AA and Jetblue forge new relationship
#21
Banned
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 0
From: The Beginnings
I guarantee you when legacy carrier pilots gave scope relief to the regional carriers they didn't intend to see 50% of all domestic flights be flown by them within 10-15 years. Oops.
Why do you think JetBlue changed to Sabre, a reservation system designed by none other than American Airlines? Presumably, they already had a viable system of their own. (Anecdotaly, I'd say the JetBlue-Sabre conversion sucks, but that's only because I think waiting 45 minutes on the phone to reserve a jumpseat is excessive)
Clearly, there is some long-term, strategic planning going on between the two companies. This is not about a few gate changes. It's about forming a domestic alliance. Nothing wrong with that, I guess, but it would have a significant impact on current American pilots. Probably to their detriment.
Accurate tea leaf reading is pretty much impossible, but it is fun.
#22
Oh yea, LCCs do a hell of a lot more than regionals. I meant that the reason for Eagle to exist was to feed AA int'l flights, and now JB can do that without the added cost of owning/running Eagle. In the end AMR is concerned about feeding AA/oneworld int'l flights, and Eagle's best interests don't count in that equation. APA wants Eagle shut down, and this is your chance to get rid of us. AMR wants Eagle sold off so they dont have to worry about the cost of operations, so this is an easy way of getting rid of us too.
I'd love it if everyone had a change of heart and valued Eagle as a member of AMR, but that aint gonna happen. I'm not happy to see this happen, but what can we do at Eagle to force AMR to re-think things?? We have zero leverage from our side, and are just the dog to kick when things go wrong.
I'd love it if everyone had a change of heart and valued Eagle as a member of AMR, but that aint gonna happen. I'm not happy to see this happen, but what can we do at Eagle to force AMR to re-think things?? We have zero leverage from our side, and are just the dog to kick when things go wrong.
AA
#23
American and JetBlue: Partners for the Future? - The Middle Seat Terminal - WSJ
American and JetBlue: Partners for the Future?
Airlines have been a bit like Gangs of New York lately, with several pushing hard to be the big dog in the nation’s biggest city.
Continental Airlines has tried to be biggest in New York through its Newark Liberty International Airport operation. Delta Air Lines is trying to build up two hubs, at La Guardia and Kennedy airports, trying to land more La Guardia slots and expanding its shuttle operation to New York-Chicago, for example, even though American and United already offer scads of flights in that busy market. Despite poor terminals at JFK, Delta has been expanding internationally, too.
American has a renovated terminal at JFK and, it is anticipated, a stronger relationship with British Airways if it can get antitrust immunity. And Wednesday, American announced lots of marketing initiatives in New York, including an interline agreement with jetBlue Airways, which is based at JFK.

Would he fly jetBlue as well as American?
JetBlue, which grew up as a renegade discounter offering better service at a low price, has become more and more like a traditional airline. The interline agreement with American is a first for jetBlue with a big U.S. airline–currently jetBlue has interline agreements with Lufthansa, Aer Lingus and Cape Air. Customers can get boarding passes at one stop and check baggage through to destinations.
It makes sense–jetBlue can carry lots of passengers on its domestic flights who come off or or are headed to American international flights at JFK. Discount airlines have always done this–Southwest Airlines carries lots of international passengers at Los Angeles International Airport, for example, even without interline agreements with international airlines.
And American, which has probably seen some (perhaps much) of its customer base in New York and Boston become jetBlue customers as well, can adopt a “join ‘em” instead of “fight ‘em” posture with jetBlue.
It could lead to more, of course. Code-sharing or someday even an acquisition. Who knows? The one thing that is clear – and is good for passengers – is that airlines are clearly focused on capturing loyalty in New York.
#24
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
I guarantee you when legacy carrier pilots gave scope relief to the regional carriers they didn't intend to see 50% of all domestic flights be flown by them within 10-15 years. Oops.
Why do you think JetBlue changed to Sabre, a reservation system designed by none other than American Airlines? Presumably, they already had a viable system of their own. (Anecdotaly, I'd say the JetBlue-Sabre conversion sucks, but that's only because I think waiting 45 minutes on the phone to reserve a jumpseat is excessive)
Clearly, there is some long-term, strategic planning going on between the two companies. This is not about a few gate changes. It's about forming a domestic alliance. Nothing wrong with that, I guess, but it would have a significant impact on current American pilots. Probably to their detriment.
Accurate tea leaf reading is pretty much impossible, but it is fun.
Why do you think JetBlue changed to Sabre, a reservation system designed by none other than American Airlines? Presumably, they already had a viable system of their own. (Anecdotaly, I'd say the JetBlue-Sabre conversion sucks, but that's only because I think waiting 45 minutes on the phone to reserve a jumpseat is excessive)
Clearly, there is some long-term, strategic planning going on between the two companies. This is not about a few gate changes. It's about forming a domestic alliance. Nothing wrong with that, I guess, but it would have a significant impact on current American pilots. Probably to their detriment.
Accurate tea leaf reading is pretty much impossible, but it is fun.
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
ae will undoubtedly suffer but at least it will please all the haters who refused to forge an alliance to keep it inhouse. ae may get downsized to 1000 pilots but aa will probably give up all their domestic routes in the end. pyrrhic victory!
#27
Banned
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 0
From: The Beginnings
#29
"Do it to Julia!" Orwell 1984
#30
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 749
Likes: 4
From: Blue fifi flogger
Herkulesdrvr, it's a huge deal. We're feeding AA domestically, with no organic growth on our part, and meanwhile the 1800 furloughed AA pilots don't need to be recalled since we're flying their F100 replacement. Investors win, pilots lose.


