Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Supply and demand!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-04-2008 | 04:05 PM
  #11  
DYNASTY HVY's Avatar
Retired
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,527
Likes: 0
From: whale wrangler
Default

Your tips are my salary? lol
Reply
Old 04-04-2008 | 04:36 PM
  #12  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Airline Captain (cargo)
Default

thanks for the greate information guys. If every airline agreed to increase their ticket prices for only 5 dollars!!!!! then CAL, DAL, and other ones wouldn't cancel their classes.

fly safe out there!!!
Reply
Old 04-04-2008 | 05:23 PM
  #13  
saab2000's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,755
Likes: 6
Default

Originally Posted by Linebacker35
The Oil companies have figured it out, its time that the airlines followed their lead!
Either consolidation or cooperation to rise prices are the only things that can save the industry

"Cooperation" to raise ticket prices is illegal. Also, if one airline raises fares on a route, there is no guarantee that the others on the same route will follow suit. I am absolutely no apologist for management, but this is a very competitive business and raising fares ain't as simple as all that.

Some form of re-regulation is the only thing that will bring fares up. And with re-regulation many of us might not have jobs flying airplanes.

Hate to say it, but it's a tough business.
Reply
Old 04-04-2008 | 06:49 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by saab2000
"Cooperation" to raise ticket prices is illegal. Also, if one airline raises fares on a route, there is no guarantee that the others on the same route will follow suit. I am absolutely no apologist for management, but this is a very competitive business and raising fares ain't as simple as all that.

Some form of re-regulation is the only thing that will bring fares up. And with re-regulation many of us might not have jobs flying airplanes.

Hate to say it, but it's a tough business.

Yes I know "cooperation" is illegal. I mean more like an understanding between the airlines that they could raise fares to a level that can sustain profits. Though I do agree with you that this is nearly imposible in that someone will always try to undercut the rest. Which I believe more often than not is the LCC's. If they were to raise their fares the big legacies would do so in an instant.
Reply
Old 04-04-2008 | 06:56 PM
  #15  
Pilotpip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default

Everybody knows that full planes that don't make money are better than partially full planes that make money.

At least that's the theory for our airlines.
Reply
Old 04-04-2008 | 07:09 PM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Pilotpip
TO-1, ECS and A/I via the TRS button on the MCDU.
I like the language. Sounds like an Embraer.
Reply
Old 04-04-2008 | 07:18 PM
  #17  
dunlaf05's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by bgmann
If you take just a 90-seat passenger airline aircraft...if the crew held out a tip jar, and assuming 2 FAs and 2 pilots. If every passenger just tipped $4 every flight, $1 per crew member, each crewmember would make $54,000 in addition to their current salary. Lets take a 1hr30min flight for example, and say you fly 900 hours per year (airline pilots are limited to 1000 hours per year)...

Makes for an avg. of 600 flights per year.

Each crew member would make $54,000 more per year (before tax) in addition to their current salary. i.e take $23,000 starting for 1st yr. FO that would be $77,000. This theory disappoints me. But so true and so simple. It is only $4 per passenger. Lets put the word 'profession' back into the professional pilot career. PASS THE WORD ON.

They can do the same for fuel prices. Just raise it an additional $1 or $2 in addition for jet fuel, making it $6 more per 1.5 hour flight. Just a few bucks will help with fuel prices, for now.

What is $6 per person on a $500 ticket? Its negligible. But goes a long long way.

You may be on to something.....Get a sign that says "I work for tips".
Reply
Old 04-04-2008 | 07:39 PM
  #18  
Pilotpip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default

Originally Posted by bgmann
I like the language. Sounds like an Embraer.
Yup. The mighty jumbo shrimp. This plane might be the king of freakin' acronyms.

Last edited by Pilotpip; 04-05-2008 at 04:50 PM.
Reply
Old 04-05-2008 | 04:20 PM
  #19  
nitefr8r's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: MD-11 Captain
Default

Reminds me of the Bud Light Real Men of Genius "Discount Airline Pilot Guy" ad, "sure we're concerned for our safety, just not as concerned as saving 9 bucks on a round trip to Ft. Meyers."

A quick Google search will turn up a You Tube video or 4 with the radio ad in them if you've never heard it.
Reply
Old 04-06-2008 | 08:08 AM
  #20  
FliFast's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 0
From: I was acquired, Not Hired
Default

Not to be sarcastic, but if fares like $49/one-way based on a roundtrip ticket were to go away, would airlines be able to raise fares and revenue per avail seat mile to make certain routes profitable ?

A couple snipets from former lives:

If Brand X were to raise their fare $1 on the route : Anytown USA to Your Town USA; Brand Y would be listed as the carrier with the lowest fare, while Brand X would be listed as the carrier with the highest fare. Sounds silly, but not all passengers are brand-loyal so much so as they are pocketbook loyal.

"Give me the cheapest ticket !!!" And the result: Brand Y, even though Brand X is only $1 more.

Second tidbit: When I worked at Brand X we were the small fish on the trans-con market: JFK to SFO/LAX. We competed against two of the big carriers (pre-Jetblue). We wanted to fill our planes up by lowering fares on the route JFK to SFO and JFK to LAX. In response, the two big carriers reduced all the fares into and out of STL which basically poached traffic away from us at our mainstay hub.

Is this illegal...nope. Is this a form of oligopoly...arguably, yes. The price on the transcon market was set by the big guys (pre-Jetblue) to cover their costs and any small fish that wanted to cut into that traffic was going to have to march in step or face the wrath of the big guys.

FF
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FlyingA320
Major
195
09-19-2007 09:15 AM
maximaman
Hangar Talk
15
09-11-2007 07:15 AM
HSLD
Major
224
07-18-2007 11:24 AM
SWAjet
Money Talk
3
11-30-2005 06:53 AM
Gordon C
Major
0
06-18-2005 09:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices