Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Plane searched at LAX after threat >

Plane searched at LAX after threat

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Plane searched at LAX after threat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2008, 02:45 PM
  #1  
Working Class Dog
Thread Starter
 
11Fan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Spares Pusher
Posts: 1,668
Default Plane searched at LAX after threat

LOS ANGELES -- A United Airlines jetliner was being searched Monday after landing safely at Los Angeles International Airport following the receipt of a telephoned threat, authorities said.

The Boeing 757 jetliner, which departed from JFK International Airport in New York City, landed shortly after noon and taxied to a remote location at the western end of LAX, said Nancy Castles of Los Angeles World Airports.

There were 71 passengers and crew aboard Flight 23, Castles said Laura Eimiller of the FBI said authorities, including explosives

"There was a telephonic threat to United Airlines Flight 23," Eimiller said. She declined to elaborate, saying only that the incident was under investigation.

Source: http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/index


Someone late for their flight and tried to get it to wait at the gate again....
11Fan is offline  
Old 01-28-2008, 03:10 PM
  #2  
New ride...
 
1800 RVR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Posts: 534
Default

Originally Posted by 11Fan View Post

There were 71 passengers and crew aboard Flight 23...

Ouch, only 71 pax on a transcon. That's gotta hurt!
1800 RVR is offline  
Old 01-28-2008, 03:23 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 168
Default

Not if you're a passenger!
bravo24 is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 06:46 AM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
cactusdog16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: 737 Capt
Posts: 58
Default

Originally Posted by 1800 RVR View Post
Ouch, only 71 pax on a transcon. That's gotta hurt!
Those UAL flights from JFK to LAX and SFO are "Premium Service" and are configured 12/26/72, so 71 is not quite as bad as it sounds. Although the flights do usually run pretty close to full. There are usually some high rollers in first and business making the small number of seats for a 757 cost effective. Or so they tell us!
cactusdog16 is offline  
Old 01-29-2008, 03:49 PM
  #5  
New ride...
 
1800 RVR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Posts: 534
Default

Originally Posted by cactusdog16 View Post
Those UAL flights from JFK to LAX and SFO are "Premium Service" and are configured 12/26/72, so 71 is not quite as bad as it sounds. Although the flights do usually run pretty close to full. There are usually some high rollers in first and business making the small number of seats for a 757 cost effective. Or so they tell us!
That sounds more like it. When I was with ATA, we would fly the 757-300 with those kinds of numbers on our transcons. That REALLY hurt!
1800 RVR is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lori Clark
Hangar Talk
1
11-02-2016 05:02 PM
LeoSV
Hangar Talk
2
07-19-2007 05:02 PM
Fly4Beer
Major
16
01-31-2006 01:15 PM
Boeingguy
Major
10
12-17-2005 08:27 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices