is not "heavy" at 255,500, but the 757-300 is "heavy" at 260,000. The -200 is 500 pounds over the "heavy" requirement, so why not say "heavy"?

You say "heavy" in your callsign no matter what you weigh. It's what your aircraft is capable of, not what it weighs. ICAO doesn't use "heavy" in call sign. Their controllers are smart enough to figure out aircraft separation by themselves.
Ottopilot is offline  
Old 06-23-2007, 05:24 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: MD-11 F/O
Posts: 235
Default

Originally Posted by Ottopilot View Post
The 757-200 is not "heavy" at 255,500, but the 757-300 is "heavy" at 260,000. The -200 is 500 pounds over the "heavy" requirement, so why not say "heavy"?

You say "heavy" in your callsign no matter what you weigh. It's what your aircraft is capable of, not what it weighs. ICAO doesn't use "heavy" in call sign. Their controllers are smart enough to figure out aircraft separation by themselves.

Its "more than" not "equal to" 255,000 pounds. I've never seen a 757-200 certified at more than 255k. I know that they make the freighter at more than 255k, but I didn't know they certified a pax version. In any case, if you are "over" 255k, you should be using the "heavy" callsign in the US.

Last edited by cessnapilot; 06-24-2007 at 01:04 PM.
cessnapilot is offline  
Old 06-23-2007, 05:28 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Slice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Spartan
Posts: 3,652
Default

Originally Posted by cessnapilot View Post
Its "more than" not "equal to" 255,000 pounds. I've never seen a 757 certified at more than 255k. I know that they make the freighter at more than 255k, but I didn't know they certified a pax version. In any case, if you are "over" 255k, you should be using the "heavy" callsign in the US.
At Brown the 757 max ramp wt is 251K, 250K for t/o.
Slice is offline  
Old 06-23-2007, 05:30 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Slice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Spartan
Posts: 3,652
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
There are different definitions. For FAA certification purposes, a heavy aircraft is anything over 47,000# (or something like that)...so 50 seat RJ's qualify.

For ATC wake seperation, heavy is about what slice said (I thought it was over 255,000# but slice should know).
1/2 right anyway...
Slice is offline  
Old 06-23-2007, 06:15 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Ottopilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 2,575
Default

Continental's 757-200's are 255,500 for takeoff, but 255,000 at airports at/above 5,000'. The 757-300's are 260,000 and 270,000 (depending on which version you're flying: domestic or international equiped). We don't say "heavy" for the -200.? Maybe we don't want to confuse the FAA/controllers from other airline's models?
Ottopilot is offline  
Old 06-24-2007, 04:51 PM
  #17  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Default

Ill tell you what, If and when I say "heavy" the first time I make a radio call I just may have to snicker, its a right of passage...........
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Old 06-24-2007, 07:06 PM
  #18  
time and initals
 
ABK MAN's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: dispatcher
Posts: 254
Default

yeah, well, what weight constitutes using the term "super"? I know they used it in reference to the A380. What about the C-5, AN-124, AN-225, maybe a Beech Baron?
ABK MAN is offline  
Old 06-25-2007, 03:55 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
stinsonjr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 919
Default

I was under the impression that 757's of all models said "heavy" due to the remarkably violent vortices they created? I have also heard that a 757 will throw off a more violent set of vortices than a 767. Not sure where I read this info - probably here. I am not sure if the pilots say "heavy" or if the controllers simply modify spacing on a 757 to heavy standards. Can someone shed light on this, and explain why the 757 has such a violent wintip vortex?
stinsonjr is offline  
Old 06-25-2007, 04:00 AM
  #20  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Default

Not sure, but the worst experience I ever had was behind an American Md-80
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tanker-driver
Military
21
10-13-2007 07:12 AM
LeeFXDWG
Major
15
03-05-2006 01:26 AM
GliderCFI
Regional
20
01-23-2006 07:20 AM
daytonaflyer
Regional
17
01-13-2006 09:43 AM
Lennon
JetBlue
0
07-01-2005 07:27 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices