BA 777 Crashlanding

Subscribe
2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  16 
Page 6 of 19
Go to
Sad day for aviation everywhere regardless. 777 is a beauty of a plane and in general its not good for anyone. I hope Steve Jones wasn't PIC
Reply
Quote: Sad day for aviation everywhere regardless.
Actually I would call it a happy day. Another accident with all souls on board accounted for and alive. That's a happy result of what was very close to a bad day.

Let's find out the facts. Learn from those facts and move on.


No real point in fingerpointing or anything else. We learn from our mistakes and thank the gods that it wasn't worse. It could have been much worse. Thankfully it wasn't.
Reply
Touche.... I'm sad to hear planes crash, but your right its a happy day that no lives were loss and that it wasn't any worse then it could be.
Reply
If I recall correctly, this is the first serious 777 crash that resulted in a write off?
Reply
Quote: If I recall correctly, this is the first serious 777 crash that resulted in a write off?
I second that, it is the first 777 I can recall being written off in a crash. As a matter of fact, I can't recall any 777 incident. Anyone?
Reply
Quote: I second that, it is the first 777 I can recall being written off in a crash. As a matter of fact, I can't recall any 777 incident. Anyone?
Do we know it will be written off yet? I've seen hulls with more damage that what this 777 appears to have sustained repaired.
Reply
Quote: Ab Initio under JAA and 'Ab Initio' under FAA are two wildly different things. Trust me. I know both.

one involves a washout rate of 80%-90%. The other involves a one-day course at some "school" in Texas where you do electronic flash cards involving short term memory. The pass rate is very high. The long term retention of this is not.

I don't hope anyone high or low time was involved in this accident. Thankfully nobody was hurt.

But there is NO COMPARISON between Euro low-timers and US low-timers. Done both.

There is no reason a low-timer can't do this job if they are selected and trained properly. And no, you can't just buy your job over there. It's a 'whole 'nuther ball o' wax' over there. My Interview/Selection lasted three days there. Here in the US it lasted about 10 minutes. Including a test of something like 10 questions. You're kidding, right?

Good pilots exist everywhere. It's judgement and training and experience and selection, and, and, and and.....

Peace.

Thankfully nobody was hurt and tomorrow we will learn something from this instead of people going to funerals.

Yep, but reading up to page 4, the debate WASN'T between a U.S. civilian ab initio and a euro ab initio. It was between the euro civilain and a military pilot.

The other guy brought up the point that "only the best passed" Yeah, the thing is the mil guy had to be thinking in excess of 400kts in a sophisticated, complex, fast moving jet, with an IP yelling at him in the back. The euro civ has to be thinking at 100 kts. See a difference? After 200 hours of flying, how would you compare the civ ab intitio to the tactical jet pilots?

I'm sure that the euro civ trying to learn cross country pilotage/dead reckoning in a 172/Bonanza/whatever solely to comply with the requirement is just as capable (if not more) then the mil guy learning low level tactical navigation in something like a T-38. Sarcasm off.

Also, where in the thread up to this point is FAA ab intio being compare to euro? Is there such a thing? Sorry, but I've never even heard of ATP saying you can come down, bang out a written for a rating like you are making reference, and call it "ab initio".

I shudder to say it, but the closest thing we have/had to a true ab initio lately in the states that wasn't military was MAPD.
Reply
Quote: ....The DELTA 767 crew shutdown both engines inflight.....I guess you could say that was caused by fuel starvation...

Bill
That was one harry incident. If I remember correctly the Captain shut down both engines on his own at low altitude without reference to the checklist. The switches he thought he was moving were later move to the overhead panel. I think he decided to retire (with a little encouragement) after the incident.
Reply
Quote: I recall seeing many widebody BA airplanes with no overwing exits. Does anyone have info on this? is it true?

thanks
The 777 doesn't have any overwing exits. On each side of the aircraft there are 2 slides forward of the wing, 1 slide just aft of the wing, and 1 further aft under the leading edge of the verticle stab for a total of 8 slides. Judging from the pictures all slides worked as advertised.

It would take a really serious evacuation scenario for me to jump from the wing because she sits pretty high off the ground.
Reply
Quote: That was one harry incident. If I remember correctly the Captain shut down both engines on his own at low altitude without reference to the checklist. The switches he thought he was moving were later move to the overhead panel. I think he decided to retire (with a little encouragement) after the incident.
It was hairy...I knew both pilots...flew with both several times. Captain was a little wierd, but not a bad pilot. Delta told him he could come back, but as a permanent copilot. He retired instead. Was killed a few years later in an amphib. crash. The final straw was that after getting them both relit, he decided to continue on to CVG, and told the passengers what had happened. I believe I could have lied my way out of this one and looked like a hero.
Reply
2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  16 
Page 6 of 19
Go to