Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Congress Just SCREWED you (again) >

Congress Just SCREWED you (again)

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Congress Just SCREWED you (again)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-2006, 02:50 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Browntail's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Posts: 498
Default

That's what ABX thought too. They are real close to signing for a raise on top of their $239/hr. They are an ACMI carrier.
Browntail is offline  
Old 06-09-2006, 03:28 PM
  #22  
New boss = Old boss
 
mike734's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Position: Ca B737
Posts: 2,762
Default

This could mean the end to the USA based airline system. The same thing happened to the US shipping industry. Today, ships are based overseas and the crew is primarily South island or third world country citizens. The Officers are Dutch or English and other first worlders (Look I made up a word like GW Bush).

I can imagine an industry where all crew are foreign nationals except the captain. The captain could also be replaced but the airlines may not want an English language challenged captain talking to the pax. For all of our sakes, I hope this takes 30 years to happen. Time will tell.
mike734 is offline  
Old 06-09-2006, 03:55 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: tri current
Posts: 1,485
Default

I agree this legislation will be bad for the U.S. Airline pilot in the long term. The cargo guys are a bit delusional to think that there won't be any outsourcing. All one has to do is look at Cathay Pacific and Dragonair to see that outsourcing from higher paying jobs can and will happen.

Wait a second, Cathay has outsourced their cargo flying to U.S. pilots based in the USA. Those U.S. based pilots earn much less than an "A" or "B" scale Cathay pilot. Same with Dragonair Cargo.

Interesting huh ?

Those sneaky Japanese have outsourced pax flying to U.S. pilots based in Honolulu. Did they do it because they felt bad about Pearl Harbor? No, I think they did it because U.S. pilots are lower cost.

Russian pilots who speak decent English have already left Russia and work for the likes of Korean, Emirates, Vietnam, etc. They make pretty good coin doing so. I doubt they'll sign on at some crap third world airline for lower pay. That is provided the third world airline could get approval from the FAA to fly to the USA.

India and China have such a severe pilot shortage that they are hiring Americans, Europeans, Russian, etc to fly their jets. Average Captain pay in India on the A320 and 737NG is almost exactly what it is at U.S. legacy carriers, $10,000/mo.

So, no the sky is not falling yet.

Just thought I'd interject these points into the discussion.


Typhoonpilot
Typhoonpilot is offline  
Old 06-09-2006, 04:33 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Randal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: A320 capt
Posts: 161
Default

Originally Posted by greedyairlineexec
do not forget that just like you could provide service from shangai to beijing, so can some foreing airline provide service from memphis to lax. you really think Fred won't open a wholly own airline in sri lanka and take away flying from you? he already does it with tradewinds.
you really think most rusian or any 2nd world country pilot gives a crap about scabbibg you out of a job?

this is the begginig of full foreing ownership and cabotage. you willl not have a job if those two scenarios occur. you will go on strike when Fred refuses to give you your flying back and is being done by some foreing entity and it will be a fiasco worse than the eastern one.

browntail, UPS says you will be doing all the intraeurope flying forever and ever and you really believe what those really honest guys running things say??? I tell you what, I can sell you a bridge really cheap and you can charge everyone who uses it. I'm selling it because I want to retire. the bridge is in San Francisco and is called "the golden gate" . is very profitable ,but, like I said, ,I want to retire. only $3mil, it must be a bargain for you since you are making so much money as a UPS piot and will be making so much moore when you get a new contract
Hey Admin could we please have a spell check button
there are 14 spelling errors, --can you spot them??

Last edited by Randal; 06-09-2006 at 04:39 PM.
Randal is offline  
Old 06-09-2006, 04:51 PM
  #25  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: B757/767 FO
Posts: 40
Default

TP,
you hit the nail on the head with your post. I wouldn't be surprised if it's the American pilots that are the low ballers. Just look at our scumbag regional pay system that somehow makes it okay to fly a 70 pax jet as an FO for $20/hr. We have guys triping over each other to do to boot. You won't see that crap anywhere else in the world. Heck even our Canadian friends start their RJ guys in the high 30's to low 40's. The threat of being replaced by 3rd World pilots is bogus because those countries are short pilots because no one can afford to get their ratings and those jobs are being outsourced to the rest of the world, heck a lot of Brits, Aussies, and Americans are enjoying employement thanks to that shortage. Global investment won't change that fact at all.

xtwapilot
xtwapilot is offline  
Old 06-09-2006, 04:54 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FoxHunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired
Posts: 980
Default

Originally Posted by Typhoonpilot
I agree this legislation will be bad for the U.S. Airline pilot in the long term. The cargo guys are a bit delusional to think that there won't be any outsourcing. All one has to do is look at Cathay Pacific and Dragonair to see that outsourcing from higher paying jobs can and will happen.

Wait a second, Cathay has outsourced their cargo flying to U.S. pilots based in the USA. Those U.S. based pilots earn much less than an "A" or "B" scale Cathay pilot. Same with Dragonair Cargo.

Interesting huh ?

Those sneaky Japanese have outsourced pax flying to U.S. pilots based in Honolulu. Did they do it because they felt bad about Pearl Harbor? No, I think they did it because U.S. pilots are lower cost.

Russian pilots who speak decent English have already left Russia and work for the likes of Korean, Emirates, Vietnam, etc. They make pretty good coin doing so. I doubt they'll sign on at some crap third world airline for lower pay. That is provided the third world airline could get approval from the FAA to fly to the USA.

India and China have such a severe pilot shortage that they are hiring Americans, Europeans, Russian, etc to fly their jets. Average Captain pay in India on the A320 and 737NG is almost exactly what it is at U.S. legacy carriers, $10,000/mo.

So, no the sky is not falling yet.

Just thought I'd interject these points into the discussion.


Typhoonpilot
Yes Cathay started using non seniority list pilots for cargo back in 95-96. The Captains, F/Os, F/Es were recruited using UPAS. UPAS happened to bo owned by ALPA, Herndon, VA.
FoxHunter is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Slaphappy
Regional
13
05-12-2006 05:18 AM
Delta102
Hangar Talk
0
11-22-2005 05:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices