Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Hudson autoland flight 1549 >

Hudson autoland flight 1549

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Hudson autoland flight 1549

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-11-2009 | 02:16 PM
  #21  
Superpilot92's Avatar
Underboob King
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 0
From: Guppy Commander
Default

Originally Posted by usmc-sgt
One thing I have found most interesting in what the crew did that day was not how they landed but the decision to land where they did. I personally think that is where their experience showed, not necessarily being able to hold wings level and nose up at touch down.

I have often thought about that exact same situation out of 100 pilots how many of them would have decided to touch down in the hudson as opposed to doing whatever it takes to make one of the 3 nearby runways.

I think they made the right choice (obviously) as an attempt at any runway even if remotely unsuccessful would have been catastrophic with many losses of life.

Just food for thought as I am not sure my experience level would have told me in the heat of battle to put it down in the hudson, I may have tried TEB and we can all guess how that would have turned out.
At 3000 ft at time of the event i dont know if you could make it to TEB. I've been in and out of LGA lately and taken a look at it, TEB would have been a HUGE gamble. The gamble would have not only risked those on the plane but many people on the ground. Also if you come up short your chances of hitting structures would have been high thus increasing the chance of loss of life on board. He made the right call regardless of the outcome and did so in a very short period of time.

There are some swamp like areas over in that direction but that would have made it very hard for rescue crews to have reached the wreckage.

Bottom line is he did a fantastic job imho.
Reply
Old 05-12-2009 | 02:08 PM
  #22  
LeeFXDWG's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 0
From: B737 CAPT IAH
Default

Originally Posted by alwaysflying
My understanding was the aircraft was in Normal Law, thus computers controlling. The one engines was still producing power, thus hydraulics and had electrical power via APU and one Gen.
OK, once and for all, Normal Law" provides protections that would be VERY helpfull in this situation. The aircraft does not fly itself!!!!

If in fact they were normal law and alpha protection did not attempt to kick in....it was due to superior pilotage!!!

There is no Hudson river landing switch the hit to magically ditch the aircraft. That were flying the aircraft.....period! If it was an old Boeing, the stick shaker would have alerted the to impending stall just like alpha prot would have tried to prevent a stall. Had they been in alpha prot at contact, I doubt the outcome would have been the same due to an increased deck angle.

Do not confuse the system with the fact they were flying. it is like saying that on an aircraft that you trim off stick pressure that the aircraft is doing the flying. True to an extent but it was the pilot using the resources available to make it happen

Lee
Reply
Old 05-19-2009 | 12:54 AM
  #23  
WaterBoarder's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: A320
Default

Enough of this hero crap.
Sully got lucky after a highly questionable decision.
If grandma in a wheelchair could not have made it
out of the wreck in time the news coverage would be
different and he would face the courts.
From the point of dual flameout – or the point from
where Sully took the controls away from his F/O to
touchdown the A320 flew 12 NM.
It is only 7 NM back to LGA!
He made the ‘heroic’ decision not to endanger people on
the ground instead of thinking of his passengers and
crew first?
And then he forgets to hit the ‘Ditching Switch’.
The A320 flies easy because of the auto trim feature,
and green dot will let you glide at best speed.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alarkyokie
Hangar Talk
3
03-03-2009 01:39 PM
Convairator
Hangar Talk
12
03-01-2009 08:09 AM
WindSandStars
Hangar Talk
0
02-20-2009 02:05 PM
joel payne
Hangar Talk
1
02-02-2009 01:26 PM
CANAM
Major
5
01-21-2009 03:07 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices