Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
DAL and NWA (not even trying to hide it anymore) >

DAL and NWA (not even trying to hide it anymore)

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

DAL and NWA (not even trying to hide it anymore)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-08-2007 | 06:52 AM
  #11  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by chuck h
The real question is if or when it happens will retirements and age 65 hold off long enough to keep anyone from being furloughed?
It is not that black and white an issue. Considerations include:

> Most legacies are in debt - even on older equipment. It is much harder to park an airplane when you have to make payments on it. Parking an encumbered jet almost requires using the bankruptcy tool. A merger amongst healthy carriers is unlikely since it would be hard to reduce capacity. With the same number of airplanes, the airlines need the same number of pilots.

> Delta's list is very young with few pilots over the age of 50. Age 65 isn't a factor at Delta for a decade. Many of the legacies have pilots who are older and who will retire regardless of the age 65 change. It could balance out. Unlike the situation at FedEx where there is a Flight Engineer seat to hang on to while waiting for the age 65 change to allow a bid back to the left seat. At most majors with 2 seat jets you can't come back after age 60.

> Maintaining physical fitness is an issue for all of us, if we want to work past 60. Most of us are going to be more effected by our own high fat / sugar diets than the mandatory retirement age based on pilot demographic studies and the degenerative conditions that are prevalent amongst those of us who make a living on the road. The pilots nearing age 60 now were less informed than our generation. Anyone remember when cigarettes and wiskey were practically considered health foods?

> The restructuring of employee benefits will make flying past 60 less important since retirement does not hinge on final average earning any more.

> The Boeing 787 & the A350. If airlines use it to increase frequency and replace larger jets the net result will be an increase in the number of pilots required to fly it.

My guess is that the bloodbath would be at the regional level as carriers might use a merger to reduce overlap in the branded 50 seat market. If those airplanes get parked it is much less of an issue since they usually are not on the mainline carriers' balance sheets.
Reply
Old 11-08-2007 | 07:07 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: 757/767
Default

Originally Posted by fbn0223
I believe UAL and Jetblue A320's are powered by IAE 2500 engines. NWA A320/319s are powered by the CFM56, which is the addtional engine type that was referenced in the article.
I believe the IAE 2500s also power the MD90's which we fly so maybe there's nothing to all this. Man I hope.
Reply
Old 11-08-2007 | 07:24 AM
  #13  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

MD90's - mo betta' power - yummy. Lets get that rumor going again.
Reply
Old 11-08-2007 | 07:31 AM
  #14  
newKnow's Avatar
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,844
Likes: 0
From: 765-A
Default

Originally Posted by greedyairlineexec
My bet is the merger mania will start with LCC's first. Big LCC buying smaller ones and Legacy buying smaller LCC's. Once those mergers are completed and skybus and virgin are put out of business the "new" legacy's will merge among themselves.

whether it will be SWA buying Airtran, AA Alaska, DAL or UAL buying JB, NWA buying Frontier or Spirit or any combination in between is anyone guess.

the "legacy" carriers will not merger until the bigger LCC's have been absorbed and use to take out the new entrants. they will ink deals like the one between KLM-Airfrance with DAL and NWA, which is more than code share and has antitrust immunity but stops short of merging. Once they can "prove" to the government that the removal of the LCC's and the new alliances are not bad for the american public ( more expensive tickets) then they will be allow to merge.

My time line is 12months for setting up those alliances with antitrust immunity,18 months for the buyout of LCC's, 48 months for the legacy mergers, 72 months for us all to get really fat contracts.
It's already begun. NWA has effectively bought Midwest Express with the backing of the same company that ownes Spirit. After that deal is announced, wouldn't you know it, Spirit pulls out of Detroit. Before this Air Tran is throwing money at Midwest Express and the "real" BOD there won't even take a look. Same for Delta when US Air was throwing cash at them. ("$10 Billion, "$11 Billion!, $12 Billion!!") Anytime someone won't even explore a deal with a group that is increasing its offer to you by a billion dollars at a time, expect that that group has a better deal on the table that you don't know about.

Puppet, dancing on a string....
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RatherBGolfin
Major
13
11-02-2007 08:56 AM
SWAcapt
Major
11
10-04-2007 11:44 AM
SkyHigh
Major
109
04-12-2006 09:00 AM
fireman0174
Major
0
02-04-2006 06:39 AM
geshields
Major
0
09-14-2005 02:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices