JSX CEO being tapped for FAA head
#1
Thread Starter
On Reserve
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 179
Likes: 163
https://viewfromthewing.com/report-j...r-resignation/
Another in a line of leaders who hate safety regulations in their field, Alex Wilcox could become the head of the FAA. This would naturally be a disaster for pilots, the guy hates the 1500 hour rule, and found a loophole to work his way around it for his company. I can only imagine how quickly he's going to push for single pilot ops. Write your Senator and make sure they know you don't want Wilcox in charge of the FAA.
Another in a line of leaders who hate safety regulations in their field, Alex Wilcox could become the head of the FAA. This would naturally be a disaster for pilots, the guy hates the 1500 hour rule, and found a loophole to work his way around it for his company. I can only imagine how quickly he's going to push for single pilot ops. Write your Senator and make sure they know you don't want Wilcox in charge of the FAA.
#2
These idiotic knuckle-dragging union talking points repeated by mindless drones gets old.
JSX has never had a safety incident AFAIK. The 1500 hour rule has nothing to do with safety. And JSX is not using a loophole.
All of this has been explained many times before. Seriously, try to keep up.
JSX has never had a safety incident AFAIK. The 1500 hour rule has nothing to do with safety. And JSX is not using a loophole.
All of this has been explained many times before. Seriously, try to keep up.
#3
Banned
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,208
Likes: 7
If someone wants to have a different opinion, that's fine. But people are not entitled to their own facts.
If the OP had instead written something like "I don't think Wilcox is qualified to head the FAA, I don't think he has the experience and credentials, and I don't like his political philsophies" then yeah that is a valid opinion (that I disagree with). But to just mindlessly repeat union propaganda...uh no... that can't go unanswered. And no, I'm not anti-union.
#4
Thread Starter
On Reserve
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 179
Likes: 163
Oh I'm not being a jerk, I'm not directly attacking anyone. However I absolutely will call out propaganda and BS when I see it.
If someone wants to have a different opinion, that's fine. But people are not entitled to their own facts.
If the OP had instead written something like "I don't think Wilcox is qualified to head the FAA, I don't think he has the experience and credentials, and I don't like his political philsophies" then yeah that is a valid opinion (that I disagree with). But to just mindlessly repeat union propaganda...uh no... that can't go unanswered. And no, I'm not anti-union.
If someone wants to have a different opinion, that's fine. But people are not entitled to their own facts.
If the OP had instead written something like "I don't think Wilcox is qualified to head the FAA, I don't think he has the experience and credentials, and I don't like his political philsophies" then yeah that is a valid opinion (that I disagree with). But to just mindlessly repeat union propaganda...uh no... that can't go unanswered. And no, I'm not anti-union.
Quite frankly, I don't believe any CEO should be in charge of an agency that regulates their industry. There is a clear conflict of interest, and it just serves to keep the rich rich, and the rest of us under their boots. This guy just serves as a perfect example of that.
#5
#6
Banned
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 4,208
Likes: 7
They're appointing a guy who is fighting with the FAA over whether they should be allowed to operate under Part 135 with aircraft that were designed to be part 121. Same aircraft, same complexity, just a few less seats and a murky way of booking tickets and all of a sudden you don't need fully qualified pilots.
Another mindless union talking point LOL
Pretty sure that JSX is hiring lots of pilots. That is pretty good for pilots. And they are giving lower hour pilots a good start on their career.
The 1500 hour rule is unnessecary and has been. As you have shown, it was not about safety and was simply a gift to the unions. Thanks for confirming what I have pointed out.
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,539
Likes: 148
The so called 1500 hr rule was imposed by legislators. They might just as well confirm Sonic director, nothing changes the molasses pace DOT. Put meto behind the desk, for the right price, age 60 is back on the table..ho, ho, ho.
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 4,193
Likes: 168
Oh I'm not being a jerk, I'm not directly attacking anyone. However I absolutely will call out propaganda and BS when I see it.
If someone wants to have a different opinion, that's fine. But people are not entitled to their own facts.
If the OP had instead written something like "I don't think Wilcox is qualified to head the FAA, I don't think he has the experience and credentials, and I don't like his political philsophies" then yeah that is a valid opinion (that I disagree with). But to just mindlessly repeat union propaganda...uh no... that can't go unanswered. And no, I'm not anti-union.
If someone wants to have a different opinion, that's fine. But people are not entitled to their own facts.
If the OP had instead written something like "I don't think Wilcox is qualified to head the FAA, I don't think he has the experience and credentials, and I don't like his political philsophies" then yeah that is a valid opinion (that I disagree with). But to just mindlessly repeat union propaganda...uh no... that can't go unanswered. And no, I'm not anti-union.
#9
Because when you're anti-union, everything else must be union propaganda. He's revealed himself to be pro-management and anti-labor in every post on the forum.
And also a strict constructionist. Libertarian-leaning when it serves his purposes.
But no friend to pilots. Which is fine. Just don't **** on me and tell me it's raining.
And also a strict constructionist. Libertarian-leaning when it serves his purposes.
But no friend to pilots. Which is fine. Just don't **** on me and tell me it's raining.
#10
Quite frankly, I don't believe any CEO should be in charge of an agency that regulates their industry. There is a clear conflict of interest, and it just serves to keep the rich rich, and the rest of us under their boots. This guy just serves as a perfect example of that.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



