Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
10th Anniversary of Alaska Flight 261 >

10th Anniversary of Alaska Flight 261

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

10th Anniversary of Alaska Flight 261

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-2010, 06:35 AM
  #1  
Administrator
Thread Starter
 
vagabond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: C-172
Posts: 8,024
Default 10th Anniversary of Alaska Flight 261

It's difficult to believe 10 years has gone by, but the memories are still so fresh and the pain is still so raw. I hope Alaska learned from this tragedy.

From Seattle Times:

Those who lost loved ones when Alaska Airlines Flight 261 plunged into the Pacific Ocean off California have learned some hard, bitter truths in the 10 years since the crash.

They've learned that time doesn't heal all wounds, that some injustices and wrongs can never be righted. They've learned that there are human vultures and con artists who prey on grief and tragedy.

Some have found peace and acceptance, but others still burn with anger. Some say the silver linings and deeper meanings of God's plans remain mysteries to them. Many believe love does transcend death in the end.
And most have learned to live with a broken heart.

Local News | 10th anniversary of Alaska Flight 261 | Seattle Times Newspaper
vagabond is offline  
Old 01-29-2010, 09:43 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
B727DRVR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Standing in front of the tank with a shopping bag
Posts: 918
Question I heard that the jackscrew was made in China

Hey Vagabond,

Do you know if it was true that the jackscrew that failed was made in China and that they had problems with defective Chinese jackscrews before? I understand that people will buy TV's from a country with a solid history of cheapness over quality, but how about cars and those new aircraft that they are working on...

I'll stick with the good old Boeing or MD versus a new Chinese airliner, thanks anyway, China, until the value of human life in the Eastern World matches that of the West.

Take care,

B727DRVR
B727DRVR is offline  
Old 01-29-2010, 10:13 AM
  #3  
Line Holder
 
Racer X's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Position: Car Number 9
Posts: 57
Default

This accident has nothing to do with Chinese jackscrews.

Probably should let this topic rest.

Some lessons are learned the hard way, as was this one.
Racer X is offline  
Old 01-29-2010, 12:58 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TonyWilliams's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Self employed
Posts: 3,048
Default

I was working ATC radar at Burbank (SoCal Approach) when this aircraft went from east to west, between LAX and BUR, descending over the shoreline from about FL220 squawking 7700.

I thought it was some squid returning to Pt. Mugu Naval Air Station. The next month, Southwest ran off runway 8 at BUR.
TonyWilliams is offline  
Old 01-29-2010, 04:19 PM
  #5  
No one's home
 
III Corps's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,091
Default

Originally Posted by vagabond View Post
It's difficult to believe 10 years has gone by, but the memories are still so fresh and the pain is still so raw. I hope Alaska learned from this tragedy.


What lessons?

It wasn't just Alaska or one airline. The airline was following accepted and approved procedures. The FAA approved of the procedures. The jack screw was WITHIN tolerances although they were at limits. The OEM approved of the procedure. Other problems including confusion over which lubricant was and was not approved and once the lubricant can was loaded in a gun, you had no way of verifying which one it was. Over the years the inspections of the jackscrew had gone from a few hundred hours to nearly 3000 hrs.

The point is the data and incident records showed there was nothing wrong with the way things were.. much like the Shuttle launches wherein they launched outside the first window so often it gave rise to the term 'normalizing deviance' (see Diane Vaughan and Sidney Dekker).

All this to say it was a sad day. And as one hufacts wizard noted, "The amazing thing is how the evolution of an accident is so opaque while it is occuring and so obvious afterwards."
III Corps is offline  
Old 01-29-2010, 06:24 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,083
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams View Post
I was working ATC radar at Burbank...
I was flying into SFO that night. Found out what happened after we blocked in. Had to walk past the Alaska gates to get to our van. Very sobering.
XHooker is offline  
Old 01-29-2010, 08:41 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hoserpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: maddoggy dog
Posts: 1,026
Default

High school buddies dad flew that plane and wrote up a trim problem in the weeks prior to the accident. Still remember taxiing into SEA with rampers crying. Lots of non-revs on that flight. Since I'm on a maddog I still think about this accident with almost every trim warning. RIP
hoserpilot is offline  
Old 01-30-2010, 06:37 AM
  #8  
Line Holder
 
IluvRNP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: None
Posts: 67
Default

Originally Posted by III Corps View Post
[/i]

What lessons?

It wasn't just Alaska or one airline. The airline was following accepted and approved procedures. The FAA approved of the procedures. The jack screw was WITHIN tolerances although they were at limits. The OEM approved of the procedure. Other problems including confusion over which lubricant was and was not approved and once the lubricant can was loaded in a gun, you had no way of verifying which one it was. Over the years the inspections of the jackscrew had gone from a few hundred hours to nearly 3000 hrs.

The point is the data and incident records showed there was nothing wrong with the way things were.. much like the Shuttle launches wherein they launched outside the first window so often it gave rise to the term 'normalizing deviance' (see Diane Vaughan and Sidney Dekker).

All this to say it was a sad day. And as one hufacts wizard noted, "The amazing thing is how the evolution of an accident is so opaque while it is occuring and so obvious afterwards."

Probable Cause from NTSB findings:

A loss of airplane pitch control resulting from the in-flight failure of the horizontal stabilizer trim system jackscrew assembly's acme nut threads. The thread failure was caused by excessive wear resulting from Alaska Airlines' insufficient lubrication of the jackscrew assembly. Contributing to the accident were Alaska Airlines' extended lubrication interval and the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) approval of that extension, which increased the likelihood that a missed or inadequate lubrication would result in excessive wear of the acme nut threads, and Alaska Airlines' extended end play check interval and the FAA's approval of that extension, which allowed the excessive wear of the acme nut threads to progress to failure without the opportunity for detection. Also contributing to the accident was the absence on the McDonnell Douglas MD-80 of a fail-safe mechanism to prevent the catastrophic effects of total acme nut thread loss.

What I read in this, and my recollection of the events 10 years ago that the carrier and the FAA were "Frick and Frack."

All the FAA ever does is set minimum standards for air carrier operations. It has always been all carriers' responsibility to rise above FAA minimum standards.
IluvRNP is offline  
Old 01-30-2010, 06:55 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,912
Default

And the point of this thread? Resetting of a popped circuit breaker, poor maintenance by Alaska, poor oversight by the FAA, and what has happened in the past 10 years? Still poor maintenance practices by airlines and poor oversight by the FAA.

Isn’t this like a rerun of a bad movie?

Let’s move on to something new.
captjns is offline  
Old 01-30-2010, 09:59 AM
  #10  
No one's home
 
III Corps's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,091
Default

Originally Posted by IluvRNP View Post
It has always been all carriers' responsibility to rise above FAA minimum standards.
Where is that written?
III Corps is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HSLD
Major
21
09-16-2009 04:55 PM
Longbow64
Part 135
117
07-23-2009 08:46 AM
vagabond
Major
33
02-26-2009 05:44 PM
vagabond
Major
37
09-09-2008 02:19 PM
vagabond
Major
17
08-26-2008 09:30 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices