Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Run on the Banks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-2023, 11:41 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,595
Default

The 10th Amendment prohibits bailouts, the feds running deposit insurance, a central bank, banking regulations, setting interest rates, etc because no clause in the document specifically authorizes it. It's not rocket science, hell it ain't even political science.
SonicFlyer is offline  
Old 03-14-2023, 12:44 PM
  #42  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,588
Default

Flyby1206 is online now  
Old 03-14-2023, 02:04 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DeltaboundRedux's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2020
Position: Enoch Powell Enthusiast
Posts: 2,124
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer View Post
So which clause in the Constitution allows for it?
The what?

Sweet summer child. No offense, but “‘muh Constitution” was set on a course for irrelevance ever since Marbury v Madison in 1803. The Constitution doesn’t mean what it states, it means what the Supreme Court says it does. Full stop.

More specifically, the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. Which has been steadily expanded to give the federal government to broadly regulate ANYTHING if it affects interstate commerce, which banks definitively do.

A quick rundown:

Gibbons v Ogden - 1824 (gets the ball rolling)

Wickard v Filburn - 1942 (feds can stop you from growing produce in your own state even if you’re not going to sell it, because it affects the price of total national supply)

National Federation of Independent Businesses v Sebelius - 2012 (Affordable Health Care Act made constitutional because the Commerce clause applies now even to economic INACTIVITY).

Look, if the Constitution was supposed to ensure limited government with primarily elected legislators controlling it, IT CLEARLY FAILED. Has failed in that for at least a hundred years, and arguably much longer.

Doesn’t mean it’s a bad place to live. But only understanding how the levers of power actually work in the US at the level of an 8th grade civics student is ridiculous.
DeltaboundRedux is offline  
Old 03-14-2023, 02:11 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2020
Posts: 1,746
Default

Originally Posted by ninerdriver View Post
Oooh. This is fun.

Please cite the clause that prohibits it.
This is like the age old philosophies inside the US Navy specialties.

NUKE - "If instructions don't specifically say you can do it, than you can't"

Surface Ships - "If instructions don't say you can't, then it is assumed that you can"

Aviation - "Its actually easier to ask for forgiveness than permission."
nene is offline  
Old 03-14-2023, 02:42 PM
  #45  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 97
Default

Originally Posted by Forward lav View Post
This is correct. King george used the new world as his little piggy bank and the people here got sick of it. They don’t teach this in school anymore.


Doomed to repeat.
This is why DC and Puerto Rico should be states
DoubtingThomas is offline  
Old 03-14-2023, 03:28 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2023
Posts: 175
Default

Originally Posted by DoubtingThomas View Post
This is why DC and Puerto Rico should be states
What about Guam, St. Thomas and st. Croix?

PR pays no tax. They aren’t exactly chomping at the bit. DC was supposed to be neutral, but it’s a leftist chit hole.
Forward lav is offline  
Old 03-14-2023, 03:58 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bababouey's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 774
Default

Originally Posted by DoubtingThomas View Post
This is why DC and Puerto Rico should be states
DC is a hard no. PR I could entertain, a place that gave us J LO’s be-hind and pina coladas certainly has my attention. Cockfights at midnight behind the Hampton inn may just seal the deal.
bababouey is offline  
Old 03-14-2023, 04:04 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2023
Posts: 175
Default

Originally Posted by bababouey View Post
DC is a hard no. PR I could entertain, a place that gave us J LO’s be-hind and pina coladas certainly has my attention. Cockfights at midnight behind the Hampton inn may just seal the deal.
They pay no federal tax. I don’t thing they are dying to be a state.
Forward lav is offline  
Old 03-14-2023, 05:20 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SonicFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,595
Default

Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux View Post
The what?

Sweet summer child. No offense, but “‘muh Constitution” was set on a course for irrelevance ever since Marbury v Madison in 1803. The Constitution doesn’t mean what it states, it means what the Supreme Court says it does. Full stop.

More specifically, the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. Which has been steadily expanded to give the federal government to broadly regulate ANYTHING if it affects interstate commerce, which banks definitively do.

A quick rundown:

Gibbons v Ogden - 1824 (gets the ball rolling)

Wickard v Filburn - 1942 (feds can stop you from growing produce in your own state even if you’re not going to sell it, because it affects the price of total national supply)

National Federation of Independent Businesses v Sebelius - 2012 (Affordable Health Care Act made constitutional because the Commerce clause applies now even to economic INACTIVITY).

Look, if the Constitution was supposed to ensure limited government with primarily elected legislators controlling it, IT CLEARLY FAILED. Has failed in that for at least a hundred years, and arguably much longer.

Doesn’t mean it’s a bad place to live. But only understanding how the levers of power actually work in the US at the level of an 8th grade civics student is ridiculous.
You're dead wrong, but you're also dead right, unfortunately. I simultaneously agree with and disagree with your points here. 98% of what the US federal government does is unconstitutional. And it has been practically ignored since day one. In fact some would argue that it is completely illegitimate since the final Constitutional Convention was outside of the commission to simply amend the Articles of Confederation. So yeah, it doesn't stop anything as Lysander Spooner so astutely pointed out.
SonicFlyer is offline  
Old 03-14-2023, 07:52 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 3,002
Default

5 pages of nothing aviation related. At least when I troll it’s aviation related…

this thread should be moved to hanger talk section…or banker talk.
Halon1211 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Boner
Career Questions
4
01-22-2020 11:08 AM
Gordon C
Hangar Talk
2
06-26-2006 06:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices