acl65pilot

SoCAL;

My statement was what we have been told by those within our leadership (ALPA) ranks.

I believe that there is a copy of our PWA on the file library portion of this site. Read for your self.

Our section one has many limitations on different types of operations. The point of my statement is that time and again it has been stated that the company could have a Code Share or a JV without us but it is in our best interest to have a seat at the table while they are forming the agreement.

We have specific language for the CAL Marketing agreement, the AF/KLM JV, the AS code share agreement and the Hawaiian agreement. The AS code share is a Category B operation, and that is defined in our Section one. (more to this than just AS)

It is my opinion that if the company would opt to forge a marketing agreement/code share or JV without us our PWA provides at a minimum a precedence from past agreements. I see the language as what we allow with category B operations, not what we do not allow.

Clear as mud. Like I said, go read it for yourself.

SoCalGuy

Read it shortly after Jeff's "Slap to the face"....clear as mud on my end too. I was wondering if you had the decoder ring Thx for the info.

acl65pilot

When I read it I do not see a point that states without prior approval, but what I read is what is included. Not what is prohibited. It is my opinion that if tested the legal precedence would be the history of all of the prior agreements being agreed upon.

We do have a lot of successorship and fragmentation language though!

Herkulesdrvr

my point exactly, it had nothing to do with the thread.

johnso29

Disregard.......

shiznit

Don't get too curious, 'cuz it should matter one whit. You guys deserve MUCH better than a DAL bankruptcy (plus $1)(minus the "uniqueness of the CAL operation, BOD seat, etc) contract!!!