Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

F9 rumor control

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-16-2009, 08:01 AM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Brown Dog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757/767 Captain
Posts: 59
Default F9 rumor control

From another forum:

I just talked to several friends at Republic that said the CEO of Republic is going to try to run F9 separately from the rest of the company. He also said that if the pilots fight this violation of their scope language that he will sell 51% of F9 and own 49% to get around scope.

There has also been mention of Republic using 190's under the Frontier Brand but flown under the Republic Certificate, and not flown by F9 pilots to get around their wages. They have already mentioned using Airbus 318's in MKE under the Midwest brand. Who will fly those airplanes?

And....

In the Denver paper today the RAH ceo said that "in six months we'll have the right airplanes on the right routes" Whatever that means.


Any truth to any of this? If so can you say "F9'd at the drive thru?"

B.D.
Brown Dog is offline  
Old 08-16-2009, 08:03 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: Right...CL65
Posts: 279
Default

The incurable cancer.
xtreme is offline  
Old 08-16-2009, 08:40 AM
  #3  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

I think that he is just telling you that he will sell F9. I am sure the For Sale sign is still in the window.
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 08-16-2009, 09:31 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Posts: 879
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
I think that he is just telling you that he will sell F9. I am sure the For Sale sign is still in the window.
Then why did he buy F9 in the first place? It's not like there are buyers who will pay more for F9, or they would have been at the auction.
FAULTPUSH is offline  
Old 08-16-2009, 10:18 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 111
Default

I don't believe for one second that BB will sell a majority stake in Frontier a few reasons...

1. A company will NOT spends millions a dollars to aquire another company just to sell majority control to another party. BB does NOT want to operate a regional airline! His vision has been and will ALWAYS be a major player in the airline industry. Example: Our aircraft seat capacity has grown in size since he's been CEO.

2. BB can't operate it as a seperate entity as our contract forbids it. BB knows this and he knows he will lose monetarily and negotition advantage if/when we go to court to fight it. It would be challenging (but possible) to run a cohesive airline without complete control.

3. Investors will question his leadership if he loses control of Frontier. Frontier plays a major role into putting together an airline that can compete head to head with our competition (WN, Airtran, Jetblue).
av8tordude is offline  
Old 08-16-2009, 10:55 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 309
Default

He can still have controlling interest. Keep 49% for himself and make sure the 51% is split amongst two or more players.

Why buy it in the first place?

Like someone else said, he wants to run with the big dogs.

Also, he now has a home for his 170's (or even 50 seaters like with Midwest) if people start kicking him to the curb when contracts come time for renewal.

Having to start everything from scratch was a huge disadvantage for FlyI and Expressjet.
FlyinPiker is offline  
Old 08-16-2009, 12:39 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TBucket's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,109
Default

I'd be careful thinking he "can't" run it as a separate airline due to the contract... Ours said the same thing when Gojets was started... There are a multitude of legal loopholes one can jump through to prove that the company is "separate"... One more layer of holding companies and subsidiaries, and they'll be all set...
TBucket is offline  
Old 08-16-2009, 12:56 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ScaryKite's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Powered parachute, left seat
Posts: 422
Default

Originally Posted by TBucket View Post
I'd be careful thinking he "can't" run it as a separate airline due to the contract... Ours said the same thing when Gojets was started... There are a multitude of legal loopholes one can jump through to prove that the company is "separate"... One more layer of holding companies and subsidiaries, and they'll be all set...

He already tried it when they started republic. There was a 97 percent strike authorization vote, and if he tries it again. I bet we get somewhere in the neighborhood of 97 percent again. And the gojet deal was a three way CF between DM, RL and ALPA. It could have been handled better on all ends. And our scope clause in our contract is pretty solid, they can find all loopholes and prove its a seperate company but our contract will hold against all of his trickery........... except if he sells 51% ( not gonna happen)

If there is one thing you can learn from BB and WHs good cop/bad cop routine, they always throw out the scare tactics, especially during growth/negotiations. He says hes going to sell 51 percent of F9. But he would be a fool to do so, many reasons already on this thread. If he wants to sell the majority stake by all means go ahead. We as the pilots of RAH would be right where we were before all this fiasco started. Hes just bluffing. He wouldnt throw away 150 million and buy an airline just to sell it off to get around some training costs.


ONE COMPANY, ONE LIST, ONE CONTRACT! If you think our current contractual rates are low now, wait until he offers all the 170 and 190 flying to Lynx at 50 percent RAH rates. Then the bar is set even lower. If there is one thing any airline pilot has learned in the past 25 years. SCOPE is gold, and never give it up for anything.
ScaryKite is offline  
Old 08-16-2009, 01:18 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 111
Default

Originally Posted by ScaryKite View Post
ONE COMPANY, ONE LIST, ONE CONTRACT!

I SECOND THAT....PERIOD!!!!!
av8tordude is offline  
Old 08-16-2009, 01:35 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SaltyDog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Leftof longitudinal
Posts: 1,899
Default

Originally Posted by FAULTPUSH View Post
Then why did he buy F9 in the first place? It's not like there are buyers who will pay more for F9, or they would have been at the auction.
Southwest was at the auction, my recollection was that Southwest offered more but got turned down. I think alot of pilots in several groups just got taken for a management ride, now the real pain begins. RLA favors the owners, not the employees. Good luck.
SaltyDog is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices