Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
JSX CEO being tapped for FAA head >

JSX CEO being tapped for FAA head

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

JSX CEO being tapped for FAA head

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-24-2024 | 09:58 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 179
Likes: 163
Default JSX CEO being tapped for FAA head

https://viewfromthewing.com/report-j...r-resignation/

Another in a line of leaders who hate safety regulations in their field, Alex Wilcox could become the head of the FAA. This would naturally be a disaster for pilots, the guy hates the 1500 hour rule, and found a loophole to work his way around it for his company. I can only imagine how quickly he's going to push for single pilot ops. Write your Senator and make sure they know you don't want Wilcox in charge of the FAA.
Old 12-24-2024 | 10:50 AM
  #2  
Margaritaville's Avatar
It's 5 o'clock somewhere
 
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 2,671
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
These idiotic knuckle-dragging union talking points repeated by mindless drones gets old.

JSX has never had a safety incident AFAIK. The 1500 hour rule has nothing to do with safety. And JSX is not using a loophole.

All of this has been explained many times before. Seriously, try to keep up.
Why can't you just say your piece (broken record anti-union and neo-libertarian rants) without being a jerk? Seriously.
Old 12-24-2024 | 12:00 PM
  #3  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,208
Likes: 7
Default

Originally Posted by Margaritaville
Why can't you just say your piece (broken record anti-union and neo-libertarian rants) without being a jerk? Seriously.
Oh I'm not being a jerk, I'm not directly attacking anyone. However I absolutely will call out propaganda and BS when I see it.

If someone wants to have a different opinion, that's fine. But people are not entitled to their own facts.


If the OP had instead written something like "I don't think Wilcox is qualified to head the FAA, I don't think he has the experience and credentials, and I don't like his political philsophies" then yeah that is a valid opinion (that I disagree with). But to just mindlessly repeat union propaganda...uh no... that can't go unanswered. And no, I'm not anti-union.
Old 12-24-2024 | 03:07 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 179
Likes: 163
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
Oh I'm not being a jerk, I'm not directly attacking anyone. However I absolutely will call out propaganda and BS when I see it.

If someone wants to have a different opinion, that's fine. But people are not entitled to their own facts.


If the OP had instead written something like "I don't think Wilcox is qualified to head the FAA, I don't think he has the experience and credentials, and I don't like his political philsophies" then yeah that is a valid opinion (that I disagree with). But to just mindlessly repeat union propaganda...uh no... that can't go unanswered. And no, I'm not anti-union.
They're appointing a guy who is fighting with the FAA over whether they should be allowed to operate under Part 135 with aircraft that were designed to be part 121. Same aircraft, same complexity, just a few less seats and a murky way of booking tickets and all of a sudden you don't need fully qualified pilots. This guy is not going to be good for pilots. You can feel how you want with regards to the 1500 hour rule, but the fact is it is a good standard with the added benefit of giving us negotiating power. Again, he's fighting to keep 250 hour pilots in the right seat of his companies planes, I guarantee he will fight to get fewer pilots required in the flight deck as soon as possible.

Quite frankly, I don't believe any CEO should be in charge of an agency that regulates their industry. There is a clear conflict of interest, and it just serves to keep the rich rich, and the rest of us under their boots. This guy just serves as a perfect example of that.
Old 12-24-2024 | 08:28 PM
  #5  
dmeg13021's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 939
Likes: 129
Default

You're not anti-union, just anti-pilot.
Old 12-25-2024 | 05:39 AM
  #6  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,208
Likes: 7
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by WarmSandDreams
They're appointing a guy who is fighting with the FAA over whether they should be allowed to operate under Part 135 with aircraft that were designed to be part 121. Same aircraft, same complexity, just a few less seats and a murky way of booking tickets and all of a sudden you don't need fully qualified pilots.
The pilots are perfectly qualified. They are commercial, Captain has his ATP, and both have a type rating. A few years ago the right seat didn't need 1500 hours and things haven't changed much in regards to safety.



Originally Posted by WarmSandDreams
This guy is not going to be good for pilots.
Another mindless union talking point LOL

Pretty sure that JSX is hiring lots of pilots. That is pretty good for pilots. And they are giving lower hour pilots a good start on their career.

Originally Posted by WarmSandDreams
You can feel how you want with regards to the 1500 hour rule, but the fact is it is a good standard with the added benefit of giving us negotiating power.
And once again you expose yourself as someone who is complaining because the union bosses are telling you to ha ha ha. I love smoking you guys out, you're so transparant.

The 1500 hour rule is unnessecary and has been. As you have shown, it was not about safety and was simply a gift to the unions. Thanks for confirming what I have pointed out.


Originally Posted by WarmSandDreams
Again, he's fighting to keep 250 hour pilots in the right seat of his companies planes, I guarantee he will fight to get fewer pilots required in the flight deck as soon as possible.
Pretty sure 145s are NOT capabale of single pilot ops, and attempting to get them certified to do so would probably cost more than the airframe.


Originally Posted by WarmSandDreams
Quite frankly, I don't believe any CEO should be in charge of an agency that regulates their industry. There is a clear conflict of interest
Now this actually is a valid critisim in some ways. Of course the fox shouldn't be guarding the henhouse, but also, who knows better about the industry.... people who work in it, or ivory tower bureaucrats? Granted most of what the government does, especially the federal government, it shouldn't be doing in the first place.


Originally Posted by WarmSandDreams
, and it just serves to keep the rich rich, and the rest of us under their boots. This guy just serves as a perfect example of that.
And again, you expose yourself as just repeating union talking points same as this guy:
Originally Posted by dmeg13021
You're not anti-union, just anti-pilot.
Old 12-25-2024 | 05:46 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,539
Likes: 148
Default

The so called 1500 hr rule was imposed by legislators. They might just as well confirm Sonic director, nothing changes the molasses pace DOT. Put meto behind the desk, for the right price, age 60 is back on the table..ho, ho, ho.
Old 12-25-2024 | 07:30 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
5 Years
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 4,193
Likes: 168
Default

Originally Posted by SonicFlyer
Oh I'm not being a jerk, I'm not directly attacking anyone. However I absolutely will call out propaganda and BS when I see it.

If someone wants to have a different opinion, that's fine. But people are not entitled to their own facts.


If the OP had instead written something like "I don't think Wilcox is qualified to head the FAA, I don't think he has the experience and credentials, and I don't like his political philsophies" then yeah that is a valid opinion (that I disagree with). But to just mindlessly repeat union propaganda...uh no... that can't go unanswered. And no, I'm not anti-union.
Not sure where you are getting this union propaganda thing from but I haven’t heard a peep for our union about this.
Old 12-25-2024 | 08:13 AM
  #9  
dmeg13021's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 939
Likes: 129
Default

Because when you're anti-union, everything else must be union propaganda. He's revealed himself to be pro-management and anti-labor in every post on the forum.

And also a strict constructionist. Libertarian-leaning when it serves his purposes.

But no friend to pilots. Which is fine. Just don't **** on me and tell me it's raining.
Old 12-25-2024 | 09:43 AM
  #10  
AAL763's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by WarmSandDreams

Quite frankly, I don't believe any CEO should be in charge of an agency that regulates their industry. There is a clear conflict of interest, and it just serves to keep the rich rich, and the rest of us under their boots. This guy just serves as a perfect example of that.
Well, in case you weren't aware, he would cease to be CEO of JSX if confirmed as FAA Director....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fly4hire
Major
128
01-26-2009 04:28 PM
shackone
Mergers and Acquisitions
151
02-26-2008 05:35 PM
vagabond
Major
2
04-16-2007 06:00 AM
RockBottom
Major
0
03-27-2005 06:09 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
03-07-2005 09:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices