Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Proposal to Remove ATC Function from FAA >

Proposal to Remove ATC Function from FAA

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Proposal to Remove ATC Function from FAA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-15-2024 | 06:59 PM
  #91  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2021
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 28
Default

I don't have a problem with some Towers, and AFSS, being contractor operated.

Nationwide, no.
Reply
Old 12-15-2024 | 07:06 PM
  #92  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 101
From: 787 FO
Default

Originally Posted by jerryleber
Says the libertarian who cannot tell us of one successful economy on earth without a central bank and a regulated economy.
Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
The United States, for about half of its history.
So, you can't name any in the last 110 years. I wonder why nobody uses the Austrian school's principles? Too funny.
Originally Posted by ReluctantEskimo
Then what are you suggesting? Competing ATC systems?
Originally Posted by OpieTaylor
I would let NASA operate some FAA operate some, and Lockheed operate some.
NASA? WTF?

Originally Posted by OpieTaylor
You have no idea what can and can’t be automated to reduce payroll.
There are huge incentives in place to automate the processes and equipment especially with a huge controller shortage, and numerous technology companies have tried. That has little to do with privatizing ATC or not. All of those in favor have to explain how you do it without just transferring to a private monopoly which defeats the implied purpose of privatization.
Reply
Old 12-15-2024 | 07:06 PM
  #93  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 825
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
The United States, for about half of its history.
The same could be said for electricity. You wanna go back to that too?
Reply
Old 12-15-2024 | 07:13 PM
  #94  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2023
Posts: 825
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by jerryleber
There are huge incentives in place to automate the processes and equipment especially with a huge controller shortage, and numerous technology companies have tried. That has little to do with privatizing ATC or not. All of those in favor have to explain how you do it without just transferring to a private monopoly which defeats the implied purpose of privatization.
What privatization proponents fail to address is how they accomplish these things without either slashing service or raising costs. Because now the national ATC system is beholden to shareholders. Not the American citizens.
Reply
Old 12-16-2024 | 03:11 AM
  #95  
JulesWinfield's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,799
Likes: 204
Default

Originally Posted by ReluctantEskimo
What privatization proponents fail to address is how they accomplish these things without either slashing service or raising costs. Because now the national ATC system is beholden to shareholders. Not the American citizens.
There’s a lot of bloat in the giant bureaucracy that allows money to go to waste.See NextGen.
Reply
Old 12-16-2024 | 03:22 AM
  #96  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 101
From: 787 FO
Default

Bureaucracy and safety deficiencies? See Boeing.
Reply
Old 12-16-2024 | 09:23 AM
  #97  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 946
Likes: 218
Default

Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
There’s a lot of bloat in the giant bureaucracy that allows money to go to waste.See NextGen.
You mean the NextGen that still isn’t fully operational and is 80s technology?
Reply
Old 12-16-2024 | 12:59 PM
  #98  
galaxy flyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,244
Likes: 2
From: Baja Vermont
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff
the profit motive and safety are not always (often?) aligned. the product is air safety, and making that an mba’s cost slashing project is a bad idea.
My aviation experience is that companies are most hazardous when they're NOT making money. I've been airline, military, corporate, OEM, so take it for what's it is worth--profitable outfits are more willing to pay for safety fixes.
Reply
Old 12-16-2024 | 02:40 PM
  #99  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
My aviation experience is that companies are most hazardous when they're NOT making money. I've been airline, military, corporate, OEM, so take it for what's it is worth--profitable outfits are more willing to pay for safety fixes.
i’m referring to motive, not the current balance sheet
Reply
Old 12-16-2024 | 02:50 PM
  #100  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,268
Likes: 69
Default

It’s a racket. But not pickleball. Let Boeing do it.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flyer77CA
American
72
01-23-2024 02:53 PM
Beechnut
Safety
80
05-06-2021 04:04 AM
OnTheKlacker
Major
209
09-09-2010 12:36 AM
LeoSV
Hangar Talk
0
06-27-2007 03:59 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices