CAL and UAL pilots

Subscribe
5  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19 
Page 15 of 22
Go to
Quote: Accomplished? You mean getting key former union people hired into overpaid management positions as a reward for selling the rank and file less than they would have otherwise been able to negotiate?
That kind of stuff was going in in the old days. The MEC Chair at Texas International had a one-day transition to vice-president of flight operations, and that was before the Lorenzo days.

Nobody likes the fact that two more recent members of the negotiating committee went to work for management, but those contracts were indeed approved by the MEC and a popular vote of the pilots. The most controversial contract, the concessionary one, passed by 58-42%.

In the meantime, our folks have taken voluntary leaves of absence to mitigate more furloughs and continued to fund the full cost of medical insurance for our 147 pilots already on the street. Nobody asks one's labor pedigree when soliciting our vote for such things.

Quote:
Only if your definition of "fair blending" means lawsuits... Talk about revisionist history.
If you're talking about the PEX lawsuit, it indeed successfully overturned the company-imposed list and resulted in Arbitrator Ross' award--which put the former PEX guys in their rightful proportion to the rest of the pilots.

Otherwise, only the Frontier guys, who did not get a fair arbitration, mounted a legal challenge. The New York Air and People Express pilots (post judge Politan) didn't. Or, perhaps you're confusing that with the litigation initiated by the Option 3 returning strikers, or the Eastern guys who sued unsuccessfully to get on our seniority list. Neither led to much.

Quote:
Now I will say my piece. I was mistaken. I thought ALPA's forgiveness of CAL scabs was a good thing for moving forward. I had even posted here, that UAL pilots needed to keep in mind that we need the scabs onboard and that they should forget and forgive too. Apparantly, I'd just been avoiding you long enough I almost forgot what your mentality is. Your few posts here nullify any good will ALPA or anyone else has sewn on your behalf. So I repent, revert and count the days you have left.
For your information, ALPA's "forgiveness" was mandated by the Order and Award, which allowed the returning strikers to come back to work. It dulled a two-edge sword. There would be no discrimination against the former strikers, nor against anybody who worked during the strike. It was further set in stone by Judge Politan's award mandating the PEX arbitration. There would be no subsequent reordering of the seniority list without court approval. That particular aspect found itself inserted into ALPA merger policy.
Quote:
I have waited for you scumbag scabs to retire my entire career. The age 65 rule change was the last and final reward for the class of '83. I have worked countless holidays and less productive trips while you have cherry picked the flying you wanted to do from the top of all the equipment prior to differential pay, while simultaneously defecating on me for asking if there was a more fair way to allocate vacations. It continues at every bid point, every day of underpaid ground school, every loose piece of contract language, in fact, just about every undesireable aspect of this career. I am now only slightly insulated because of differential pay and the fact I have out lived most of you. I've listened to the likes of you preach how you saved the airline and that I am lucky to have a job. I've listened to your self excusing flawed logic from both the right seat and your jumpseat. I've bit my tongue in the school house knowing the retribution I would suffer at the hands of your peers for speaking my mind. WE HAVE ALL (pilots industry wide) suffered the ripple effects of your rolling over to management - suffered in virtually every aspect of this industry because of your actions way back in '83 and what you and your very small cancerous brothers set into motion.
Well, sorry for all the bad things that have come your way, but you certainly seem to be placing a lot of blame for what happened to you on a very small group of people.

In 1985, you guys were on top of the world. Those of us who worked, or returned to work, during the two-year Continental strike had nothing to do with United's failed ESOP and all the money you guys lost. Some of our folks found out about that folly when they invested in Pride Air.

It had nothing to do with economic conditions that came after 9/11, nor the bankruptcy termination of your defined benefit plan. It had nothing to do with your brother and sister pilots being on the street in numbers that top a thousand these days. It had nothing to do with that federal judge's ruling against your slowdown in 2008.

We also had comparatively little to do with the changing of the age 60 rule. As you'll recall, ALPA reversed itself and lobbied heavily for such a change on behalf of all the airline pilots who had lost their entire retirement plans. The biggest lobbying group was United's pilots, and our own John Prater courted your vote with a vengeance.

Life hasn't gone very well for the 800-pound gorilla since your ruled the zoo in the mid-1980s. Sorry about that, but if I were you, I'd look inward.
Quote:
I will most certainly be there when YOUR retirement flight blocks in, where upon I will turn my back and leave you to your legacy.
And I'm supposed to get upset about this?
Reply
Quote: I disagree,

Career expectations is 1/3 of the formula equally weighted with seat and longevity. And as others have shown, career expectations is very subjective. Both sides feel they have more expectations.

ALPA merger policy will mean everything to the arbitrator as it is the template he will use to build a list.

Longevity will most likely be as you say, and once the method is determined a list based on longevity will be crystal clear.

Using your example, it is anyone's guess as to how to place someone with 11 years and bottom of seat versus someone with 5 years and 50% in seat. Longevity and seat are equally weighted under the policy. That is what an arbitrator is for.

HS
Small correction....the merger policy clearly says the areas that must be used (longevity, career expectations, status and category)are considered in no particular order or weight.
Reply
Quote: Life hasn't gone very well for the 800-pound gorilla since your ruled the zoo in the mid-1980s... And I'm supposed to get upset about this?
I think you are mistakenly thinking I am a United pilot.
Reply
My favorite story. Years ago I'm flying with a prim and proper ex Braniff fleet qual 75. We have a fed in the jumpseat. I asked the fed what he did. He said he was in an autonomous group that wrote fitness reports on airlines. I asked if there were any airlines he had concerns about. He mentioned one carrier due to the tension level in the cockpit when flying with a s&!$. I looked at my cAPT and the veins were starting to show in his neck. Then the fed said, and I quote, you know, the only way a s$!& can get a major airline job is to cross a picket line. They aren't good enough to get it the normal way. I about sliced my tongue off to keep from laughing. The cAPT didn't say a word to the fed for the next 3 hrs. I don't know how, but the fed had to have known.
Reply
Quote: Isn't that just warm and fuzzy. The nice scab wants to buy you lunch. What a tool, typical scab.
Dude!!!
The CAL Strike was "upmteen" MOONS ago. None of us is perfect. If you were all that concerned with strikebreakers you might want to remember the "fleet qualified" Capt's and FO's hired during our 1985 strike.
Some of those who might remain after 25years are probably just as FEW in numbers as those who struck in 1985 and in 1982 at CAL. Isn't there a BIGGER fish to fry here?? Y'think?? I DO understand how you feel. I've worked with guys who went to Canada during the Viet Nam war,while I served my country and Like to got my Butt shot off in the process. Are we going to fight the civil WAR all over again and again?? Are you Very sure you're NOT a bigger man than that?? It takes a Pretty Big man to admit he can forgive.. Don't you think you might be Just that BIG?? It takes a LOT of UnNecessary effort to hate on somebody. I MIGHT be getting OLD or just plain LAZY! But it's just too much WORK to hate, Think about it!
G.B.Y.
Reply
Quote: Dude!!!
The CAL Strike was "upmteen" MOONS ago. None of us is perfect. If you were all that concerned with strikebreakers you might want to remember the "fleet qualified" Capt's and FO's hired during our 1985 strike.
Some of those who might remain after 25years are probably just as FEW in numbers as those who struck in 1985 and in 1982 at CAL. Isn't there a BIGGER fish to fry here?? Y'think?? I DO understand how you feel. I've worked with guys who went to Canada during the Viet Nam war,while I served my country and Like to got my Butt shot off in the process. Are we going to fight the civil WAR all over again and again?? Are you Very sure you're NOT a bigger man than that?? It takes a Pretty Big man to admit he can forgive.. Don't you think you might be Just that BIG?? It takes a LOT of UnNecessary effort to hate on somebody. I MIGHT be getting OLD or just plain LAZY! But it's just too much WORK to hate, Think about it!
G.B.Y.
First of all calm down, and with your "Dude!!!" salutation, you seem a little immature in spite of your age. Who said anything about hate? You must have been reflecting upon your own emotions at some point in your career. I don't hate anyone. At the same time, I don't have to like someone who steals another's job and then spends the rest of his/her career rationalizing why it's okay. The overall majority of them are $hitty pilots to begin with, pretty weird in general, and tend to cost the company more money in the long-run. But that is okay because the company knows the sc@b$ are a thorn in the pilot backside. The fact that the strike was years ago is irrelevant - as long as the opportunists are on the property it is an issue. And the fact that ALPA caved for the sake of dues income is sad to say the least.

Remember - a leopard can't change its spots and a sc@b will sc@b again given the opportunity. No forgiveness.
Reply
Quote: My favorite story. Years ago I'm flying with a prim and proper ex Braniff fleet qual 75. We have a fed in the jumpseat. I asked the fed what he did. He said he was in an autonomous group that wrote fitness reports on airlines. I asked if there were any airlines he had concerns about. He mentioned one carrier due to the tension level in the cockpit when flying with a s&!$. I looked at my cAPT and the veins were starting to show in his neck. Then the fed said, and I quote, you know, the only way a s$!& can get a major airline job is to cross a picket line. They aren't good enough to get it the normal way. I about sliced my tongue off to keep from laughing. The cAPT didn't say a word to the fed for the next 3 hrs. I don't know how, but the fed had to have known.
Yep - hilarious.
Reply
Crossing a picket line is complete BS, but it is funny to see people yelling that they stole jobs, which they did, while ual hired all those unqualified minorities. I don't want to fly with them either. They stole jobs from the qualified bunch because they could check a box different then most of us.
Reply
Quote: I disagree,

Career expectations is 1/3 of the formula equally weighted with seat and longevity. And as others have shown, career expectations is very subjective. Both sides feel they have more expectations.

ALPA merger policy will mean everything to the arbitrator as it is the template he will use to build a list.

Longevity will most likely be as you say, and once the method is determined a list based on longevity will be crystal clear.

Using your example, it is anyone's guess as to how to place someone with 11 years and bottom of seat versus someone with 5 years and 50% in seat. Longevity and seat are equally weighted under the policy. That is what an arbitrator is for.

HS
It's actually pretty simple. CAL pilots want relative seniority+ career expectations and UAL wants DOH. Therefore straight relative seniority is the intelligent compromise. Nobody hurt(or as little as possible) and no windfalls.

You really think there are UAL guys that think they have greater career expectations, seriously????
Reply
Quote: and later, the 11 year bottom feeder upgrades to 777 captain BEFORE the 5 year guy because the 11 year guy's airline has twice as many 777s. You see, career expectations aren't so crystal clear either.

[html]ALPA merger policy means nothing when it goes to an arbitrator[/html] That is completely false. The Arbitrators have in the past and will most certainly consider ALPA merger policy when arriving at their decision. They MAY consider other factors as well, however, and the policy says so.
Wow, you are clueless. The 5 year guy has been captain for 15 years before the other upgrades to his old, oil dripping 777, factor that into career expectations. Now its clearing up for you.
Reply
5  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19 
Page 15 of 22
Go to