Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta MEC suggestion for the Junior Folks >

Delta MEC suggestion for the Junior Folks

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta MEC suggestion for the Junior Folks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-15-2009 | 06:58 PM
  #61  
Rhino Driver's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: 73N CA
Default

How about we start by making "RECAPTURE" the number one theme in contract negotiations going into 2012. Let's stop talking about SCOPE and start talking about RECAPTURE. What are we willing to do to recapture the flying that has been lost over the years?

Personally, I feel anything over 50 seats, or anything that flies over 300NM should be flown by mainline pilots. There will be something to give initially in order to recapture what's been lost, if it's even possible. What are WE willing to give? I don't know the answer, but I'm throwing it out there for debate.

If it's got traction, call your REPs and let them know how you feel. If this is something that we really want, then it's going to take everyone getting involved to make change happen. I believe giving up scope has been a major detriment to our industry. We've allowed regionals to fly bigger and bigger equipment over the years. This has allowed management the opportunity to whipsaw the regionals against each other. We've all seen the carnage. We've all seen the degradation of our brand. We blame ALPA. We blame the regionals. We even blame the pilots that are just trying to build their time to get to the majors (which we shouldn't).

I don't know the answer, but I really think it lies with us, the majors. We gave it up, now we need to get it back. What's it worth to you?

Last edited by Rhino Driver; 02-16-2009 at 12:45 AM.
Reply
Old 02-15-2009 | 07:47 PM
  #62  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
From: New Hire
Default

Finally someone who gets it. First get rid of Lee Moak. He has no regard for any junior pilots or compass. And he is supposed to represent both.
Reply
Old 02-15-2009 | 08:15 PM
  #63  
matlok's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: ERJ-175
Default

Originally Posted by shadyops
Finally someone who gets it. First get rid of Lee Moak. He has no regard for any junior pilots or compass. And he is supposed to represent both.
How do we go about this? Our future as pilots is looking worse and worse by the day...

+5
Reply
Old 02-16-2009 | 01:31 AM
  #64  
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Thanks for recapping the utter bullsh!t Pineapple. Everything you were kind enough to post plus the other stuff that you didn't. Utter BS.

Carl
Another fact filled post by Carl. Great rebuttal there.

PG
Reply
Old 02-16-2009 | 03:58 AM
  #65  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

I think it is great that people are really miffed. That is a good thing. Now take that anger, and go down to your MEC office and volunteer. There are a lot of people that are needed.
Reply
Old 02-16-2009 | 04:10 AM
  #66  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,252
Likes: 95
From: DAL 330
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Once again, so much of what you post is utter Bullsh!t. You've always hated NWA, the pilots and the former union leaders. We know that alfaromeo...it's nothing new.

However, your slobbering love affair with Lee Moak speaks volumes. It is exactly my point. It is the same slobbering love affair amongst the LEC's toward Mr. Moak that put us in this issue of caving on scope. Our union is not set up for one man shows. It is supposed to be a democratic process. That is critical, because you never know when/if your dictator/one man show could sell you down the river. If there's no checks and balances, you're in trouble.

Let me break it down for you: Even if Lee is all wise, all knowing and all omnipotent, I WOULD RATHER HAVE A DEMOCRATICALLY DERIVED SOLUTION EVEN IF IT IS WORSE! Yes...even if it's worse than the perfect solutions that are always derived by Moak.

We are a democratic union. What is there about that you don't get?

Carl

Guys- Two seperate issues. I give Lee and crew an A+ for the merger effort and a D- for Scope related issues. The merger is history, lets look forward.

Scoop
Reply
Old 02-16-2009 | 04:12 AM
  #67  
Fly4hire's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
From: Left, left, left right left....
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
And today's treasure is tomorrows trash. His numbers and fleet plans are dead on. I see these 76 seat jets filling this gap nicely.
Your usually good info is off on this - there is a large spread in the number of cycles remaining on the DC9 fleet - true that some will time out in the next few years (and most have already been retired), and equally true that half the remaining (of the original ~173) will be good until ~2020 if navaid updates are made.

The real question is whether 1) navaid updates will actually be required, 2) whether DAL chooses to perform them or not, 3) the price of oil, 4) the state of economy and load factors, and 5) the availability of other next generation 100 seat lift.

Anyone who supposes to have the definitive answer to these and the immediate future of the DC9 based on 10 yr old articles, arbitration testimony, and CP scuttlebutt is deluding themselves.

I'll venture the fleet planners don't even no which direction they are going yet.
Reply
Old 02-16-2009 | 06:27 AM
  #68  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Another fact filled post by Carl. Great rebuttal there.

PG
That's all the effort your posts deserve Pineapple. This continuation of the premise that NWA was worthless is hardly deserving of any response at all.

Carl
Reply
Old 02-16-2009 | 07:08 AM
  #69  
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
This continuation of the premise that NWA was worthless is hardly deserving of any response at all.
Carl, you always twist words. Go back and reread my post. There wasn't a single negative comment about NWA or their line pilots. I have complete confidence that we are all the same, and will work well together, once given the opportunity.

The only negative comments dealt with a handful of obstructionist individuals working for NWA ALPA. Fortunately they did not prevail, the JCBA and SLI are behind us, and we are moving forward collectively for the betterment of all, rather than imploding ala USAir, who I predict will NEVER see a payraise, because the two sub groups will NEVER be willing to work together to demand one. And management NEVER offers anything out of the goodness of their heart.

Let me repeat: I have nothing but the utmost respect for Northwest Airlines, and the line pilots who work there, and look forward to working along side them for the remainder of my career.
Reply
Old 02-16-2009 | 07:39 AM
  #70  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by Fly4hire
Your usually good info is off on this - there is a large spread in the number of cycles remaining on the DC9 fleet - true that some will time out in the next few years (and most have already been retired), and equally true that half the remaining (of the original ~173) will be good until ~2020 if navaid updates are made.

The real question is whether 1) navaid updates will actually be required, 2) whether DAL chooses to perform them or not, 3) the price of oil, 4) the state of economy and load factors, and 5) the availability of other next generation 100 seat lift.

Anyone who supposes to have the definitive answer to these and the immediate future of the DC9 based on 10 yr old articles, arbitration testimony, and CP scuttlebutt is deluding themselves.

I'll venture the fleet planners don't even no which direction they are going yet.
My comments are not about the airworthiness of the aircraft. It is about the plans that our management team has stated. I agree that they can continue flying. It is just what the desire of management wants to do.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FL450
Mesa Airlines
554
06-07-2009 10:04 AM
Rotorhead
Major
0
01-27-2009 06:50 AM
dragon
Major
60
12-06-2008 04:43 PM
JetFlyer06
Regional
34
09-01-2008 11:26 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices