![]() |
Originally Posted by Beech Dude
(Post 4022737)
The embargo in the 70s, when the spigot actually shut was more of a shock.
1973–74 Shock: Arab oil producers embargoed the US, with production cuts amounting to about 7% of global oil consumption. Oil prices quadrupled in some markets. 1979–80 Shock: The Iranian Revolution led to a decrease of nearly 4.8 million barrels per day, roughly 7% of world production at the time. |
Originally Posted by jerryleber
(Post 4022747)
Sorry, the "spigot actually (didn't) shut".
1973–74 Shock: Arab oil producers embargoed the US, with production cuts amounting to about 7% of global oil consumption. Oil prices quadrupled in some markets. 1979–80 Shock: The Iranian Revolution led to a decrease of nearly 4.8 million barrels per day, roughly 7% of world production at the time. US ops haven't destroyed any energy infrastructure. If you're referring to Kharg Island; only military targets were hit. As stated earlier, global shortages are in the 5-7 billion barrels/day ballpark. That's in-line with the 70s embargo numbers and current Brent is at $103. So similar daily deficit to the embargo days (with more energy produced today then before so that 7% is even lower) and only $3 per barrel more than 2022; again, this is a short term shock, not some mass global catastrophe that you stated from the IEA's panicked message of "in the history of the global oil market." |
Originally Posted by Beech Dude
(Post 4022761)
...this is a short term shock...
|
Originally Posted by ShyGuy
(Post 4022649)
I remember 2022 when the Biden “I did that!” Stickers were on gas pumps.
I better see the same for Trump now. I like that they’re oversized. Good solution for a variety of products. |
Originally Posted by jerryleber
(Post 4022762)
Really? When and how will it end?
How will this end? No idea. |
Originally Posted by Beech Dude
(Post 4022761)
Ok. Spigot being a euphemism.
US ops haven't destroyed any energy infrastructure. If you're referring to Kharg Island; only military targets were hit. As stated earlier, global shortages are in the 5-7 billion barrels/day ballpark. That's in-line with the 70s embargo numbers and current Brent is at $103. So similar daily deficit to the embargo days (with more energy produced today then before so that 7% is even lower) and only $3 per barrel more than 2022; again, this is a short term shock, not some mass global catastrophe that you stated from the IEA's panicked message of "in the history of the global oil market." Also, it's irrelevant if US infrastructure is hit or not. Oil is a global commodity, not a local one. |
Originally Posted by Beech Dude
(Post 4022761)
Ok. Spigot being a euphemism.
US ops haven't destroyed any energy infrastructure. If you're referring to Kharg Island; only military targets were hit. |
Originally Posted by Beech Dude
(Post 4022761)
Ok. Spigot being a euphemism.
US ops haven't destroyed any energy infrastructure. If you're referring to Kharg Island; only military targets were hit. As stated earlier, global shortages are in the 5-7 billion barrels/day ballpark. That's in-line with the 70s embargo numbers and current Brent is at $103. So similar daily deficit to the embargo days (with more energy produced today then before so that 7% is even lower) and only $3 per barrel more than 2022; again, this is a short term shock, not some mass global catastrophe that you stated from the IEA's panicked message of "in the history of the global oil market." https://www.insurancejournal.com/new...news%20agency. …and now we’re blockading the Iranian blockade after we lifted sanctions on Iranian oil to help keep prices down. The brilliance of this 4D chess game is beyond comprehension. |
Originally Posted by Beech Dude
(Post 4022761)
Ok. Spigot being a euphemism.
US ops haven't destroyed any energy infrastructure. If you're referring to Kharg Island; only military targets were hit. As stated earlier, global shortages are in the 5-7 billion barrels/day ballpark. That's in-line with the 70s embargo numbers and current Brent is at $103. So similar daily deficit to the embargo days (with more energy produced today then before so that 7% is even lower) and only $3 per barrel more than 2022; again, this is a short term shock, not some mass global catastrophe that you stated from the IEA's panicked message of "in the history of the global oil market." |
Iran lashing out and damaging refineries to an industry they also need was an impotent, childish lash out because they have no leverage over the Persian Gulf now. US and IDF have air superiority, Iranian naval presence is almost null, as much as AP, CNN, MSNBC want the mines to be a factor, and the drones are hap- hazard, and a pin prick tactically speaking.
Poorly executed? 5,000 targets prosecuted, over 125 aircraft destroyed, govt/mil communications severely degraded, zero airlift/support capacity, Naval and Ground force operations nil, not to mention Ayatollah eliminated and their nuclear ambitions also severely degraded. Overall Iran finally put in its place and will continue to be. Stress on global oil and economies? Yes. Meltdown and impending doom coming due today regional conflict because less than 20% of the world's crude is being affected? Nope. Direct action is messy, diplomacy is messy. It hasn't been 2 months. I love how the media and so many people are losing and asking why hasn't everything been solved already!? This operation hasn't been perfect?! Outrageous! The US is attacking a regime that murders 40K of its own people and sponsors terror proxies. Outrageous! |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:01 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands