Run on the Banks
#41
The 10th Amendment prohibits bailouts, the feds running deposit insurance, a central bank, banking regulations, setting interest rates, etc because no clause in the document specifically authorizes it. It's not rocket science, hell it ain't even political science.
#43
The what?
Sweet summer child. No offense, but “‘muh Constitution” was set on a course for irrelevance ever since Marbury v Madison in 1803. The Constitution doesn’t mean what it states, it means what the Supreme Court says it does. Full stop.
More specifically, the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. Which has been steadily expanded to give the federal government to broadly regulate ANYTHING if it affects interstate commerce, which banks definitively do.
A quick rundown:
Gibbons v Ogden - 1824 (gets the ball rolling)
Wickard v Filburn - 1942 (feds can stop you from growing produce in your own state even if you’re not going to sell it, because it affects the price of total national supply)
National Federation of Independent Businesses v Sebelius - 2012 (Affordable Health Care Act made constitutional because the Commerce clause applies now even to economic INACTIVITY).
Look, if the Constitution was supposed to ensure limited government with primarily elected legislators controlling it, IT CLEARLY FAILED. Has failed in that for at least a hundred years, and arguably much longer.
Doesn’t mean it’s a bad place to live. But only understanding how the levers of power actually work in the US at the level of an 8th grade civics student is ridiculous.
Sweet summer child. No offense, but “‘muh Constitution” was set on a course for irrelevance ever since Marbury v Madison in 1803. The Constitution doesn’t mean what it states, it means what the Supreme Court says it does. Full stop.
More specifically, the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. Which has been steadily expanded to give the federal government to broadly regulate ANYTHING if it affects interstate commerce, which banks definitively do.
A quick rundown:
Gibbons v Ogden - 1824 (gets the ball rolling)
Wickard v Filburn - 1942 (feds can stop you from growing produce in your own state even if you’re not going to sell it, because it affects the price of total national supply)
National Federation of Independent Businesses v Sebelius - 2012 (Affordable Health Care Act made constitutional because the Commerce clause applies now even to economic INACTIVITY).
Look, if the Constitution was supposed to ensure limited government with primarily elected legislators controlling it, IT CLEARLY FAILED. Has failed in that for at least a hundred years, and arguably much longer.
Doesn’t mean it’s a bad place to live. But only understanding how the levers of power actually work in the US at the level of an 8th grade civics student is ridiculous.
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2020
Posts: 1,746
This is like the age old philosophies inside the US Navy specialties.
NUKE - "If instructions don't specifically say you can do it, than you can't"
Surface Ships - "If instructions don't say you can't, then it is assumed that you can"
Aviation - "Its actually easier to ask for forgiveness than permission."
NUKE - "If instructions don't specifically say you can do it, than you can't"
Surface Ships - "If instructions don't say you can't, then it is assumed that you can"
Aviation - "Its actually easier to ask for forgiveness than permission."
#49
The what?
Sweet summer child. No offense, but “‘muh Constitution” was set on a course for irrelevance ever since Marbury v Madison in 1803. The Constitution doesn’t mean what it states, it means what the Supreme Court says it does. Full stop.
More specifically, the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. Which has been steadily expanded to give the federal government to broadly regulate ANYTHING if it affects interstate commerce, which banks definitively do.
A quick rundown:
Gibbons v Ogden - 1824 (gets the ball rolling)
Wickard v Filburn - 1942 (feds can stop you from growing produce in your own state even if you’re not going to sell it, because it affects the price of total national supply)
National Federation of Independent Businesses v Sebelius - 2012 (Affordable Health Care Act made constitutional because the Commerce clause applies now even to economic INACTIVITY).
Look, if the Constitution was supposed to ensure limited government with primarily elected legislators controlling it, IT CLEARLY FAILED. Has failed in that for at least a hundred years, and arguably much longer.
Doesn’t mean it’s a bad place to live. But only understanding how the levers of power actually work in the US at the level of an 8th grade civics student is ridiculous.
Sweet summer child. No offense, but “‘muh Constitution” was set on a course for irrelevance ever since Marbury v Madison in 1803. The Constitution doesn’t mean what it states, it means what the Supreme Court says it does. Full stop.
More specifically, the Commerce Clause of the Constitution. Which has been steadily expanded to give the federal government to broadly regulate ANYTHING if it affects interstate commerce, which banks definitively do.
A quick rundown:
Gibbons v Ogden - 1824 (gets the ball rolling)
Wickard v Filburn - 1942 (feds can stop you from growing produce in your own state even if you’re not going to sell it, because it affects the price of total national supply)
National Federation of Independent Businesses v Sebelius - 2012 (Affordable Health Care Act made constitutional because the Commerce clause applies now even to economic INACTIVITY).
Look, if the Constitution was supposed to ensure limited government with primarily elected legislators controlling it, IT CLEARLY FAILED. Has failed in that for at least a hundred years, and arguably much longer.
Doesn’t mean it’s a bad place to live. But only understanding how the levers of power actually work in the US at the level of an 8th grade civics student is ridiculous.
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Posts: 3,002
5 pages of nothing aviation related. At least when I troll it’s aviation related…
this thread should be moved to hanger talk section…or banker talk.
this thread should be moved to hanger talk section…or banker talk.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post