Payrate foodfight
#21
Moderator
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Except for certain aspects of the cockpit, the 320 is not newer tech. Several of the original NWA A320's have already been chopped up (88/89 deliveries, go figure).The 737NG series has a redesigned wing (25% greater area) that is more efficient than that of the 320 series. Taking off from equivalent runways, the 737-800 carries more passengers farther than the A320. As Sailingfun pointed out, there are many times where Delta 737-800's make the west coast out of JFK when JetBlue is fuel stopping. The 737-700 in Delta's configuration has substantially greater performance than the Delta A319 in runway allowable and climb limit weights plus range. The Airbus does have some significant customer advantages with a wider fuselage resulting in more internal space, and its cockpit is substantially more spacious.
The MD-88/90 are range limited when compared to either of the products above, which is why they've been moved from SLC to MSP.
The MD-88/90 are range limited when compared to either of the products above, which is why they've been moved from SLC to MSP.
Thanks for the info slowplay. And it was a gentle, friendlier analysis.
#22
Gonna have to disagree with him on the avionics part of it... my head is hurting looking at the 73N stuff. No EICAS?? really? Not to mention the cockpit ergonomics... Anyhoo... I've got a job.
As far as the payload/range- he's spot on now that I think about it. Our 738's routinely fly from JFK-SAN year round while B6 320's have to stop to catch their breath.
As far as the payload/range- he's spot on now that I think about it. Our 738's routinely fly from JFK-SAN year round while B6 320's have to stop to catch their breath.
#23
Moderator
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,252
Likes: 95
From: DAL 330
Finally the 73N has the latest crewbag destroying technology built in, with the ability to destroy even the best made crew bags (PNT & Luggage works included). 
Scoop
#24


