Republic/MidWest growth...taking Delta flying
#92
an actual regional carrier? what is that anymore? colgan? piedmont? delta doesnt have any "regional carriers" they are all capable of flying small jets through multiple regions.
oops i forgot they have mesaba's saabs. so they have what less than 50 regional airplanes?
oops i forgot they have mesaba's saabs. so they have what less than 50 regional airplanes?
#93
an actual regional carrier? what is that anymore? colgan? piedmont? delta doesnt have any "regional carriers" they are all capable of flying small jets through multiple regions.
oops i forgot they have mesaba's saabs. so they have what less than 50 regional airplanes?
oops i forgot they have mesaba's saabs. so they have what less than 50 regional airplanes?
#94
#95
Nu - exactly. One easy way, as you point out, is to follow the money.
The problem remains that this is the same argument the DCI pilots made back in 1999 when Comair and ASA were excluded from ALPA's merger and fragmentation policy. Both ASA and Comair were very profitable and it was hoped those profits would flow to Delta as a vertically integrated company like Rockefeller created Standard Oil to be. (Exxon/Mobil today)
But, ALPA decided it did not want to dilute the Delta pilot (contract/standards/etc...) and decided to exclude that flying. It wasn't just at Delta, every airline did it, US Air, United, Northwest, American, TWA and I think Eastern started the whole "outsourcing B scale is good" concept.
Now our exclusions are biting us in the butt. Every exception to our scope is a hole and I believe management over the past several days has demonstrated an ability to outsource A320 and 757 flying.
The problem remains that this is the same argument the DCI pilots made back in 1999 when Comair and ASA were excluded from ALPA's merger and fragmentation policy. Both ASA and Comair were very profitable and it was hoped those profits would flow to Delta as a vertically integrated company like Rockefeller created Standard Oil to be. (Exxon/Mobil today)
But, ALPA decided it did not want to dilute the Delta pilot (contract/standards/etc...) and decided to exclude that flying. It wasn't just at Delta, every airline did it, US Air, United, Northwest, American, TWA and I think Eastern started the whole "outsourcing B scale is good" concept.
Now our exclusions are biting us in the butt. Every exception to our scope is a hole and I believe management over the past several days has demonstrated an ability to outsource A320 and 757 flying.
Because there are some senior pilots that specifically WANT to exclude <100 seat flying with the misguided notion that they will be able to take that "cost savings" and use it toward higher wide body pay. Some would surely sell out even the 757 with that thought.
Granted most of those guys will never suffer from that thinking as they are retired/dead yet the carnage and loss of total earnings in the overall career is obvious.
#96
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: Right...CL65
Posts: 279
I guess a company that doesn't operate 100 seat aircraft. Then again judging by RAH's payscale, they are a regional. I guess I haven't drawn the line yet. Either way, my idea of a regional was somewhere to get in, get the hours and get out to a major. That was my idea of an actual regional.
#97
or would it be a company that only operates aircraft in a small region of the country. even with out the 190 RAH is not a regional. Nor would I describe comair, Eagle, Skywest... or any other "regional". They are all small market/additional feed airlines or contract carriers. The only regionals still out there would be great lakes, colgan, cape air, places that dont fly halfway across the country on one flight.
#99
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 798
#100
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: Right...CL65
Posts: 279
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post