Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Bio-Fuel and you...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-2009 | 11:54 AM
  #11  
BoredwLife's Avatar
Thread Starter
First Rule of Fight Club
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,536
Likes: 0
From: My seat smells like cat pee
Default

Sweet!! Im from AZ looks like its time to pick up some cheap property down south. Tucson has cheap labor also.
Reply
Old 01-08-2009 | 12:16 PM
  #12  
limelight's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: C-17 Everything
Default

Originally Posted by BoredwLife
Sweet!! Im from AZ looks like its time to pick up some cheap property down south. Tucson has cheap labor also.
Is the minimum wage lower in Arizona?..........
Reply
Old 01-08-2009 | 12:22 PM
  #13  
BoredwLife's Avatar
Thread Starter
First Rule of Fight Club
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,536
Likes: 0
From: My seat smells like cat pee
Default

About $7.30 an hour but down south not everyone has the legal right to work and I would bet that about 95% of agriculture is farmed by these people.
Reply
Old 01-08-2009 | 12:37 PM
  #14  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,895
Likes: 689
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by thawednook
I read in at least 1 news article that the freeze point of the jatropha blend is actually colder than that of Jet A. This is another benefit of this formula and appears to be one of the large differences with other biofuels that have a much warmer freeze point. Apparently the freeze point issue has been one of the big stumbling blocks for using biofuels for aviation.
True, most biofuels freeze at 0 C

Jet A is -40 C
Reply
Old 01-08-2009 | 06:45 PM
  #15  
PILOTGUY's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Default

Hopefully a little additive can help with the freeze point. Jet fuel has a BTU (energy release) of about 132000-135000 per gallon. Biofuel is in the 130000-132000 range, so the energy difference is fairly small. The emissions reduction would be in the 60-80% range, according to Boeing.

Jet fuel is about 6.84 pounds per gallon, give or take due to the specific gravity of each batch made. Biofuel is 7.5 pounds per gallon.

Kudos to CAL for doing this flight.
Reply
Old 01-08-2009 | 07:27 PM
  #16  
Pilotpip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default

Simply having a cost effective alternative will go a long way towards keeping Jet-A affordable.
Reply
Old 01-08-2009 | 07:28 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,333
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PILOTGUY
...Kudos to CAL for doing this flight.
Wasn't Virgin Atlantic first with bio-fuel? If so, I'd say Kudos to them both...

Now that the gas prices are so much lower I'd actually support an OPEC gas tax which could make alternative fuels feasible... Normally I don't like when the government gets involved because they usually screw up things but this is a no-brainer - OPEC will hit us again sooner rather than later...
Reply
Old 01-08-2009 | 08:13 PM
  #18  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,895
Likes: 689
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by PILOTGUY
Hopefully a little additive can help with the freeze point. Jet fuel has a BTU (energy release) of about 132000-135000 per gallon. Biofuel is in the 130000-132000 range, so the energy difference is fairly small. The emissions reduction would be in the 60-80% range, according to Boeing.

Jet fuel is about 6.84 pounds per gallon, give or take due to the specific gravity of each batch made. Biofuel is 7.5 pounds per gallon.

Kudos to CAL for doing this flight.
Additives will get you a few degrees C unless you add a ridiculous amount...chemistry has it's limits. The freezing point is the biggest hurdle for most bio-fuels...they would simply require a redesign of the fuel system to keep the bulk fuel about 35 C warmer than current systems...$$$$$$$
Reply
Old 01-08-2009 | 08:25 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
From: E-170 Airbender
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
Additives will get you a few degrees C unless you add a ridiculous amount...chemistry has it's limits. The freezing point is the biggest hurdle for most bio-fuels...they would simply require a redesign of the fuel system to keep the bulk fuel about 35 C warmer than current systems...$$$$$$$
If we, the United States, can put a man on the moon, we can accomplish this!

I remember seeing and reading about a US Air Force, I believe B2 bomber being flown with 1 engine on synthetic fuel and then all engiens on synthetic fuel.

Is this the same fuel we are talking about. This happened 2 years ago
Reply
Old 01-08-2009 | 09:19 PM
  #20  
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
Moderate Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,681
Likes: 0
From: Curator at Static Display
Default Different Processes; Similar Names

There are a number of "synthetic" fuels being tested, but herein lies the difference...

The USAF is proving that its entrie fleet can be flown using jet-fuel made from converted coal. I can't remember the name of the process. You essentially end up with Jet-A that was made by cracking coal. The US has, I believe, the largest coal reserves in the world.

Virgin flew a 747 (only one engine used the bio-fuel) that was made from coconut oil. It worked, but is for all practical purposes, a publicity stunt. Coconuts grow too slowly and do not produce great enough density (biomass per acre) to be economically viable. And think what would happen to the price of Coppertone if all that coconut oil started going into jet engines...

CAL and Air New Zealand flew jets (again, I think only one engine used biofuel) on Jatropha-based fuel. Jatropha is interesting because it is a weed that will grow just about anywhere. Its density and regeneration are such that it can produce a significant biomass for conversion, and requires almost no cultivation (hands-off farming).

Thawednook, I too read that Jatropha Biofuel (I will call it "Jet-J" from now on) has a lower freeze point than Jet-A. It's an issue on long flights, such as the polar flights from the US to Asia. My one experience with it was in a 747-400, and our fuel got down to 3 degrees above the freeze point--the limit before you have to change course, altitude, or speed.

What isn't addressed is the "lubricity," or effectiveness of fuel's lubricating properties, as the temperature drops. This is important in systems such as fuel pumps. Just because the fuel isn't frozen doesn't mean it still is lubricating the pump. This probably still requires research for Jet-J.

In all these alternatives, proof that it will work doesn't mean it is economically viable. Can't remember exactly, but seems the USAF's cracked-coal (Jet-C?) costs over $50 a gallon to produce, in its current limited quantities. Other biofuels are also currently very expensive.

For the near future (I would estimate 5 years) biofuels will be big news items, but it won't become significant until it is cheaper than petroleum-based fuels.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices