Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Major (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/)
-   -   Handwriting on wall for Virgin America? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/36165-handwriting-wall-virgin-america.html)

IndyAir Guy 02-02-2009 06:49 AM


Originally Posted by astrojet (Post 550275)
VA is the only airline I know of ...that when you upgrade to capt. you are re-set to year 1 pay....this is lowering the bar, and hurts ALL professional aviators. for this alone VA shall cease to exist.

Cathay Pacific one of the highest paid airlines re-sets your pay when you upgrade. I dont think its lowering the bar at all, it just depends on what 1st year pay is. Its a European things, thanks Sir Richard.

tzskipper 02-02-2009 07:22 AM

Upgrading Captains do not got back to first year pay. Longevity determines pay.

johnso29 02-02-2009 07:28 AM


Originally Posted by tzskipper (Post 550319)
Upgrading Captains do not got back to first year pay. Longevity determines pay.

Not at Virgin America, unless it's changed since they started up.

Herkulesdrvr 02-02-2009 07:54 AM


Originally Posted by Fly4hire (Post 550200)
Not true. Has to be approved by each MEC of each airline you have JS on. And no, I'm not a fan of giving the JS to carriers that are non-union and have contributed to the lowering of pay scales, however the counter argument is there may be former ALPA pilots working there.

What is MEC?

Start up companies are going to have non union workers, that is inevitable. At one point SWA was non union, so was DAL, NWA. So what do you suggest those pilots do while they are trying ot organize? Maybe you should try to spread the word instead of tainting it.

tzskipper 02-02-2009 08:04 AM


Not at Virgin America, unless it's changed since they started up.
It has changed.

It is interesting that most of the diatribe that is posted as "fact", is generally b.s.... From the above issue to load factors, from finance to QOL issues. Most of the info is available through published interviews with their CEO over the past year... Although actually looking up facts would probably spoil the entertainment value that some seem to get, by hoping for the ill will of others.

Skipper

Fly4hire 02-02-2009 08:08 AM


Originally Posted by Herkulesdrvr (Post 550348)
What is MEC?

Start up companies are going to have non union workers, that is inevitable. At one point SWA was non union, so was DAL, NWA. So what do you suggest those pilots do while they are trying ot organize? Maybe you should try to spread the word instead of tainting it.

The JS that VA and any other non-union carrier enjoys are granted by the MEC (union Master Executive Council) of those carriers. I was responding to the charge that VA pilots are being treated poorly - they are not.

I do not see VA as a future SWA or anything else - the work rules and pay are another blight, hopefully eradicated, on our profession. Yet we still give you the JS, which is not a "right", but a privilege.

johnso29 02-02-2009 09:11 AM


Originally Posted by tzskipper (Post 550353)
It has changed.

It is interesting that most of the diatribe that is posted as "fact", is generally b.s.... From the above issue to load factors, from finance to QOL issues. Most of the info is available through published interviews with their CEO over the past year... Although actually looking up facts would probably spoil the entertainment value that some seem to get, by hoping for the ill will of others.

Skipper


After editing my post I did some research. I did find that the Longevity now carries over to the left seat. The pay still needs massive improvement. I'll make more on my 2 yr pay then a 6 yr VA FO.

In regards to the load factors, I cannot comment because I don't know. I did see that VA is scheduled to take deliveries this year, but I don't know if the economic downturn will effect that. I suspect it will.

I don't wish ill-will on the VA employees, but I CANNOT support the horrible wages, nor a company which was created by RB. I'm sure he would LOVE to get his paws on the US market,(he basically has) and I will not support cabatoge.

Please note that I don't consider VA cabatoge. I just won't support an airline created by a foriegn owner who most likely will attempt to further expend his company in the USA.

PilotFrog 02-02-2009 09:14 AM


Originally Posted by Fly4hire (Post 550277)
You are confusing freedom of speech. Introducing that we somehow have a "right" or "entitlement" to an opinion is a red herring that is irrelevant to solving the problem and adds nothing to the process. It's false logic. Having a "right" to an opinion does not make that opinion right - or wrong. Asserting the existence of the right is a failure to provide any justification for the opinion -it's a cheap way of forfeiting an argument without conceding defeat.

Good grief I thought this was a pilot forum, not a law forum.

Just wanted to break the ice a little :)

But he is right.

Jake Wheeler 02-02-2009 09:57 AM


Originally Posted by 767pilot (Post 550208)
Read up on your bill of rights. It is not a "first amendment rule". The "RIGHT" that you have under the first amendment is only that congress will not abridge your "right". Private industry/people/etc. can forbid it all that they please. That's what moderators are for;)

Good point. Still, I have a right to my opinion and management has a right to terminate my employment or, since this forum is also part of a business, moderators have a right to toss me.

Jake Wheeler 02-02-2009 10:00 AM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 550392)
Please note that I don't consider VA cabatoge. I just won't support an airline created by a foriegn owner who most likely will attempt to further expend his company in the USA.

They aren't cabotage, but how long before foriegn ownership and cabotage rules change due to the economy and globalization?

Anyone here wear America's jeans, Levis? Anyone know how many Levis factories are left in the United States? As long as pilots keep fighting each other, our day will come too and it won't be pretty.

Skyone 02-02-2009 10:16 AM

Bud Anyone?
 
Anybody have a Bud lately? Better check, it's owned by InBev out of Belgium. So only drink Sam Adams. How many here are driving cars other than GM, Ford or Chrysler? If you don't buy 100% American owned, than I believe we should be careful making the cabatoge arguement. Just don't drive to the cabatoge SOS picket line in a Honda.

I am no fan of cabatoge and think it would not be a good thing for this industry. Just look at your own lives and think what products you use that are not US owned.

The new USAF tanker may finally be an Airbus product. All I am saying is that the cabatoge argument is losing steam in this global economy. And the influx of loans from China keeping the US economy afloat?:(

Jake Wheeler 02-02-2009 10:32 AM


Originally Posted by Skyone (Post 550443)
How many here are driving cars other than GM, Ford or Chrysler? If you don't buy 100% American owned, than I believe we should be careful making the cabatoge arguement. (

What percentage of those cars were built in the USA and what percentage were built or assembled by Americans? Becareful about advocating GM, Ford or Chrysler as 100% American over a Toyota built in Huntsville, Alabama; Georgetown, Kentucky; Princeton, Indiana; San Antonio, Texas or Buffalo, West Virginia.

Cabotage is coming whether we like it or not. I don't like cabotage either but being in denial about it coming at us doesn't help us. The more we are divided as union pilots the faster it will get here.

acl65pilot 02-02-2009 11:24 AM

Built and owned by American's is two different things entirely. You can buy a car from Honda that was made here, but that money still goes to a foreign owner.

Eric Stratton 02-02-2009 11:29 AM


Originally Posted by aileronjam (Post 549396)
That's not what I said, but it's true, if someone was hired directly into the left seat at VA today, they'd make more than someone in the right seat at UA. They'd also make more if they were hired into the right seat at VA since their first year pay is more than UA. Their opportunity for advancement, (upgrade), at VA is greater and therefore would be another reason their income would be greater. Assuming you could upgrade in the same aircraft at UA in 6 years, (not likely), your pay would only be $8 more per hour than VA at the same time of service and you'd have spent 3 or 4 years more in the right seat with worse schedules.

This is all completely moot since it's not possible to get hired at United right now.

You're brilliant... (yes, that's sarcasm). And why do you think they don't need to take 30% pay cuts?



The pilot groups that caught up are: Delta, United, American, NWA, SWA, etc... Yes, they were all start-up airlines at one time and paid their pilots terribly. But over time, new pay scales and work rules were negotiated. It only took them a few decades to get them but you expect VA or whoever to accomplish this instantly or they're considered beneath you.

If AT, JB, Frnt, AW are so subpar, why aren't there numerous threads bashing them? Why single out VA? VA hasn't even had a chance to make a go of it yet and you've already decided that they'll never negotiate a better pay scale. You seem to feel that you and you're airline are entitled to everything and no-one else can compete for the business. It's ok to not like competition but be an adult about it.


I don't know, when do you think an airline should pay industry leading pay... day one? You aren't a business major are you?


You apparently don't understand the seniority system.

First off if you have to write that it's sarcasm, it's not that good. Your asking why I don't think VA needs to take a 30% pay cut? If pay cuts are needed at that low of a rate then the company is already failing and those cuts won't save it.

I like how you are comparing VA to delta, nwa, united, american and southwest. I'll give you southwest but the others were start ups when there weren't any other airlines. They were the originals. It only took southwest 30 years to catch up and that is only because the others fell. They never caught up or really fought to catch up in the first 30 years. I'm waiting to see how they do on their TA.

Threads on other airlines have all been out there. Jetblue had a bunch on here.

You want to give Virgin pilots the benefit of the doubt that's fine. I'm just waiting to see a pilot group actually fight to catch up and do it. I've heard pilots say "don't pick on me, we've only been around for 30 years and it's only our second contract." My response is what have you been waiting for this whole time. An airtran pilot's comment once was "it's tough to get a pay raise now that the rest have fallen to just above us."

As for not liking competition, when did I ever say that. I would love competition. I love that frontier, jetblue, virgin and airtran have entertainment on their airplanes. It makes the others have to compete. If you are talking about competing against other pilot groups who are undercutting the rest of the industry pilots then I'm completely against that. Let management do the competing.

You are right I'm not a business major and if you are I hope you are asking for a refund. Yes I believe they could be paying industry standard from day one. If they are a startup then their pilots will be paid 1st, 2nd and 3rd year CA and FO rates vs. the higher year rates of established carriers. There's already an advantage built in.

I do like that you won't even give an opinion as to when a start up should pay industry standard. That's the same answer everyone gives.

Eric Stratton 02-02-2009 11:44 AM


Originally Posted by John Pennekamp (Post 549668)
Are YOU serious?

You know nothing of my friend except what I told you. He and I were elected ALPA reps together for 3 years. I saw him speaking up for the little guy and for unity. I saw him risking his job to fight for his fellow pilots.

You completely missed the point. You can't judge a man by the job he takes.

And I hate to break this to you all, but unions in this industry are becoming more and more irrelevant every day. We have transitioned to what almost every other industry has... employment at will and merit based promotion. Why do pilots think we're so special that we should have different rules apply to us? Why should we have guaranteed jobs and seniority based promotions? This is not the industry it was in 1977 anymore, and it's time we wake up and smell the coffee. Don't hate the pilots that realized that already, and now work at non-union carriers.

Very true. You said he was a hardcore trade unionist and that he fought for the little guy. Then he went to 2 non union airlines that under paid it's pilots. That isn't very Hardcore. Unless hardcore to you means "only when it fits into my plans".

I hate to break it to you but your friend is part of the reason for the union becoming more irrelevant these day.

Hypothetical question. On your merit based promotions (upgrades or transitions to larger airplanes) how do you determine who gets the upgrade or the larger airplane?

Eric Stratton 02-02-2009 11:53 AM


Originally Posted by Herkulesdrvr (Post 549977)
What do you mean by "you are even getting the JS?" Are we not all able to ride on the JS no matter who we work for? You make it sound like VA isn't worthy of a JS. I don't think you would appreciate that comment if you worked for VA.

I don't think the pilots at the majors appreciate the VA payscales either.

Eric Stratton 02-02-2009 11:56 AM


Originally Posted by Herkulesdrvr (Post 550348)
What is MEC?

Start up companies are going to have non union workers, that is inevitable. At one point SWA was non union, so was DAL, NWA. So what do you suggest those pilots do while they are trying ot organize? Maybe you should try to spread the word instead of tainting it.

Those pilots should know the word by the time they are qualified to work at VA. I highly doubt that they don't know it unless they are military and even then I bet they would learn it rather quickly.

Herkulesdrvr 02-02-2009 12:49 PM


Originally Posted by Fly4hire (Post 550356)
The JS that VA and any other non-union carrier enjoys are granted by the MEC (union Master Executive Council) of those carriers. I was responding to the charge that VA pilots are being treated poorly - they are not.

I do not see VA as a future SWA or anything else - the work rules and pay are another blight, hopefully eradicated, on our profession. Yet we still give you the JS, which is not a "right", but a privilege.

Hey I see a lot of United dudes flying on VA so it goes both ways. You do not see va as a future swa? What makes you qualified to make that assumption? Just wondering. The JS is not a tool to barter, we all use the JS on other carriers at some point. Don't make the "I am holier than thou" argument because if you needed a ride and VA was your last chance to get home, you would be asking for a ride wouldnt you? Disclaimer...I dont work for VA.

Herkulesdrvr 02-02-2009 12:50 PM

I for one don't like to see other pilots losing jobs, even if it is VA or whoever. If these guys and gals were out of work many of them would be screwed.

Jake Wheeler 02-02-2009 01:30 PM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 550491)
Built and owned by American's is two different things entirely. You can buy a car from Honda that was made here, but that money still goes to a foreign owner.

Spoken like a defender of American management.

Here's the difference between an American-owned company with outsourced workers and a Japanese-owned company building cars in America.

Profits of the outsourcing American-owned company go straight into a manager's pocket so he can invest in a bigger factory in Mexico and outsource jobs.

Income from jobs in America go into Joe the Plumber's pocket. Which is better?

The fact is, due to the globalization of the economy, it is very difficult to tell what is made where.

acl65pilot 02-02-2009 01:43 PM

Each of these company is/ are global companies. My point lies in the fact that if you want to buy American, but from an American company. I have a GMC truck made in Arlington Texas, and a American made compact car. I choose to support two companies that have made America great.
I do not choose to buy a car made in the USA by American workers, but owned by a foreign company.(The profits go over seas not in to the pockets of ANY Americans) I bought two cars that have parts made all over the world but assembled in the USA. I finance with American banks, et al.

Globalization is the way that everything is going. I know it, and am not sticking my head in the sand, but WE has the American consumer have something to say about how and where our money is spent.

I will be the first one to tell you that too many executives have pillaged this country for all of it fruit. Our generation will have to repair what the "Greatest Generation" did to America. That fact is something I tell my executive level parents every day.

whaledriver1 02-02-2009 01:59 PM


Originally Posted by Herkulesdrvr (Post 550107)
even if you don't like VA doesn't mean you need to come on here and hope for the demise of another airline or it's employees. I know a few guys over there and all they want is to work hard and provide for their families. You should be ashamed of yourself.




Herkdrvr,


Well my friend, I'll just give you a memorable quote from the great classic Hollywood Shuffle...


'Hoes gotta eat too'

johnso29 02-03-2009 05:50 PM


Originally Posted by Jake Wheeler (Post 550427)
They aren't cabotage, but how long before foriegn ownership and cabotage rules change due to the economy and globalization?

Anyone here wear America's jeans, Levis? Anyone know how many Levis factories are left in the United States? As long as pilots keep fighting each other, our day will come too and it won't be pretty.


I agree, which is why I WONT support VA. Branson is trying to put his product in every country. He will glady pay his employees crap to do it. NO to Foriegn Ownership and CABOTAGE!!!!!!

astrojet 02-04-2009 05:43 AM

IT IS UN-AMERICAN to fly on virgin....they are a foreign airline using foreign equipment. there are too many job losses here in the USA...don't buy tickets on virgin america...that is money going into bransons pockets.

Saabstory 02-04-2009 06:21 AM


Originally Posted by astrojet (Post 551885)
IT IS UN-AMERICAN to fly on virgin....they are a foreign airline using foreign equipment. there are too many job losses here in the USA...don't buy tickets on virgin america...that is money going into bransons pockets.

Milk just shot outta my nose...thanks for the morning laugh....wow.

ExFokkerFlyer 02-04-2009 04:31 PM

UN-AMERICAN??? What the heck are you guys smoking?

Should somebody not fly JetBlue now? Lufthansa invested in them. UPS, FedEX, Delta/NWA, United, JetBlue, all the regionals... they all have airplanes made overseas. Oh wait, the 777 has some outsourcing on it, don't buy a ticket on that. Foreign accent on a pilot over the PA? Is he a citizen? No way should he/she have that job when there are Americans who want it. You guys are nuts.

Oh, by the way, better not go online, where do you think your computer is made? Uh oh...

Idiots.

Sailor 02-04-2009 05:24 PM

Also :

Dont drink BUD

fell free to ADD to the LONG LIST

astrojet 02-05-2009 06:51 AM

25 cents of every dollar spent on a virgin america tickets goes to richard branson...

deltabound 02-05-2009 07:59 AM


Originally Posted by astrojet (Post 552633)
25 cents of every dollar spent on a virgin america tickets goes to richard branson...

. . . and Richard gets "Prima Nocte" with every new-hire American-born Virgin America flight attendant . . .


:rolleyes:

Justdoinmyjob 02-05-2009 10:23 AM


Originally Posted by deltabound (Post 552679)
. . . and Richard gets "Prima Nocte" with every new-hire American-born Virgin America flight attendant . . .


:rolleyes:


Niiiccceee.......................reference.

Barneyrubble 02-05-2009 10:59 AM


Originally Posted by astrojet (Post 552633)
25 cents of every dollar spent on a virgin america tickets goes to richard branson...


Where do you find this crap?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:37 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands