Futile RAH/YX/F9 thread number.......8?
03-31-2010, 07:32 PM
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 131
Futile RAH/YX/F9 thread number.......8?
73 pages last time boys.
Let's see if we can play any nicer this time.
I'll start...
What's the latest on the 100 seat grievance. Is it going to arbitration? Is the 100th seat still MEL'd?
Let's see if we can play any nicer this time.
I'll start...
What's the latest on the 100 seat grievance. Is it going to arbitration? Is the 100th seat still MEL'd?
03-31-2010, 08:06 PM
#3
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 110
Originally Posted by Harry Canyon
fu·tile
[fyoot-l, fyoo-tahyl]
–adjective
1.incapable of producing any result; ineffective; useless; not successful: Attempting to force-feed the sick horse was futile.
2.trifling; frivolous; unimportant
[fyoot-l, fyoo-tahyl]
–adjective
1.incapable of producing any result; ineffective; useless; not successful: Attempting to force-feed the sick horse was futile.
2.trifling; frivolous; unimportant
03-31-2010, 11:15 PM
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 798
Originally Posted by b82rez
73 pages last time boys.
Let's see if we can play any nicer this time.
I'll start...
What's the latest on the 100 seat grievance. Is it going to arbitration? Is the 100th seat still MEL'd?
Let's see if we can play any nicer this time.
I'll start...
What's the latest on the 100 seat grievance. Is it going to arbitration? Is the 100th seat still MEL'd?
Latest I heard... the case was presented and IBT is waiting for the ruling.
04-01-2010, 08:48 AM
#5
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: ERJ 170
Posts: 737
MD80 has heard correctly. We are being told 60 to 90 days to hear the ruling. That ruling will only decide if there are indeed 100 or 99 seats on the equipment in question. We have 2 planes with 100/99 seats. If we win, we have 100 days to negotiate pay rates. Then it will go to arbitration again to decide the pay.
04-01-2010, 09:25 AM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 624
Originally Posted by G-Dog
MD80 has heard correctly. We are being told 60 to 90 days to hear the ruling. That ruling will only decide if there are indeed 100 or 99 seats on the equipment in question. We have 2 planes with 100/99 seats. If we win, we have 100 days to negotiate pay rates. Then it will go to arbitration again to decide the pay.
The arbitration isn't about a violation of Article 21.2 of your CBA?
This is an arbitration about whether or not a 100 seat aircraft actually has 100 seats?!
Seriously?
04-01-2010, 10:00 AM
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 312
Originally Posted by G-Dog
MD80 has heard correctly. We are being told 60 to 90 days to hear the ruling. That ruling will only decide if there are indeed 100 or 99 seats on the equipment in question. We have 2 planes with 100/99 seats. If we win, we have 100 days to negotiate pay rates. Then it will go to arbitration again to decide the pay.
04-01-2010, 11:24 AM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: ERJ 170
Posts: 737
Originally Posted by zoooropa
Holy cow I hope that you are kidding.
The arbitration isn't about a violation of Article 21.2 of your CBA?
This is an arbitration about whether or not a 100 seat aircraft actually has 100 seats?!
Seriously?
The arbitration isn't about a violation of Article 21.2 of your CBA?
This is an arbitration about whether or not a 100 seat aircraft actually has 100 seats?!
Seriously?
The second in command, WH, is a real piece of work. The day he retires will not come to soon. I know a lot of you guys think BB is behind all the decisions, but WH is man that drops the hammer. I am a firm believer that WH is behind all the decisions that screw the pilot groups.
04-01-2010, 02:37 PM
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,001
Originally Posted by G-Dog
I wish I was kidding, but those are the facts. Company says seat number 100 does not exists. We say it does because it is there.
'The 100th seat is MEL'd', or 'this is a CRJ 705, not a CRJ-900', or the max certified weight issue that flummoxed the Compass pilots, or the Fed Ex 777 flying without a payrate - it's not a matter of if, but when this kind of treatment will come to your property.
All of us should learn from the tricks that some carriers are pulling on their pilots, less we suffer the same fate.
04-01-2010, 03:42 PM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,754
Originally Posted by G-Dog
I wish I was kidding, but those are the facts. Company says seat number 100 does not exists. We say it does because it is there. I have said this before, welcome to RAH for those of you from XY, F9 and Lynx. I know the XY guys have had a hard time already and the F9/Lynx guys are in for some wild times.
The second in command, WH, is a real piece of work. The day he retires will not come to soon. I know a lot of you guys think BB is behind all the decisions, but WH is man that drops the hammer. I am a firm believer that WH is behind all the decisions that screw the pilot groups.
The second in command, WH, is a real piece of work. The day he retires will not come to soon. I know a lot of you guys think BB is behind all the decisions, but WH is man that drops the hammer. I am a firm believer that WH is behind all the decisions that screw the pilot groups.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
