Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Godspeed the crew of Artemis Ii >

Godspeed the crew of Artemis Ii

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Godspeed the crew of Artemis Ii

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-2026 | 06:19 AM
  #31  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2024
Posts: 625
Likes: 144
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
The plan is to establish a permanent base and human habitation on the moon. That would be historically noteworthy at least, if not as dramatic an event as Apollo 11.
would probably be better and cost less to just pay space X to do it
Reply
Old 04-07-2026 | 06:29 AM
  #32  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,098
Likes: 788
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by MELedMel
It feels like with space X this is nasa trying to stay relevant. Didn’t we basically already do this same mission like half a century ago?
That's an aspect of it.

But the business model has evolved to prioritize commercial for routine ops (hence ISS shuttle van), while leaving NASA to do the cutting-edge exploration.

Bearing in mind that when NASA does it, they still contract out most of the hardware, they're just more involved in development.

It is possible that commercial operators will ultimately play a leading roll in even cutting edge exploration.

Originally Posted by MELedMel
would probably be better and cost less to just pay space X to do it
Political realities, lot of associated jobs (both .gov and private sector) in various states. Writing one big check to one big company would probably not spread the bacon well enough.
Reply
Old 04-07-2026 | 08:12 AM
  #33  
Flubber's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 247
Likes: 1
From: Upside down, in the weeds and on fire
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Bearing in mind that when NASA does it, they still contract out most of the hardware, they're just more involved in development.
It's always been that way. Go pick up a copy of Lost Moon (Lovell) or Never Panic Early (Haise) and you'll see all sorts of aerospace companies (many names now history due to mergers and acquisitions over the years) that were central in producing the machinery used in the space programs.
Reply
Old 04-07-2026 | 12:22 PM
  #34  
hoover's Avatar
At your mom's house
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,700
Likes: 468
From: cpt 737
Default

Originally Posted by nene
Yet after years of development they had a capsule in which the FO was able to stow his overnight bag!
and the FO still has to do the walk-around
Reply
Old 04-07-2026 | 08:06 PM
  #35  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,098
Likes: 788
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Flubber
It's always been that way. Go pick up a copy of Lost Moon (Lovell) or Never Panic Early (Haise) and you'll see all sorts of aerospace companies (many names now history due to mergers and acquisitions over the years) that were central in producing the machinery used in the space programs.
Yup. As a kid I had a collection of Grumman model aircraft, and one of them was the lunar lander.
Reply
Old 04-10-2026 | 03:54 PM
  #36  
DeltaboundRedux's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2020
Posts: 2,941
Likes: 211
From: Enoch Powell Enthusiast
Default

That old saying about “never meet your heroes” rings true.

Great book I stumbled on about the space race in the 1960’s:

“Dark Side of the Moon: The Magnificent Madness of the American Lunar Quest” - Gerard J. Degroot.

I still love the space race and the accomplishments, but this book does a great job popping some of the myths and sheds light on the enormous amounts of waste that went down.

“There are no bucks without Buck Rogers” - a common phrase at the time that cynically acknowledged the whole space race was enthusiastically embraced by the public because they were sold impossible narratives (space colonies, alien life, et al).

It was embraced by corporations and politicians because it increased opportunities for power and profits.

Artemis doesn’t benefit from this narrative, which is why so few care about it. Manned space exploration is insanely expensive and stupendously impractical.

Very cool though. I’d like to see a launch before it gets shut down when the national credit card gets taken away.
Reply
Old 04-10-2026 | 09:24 PM
  #37  
at6d's Avatar
— No Relief On Scope —
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 334
From: B737 Left Seat
Default

Well part 3 happens in one year. Moon Base in progress.
Reply
Old 04-11-2026 | 02:53 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 3,487
Likes: 137
Default

Originally Posted by at6d
Well part 3 happens in one year. Moon Base in progress.
Mr. President, we cannot allow a moon base gap!
Reply
Old 04-11-2026 | 06:15 AM
  #39  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,098
Likes: 788
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

There are benefits to establishing humanity off this planet.

It's also worth a shot to see what kind of economy can be established on other planets and/or in deep space... if it takes off, there are vast resources to be had.

I'd rather spend my taxes on that than on most of the other things they blow it on.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
990Convair
FedEx
57
01-23-2025 07:27 AM
USN2FEDEX
FedEx
3342
09-04-2019 07:45 PM
Trojan65
Foreign
21
01-27-2017 06:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices