Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Great Job US Airways Pilots >

Great Job US Airways Pilots

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Great Job US Airways Pilots

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-16-2008, 10:31 PM
  #11  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 79
Default

Originally Posted by BoredwLife View Post
BRAVO US AIR. MDT I am taking a guess that you have never tried to deal with an airline managment group directly based on your remarks. Feel free to correct me if Im wrong.

You are correct....but I believe there is to be a better way. Don't get me wrong, I agree 100% with the pilots. But why destroy the image of the airline any further?
MDT06 is offline  
Old 07-16-2008, 10:47 PM
  #12  
Line Holder
 
warhawk's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 44
Default

"These eight pilots have routinely been above the 60 to 90 minute range. It just behooves us as a company to talk to these guys, figure out what they're seeing that we're not," (Company Spokesman) Durrant said.

That's rich. Seems to me that would be better accomplished in a conference room, apparently they were all booked, so the company has decided to hold the meeting in the simulator instead. That's an expensive meeting room that probably costs more per hour to use than the total cost of all these naughty pilots tankering a little extra fuel.
warhawk is offline  
Old 07-16-2008, 11:01 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
stoki's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: bar stool
Posts: 771
Default

This isnt the best time to drive customers away from US Air... as there are enough problems right now. Although the pilots are 100% correct.
stoki is offline  
Old 07-17-2008, 03:40 AM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
PaulFooley's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 67
Default

My understanding is that the pilots in this particular situation are getting their "re-education" not as a result simply of wanting extra fuel, but putting on extra fuel and then running the APU continuously during ocean crossings. If so, I don't begrudge the company it's right to prevent unnecessary and costly excess fuel usage by a small group out to "punish" management at the expense of all the other employees of Airways who want nothing more than a job at this time next year.
PaulFooley is offline  
Old 07-17-2008, 03:59 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 847
Default

Why would this "re-education" on how to turn off the APU, if that is the problem, require the use of an extremely expensive simulator?
Spaceman Spliff is offline  
Old 07-17-2008, 04:03 AM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
PaulFooley's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 67
Default

Pure speculation on my part, but I'd wager that it would give the company an opportunity, with some digging, to get them fired.
PaulFooley is offline  
Old 07-17-2008, 04:22 AM
  #17  
Line Holder
 
ironspud's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 747 Cap
Posts: 96
Default

OK. That does it.

Not booking USAir anymore.
ironspud is offline  
Old 07-17-2008, 04:40 AM
  #18  
A moment please...
 
JetPiedmont's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: Just passin' thru
Posts: 769
Default

Originally Posted by PaulFooley View Post
Pure speculation on my part, but I'd wager that it would give the company an opportunity, with some digging, to get them fired.
Perhaps, but more likely just a wake up call to operate appropriatly. They had probably talked to these guys before and didn't get anywhere, so time for a little spanking.

This whole Captian's authority issue is pretty much over anyway. The min fuel issue has become the perfect lever for management to let everyone know who's really in charge. It started years ago, like the "joint authority and responsibility" between pilot and dispatcher, and like the issue of "whose aircraft" it is when on the gate.

I don't like it either, but we've become the frog in the pot, and the temperature will keep going up and up and up.

"Strangelove" out...
JetPiedmont is offline  
Old 07-17-2008, 05:20 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
stinsonjr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 919
Default

I saw the ad yesterday. I was not a fan of the USAPA deal when voted in, and I am still unsure of how that will work - I say this to let you know that I am generally pro-ALPA and anti-USAPA.

That said, I loved the ad by USAPA. What the ad did was reinsert the role of "Captain" and introduce the term "Captain's Authority" to the general public. I have thought for a long time that ALPA has not done enough "PR" work on behalf of the pilots. Whether the ad was true or not, or whether the pilots are justified or not is secondary to the fact that their union is taking out full-page ads saying (to paraphrase) "management simply wants to save fuel, blah blah blah...but we the airline pilots care about you and your safety and we have superior judgement". This is an exceptional message for the public to have.
stinsonjr is offline  
Old 07-17-2008, 05:24 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
magic rat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 909
Default

Kudos USAir guys for going public with this issue! I'm watching USAir spokesman try to cover themselves on HeadlineNews....

See the power we have?
magic rat is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sr. Barco
Regional
89
09-15-2013 07:22 PM
SWAjet
Major
8
03-26-2008 05:00 AM
nw320driver
Major
15
11-17-2006 07:45 AM
RockBottom
Major
19
10-09-2005 07:08 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices