![]() |
It is a good deal at someone's expense, namely another pilot.
|
Originally Posted by LeineLodge
(Post 838738)
I don't understand the politically correct memos that come out such as the one yesterday. I realize there is a process, but what is so wrong with saying "We are not willing to budge on scope, at all." I did not get a warm and fuzzy feeling reading that memo.
While I do think we were in the loop conceptually, developing a consensus response takes time. I could not have written it better myself. |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 838755)
It is a good deal at someone's expense, namely another pilot.
I think it is more our responsibility since it is within our control. Expecting everyone to refuse to work at GoJets is just unrealistic. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 838757)
Who negotiated and ratified the good deal?
I think it is more our responsibility since it is within our control. Expecting everyone to refuse to work at GoJets is just unrealistic. We have discussed this scenario many times. |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 838708)
There are many pilots what would be more than happy to see progression at their current regional job than to come over to mainline as well. We as pilots are our own worst enemies.
"Hey Mr. Jumpseater, who are you with?" "ASA" "Were you going to apply to Delta?" "Well, I'm thinking about it, I'm not sure, you know right now, and my wife is, and I have pretty good seniority, I've been here 10 years, and well I don't know, I'm a Captain now..." "How much do you make?" "$78 an hour." "You'll be back there by year 2." But you know what, if you don't want it then don't bother. There are plenty of people who want it, we'll bend over backwards for people who want it, and frankly see OH as a warning and not a 'ha ha'.
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 838760)
That was not the point. Point is that these "Super Regionals" want to get to the scope and size where their route structures and circumnavigate mainline PWA's. That would be at your expense.
We have discussed this scenario many times. Its like looking at one of those darn Magic Eyes. FWIW, if I were a regional airline right now I'd be saying the same thing Delta said "we want out of the RJ business." |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 838798)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 100% ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Hey Mr. Jumpseater, who are you with?" "ASA" "Were you going to apply to Delta?" "Well, I'm thinking about it, I'm not sure, you know right now, and my wife is, and I have pretty good seniority, I've been here 10 years, and well I don't know, I'm a Captain now..." "How much do you make?" "$78 an hour." "You'll be back there by year 2." But you know what, if you don't want it then don't bother. There are plenty of people who want it, we'll bend over backwards for people who want it, and frankly see OH as a warning and not a 'ha ha'. I am interesting in tieing these 5 things together: the lessons DAL has probably learned from RAH and funding their growing competition, the "we want out of the RJ business" comments from up high, the Continental Express LAX risk sharing system, not finding anyone to bid on buying OH, and this Compass and Mesaba sale to none other than TSH. Its like looking at one of those darn Magic Eyes. FWIW, if I were a regional airline right now I'd be saying the same thing Delta said "we want out of the RJ business." With that being said, as a regional pilot, I will be the first one to support the taking back of 50+ seat flying for mainline and I will also be the first one to jump ship to a brighter future the first opportunity I get. Ask me in seven years when I am in my 40's and you might get a different opinion. |
Originally Posted by jayray2
(Post 838820)
This discussion of moving on to a Major vs. staying at a Regional has played out many times before. The damage to the industry was not anyone's fault. You cannot blame the current generation of regional pilots. Most wanted to move up and now the opportunity is coming too late. You can not fault someone for looking out for their own best interest. Moving up to a Major and commuting for the last 15 years of one's career, a majority of which will be spent in the left seat mind you, in today's uncertainty is dubious at best. I hear the conversation you quoted above all the time and I always have to agree that staying at a Regional is usually the best case. Job security is probably better sitting at the top 20% of a Regional than the bottom 5% of a major. Many are well on there way to a 6 digit salary, finally a good amount of vacation, 18 days off, 125% matching 401K, it is hard to make an argument for someone in their mid 40's to move on.
With that being said, as a regional pilot, I will be the first one to support the taking back of 50+ seat flying for mainline and I will also be the first one to jump ship to a brighter future the first opportunity I get. Ask me in seven years when I am in my 40's and you might get a different opinion. If we are comparing moving on to a major and staying at a regional, I don't understand the sentence in bold. Sitting in the right seat for 25 years at a major in the smallest equipment in the base you want to live in will still pay more in a career than being the #1 guy on the largest RJ at a regional airline. I don't get it. Yes many will commute to fly captain on a widebody for the last few years of a career to maximize retirement etc. but many do the opposite. Several guys I fly with in IAH on the 757/767 were 777 CA's commuting to EWR. They have only 5 years left to 65 and want to fly more domestic and limit their overseas flying so they can coast through their final years. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
No vote. Reasoning:
* What if during a downturn Delta can not finance $45,000,000 for each 11 jobs? * The CASM makes the E175 / E195 superior platform to the MD88 and in some cases is a replacement for the Airbus and 737NG. What if Delta decided to replace the MD88 fleet? * If things get really ugly, what is easier to modify, (or toss out: (Arbitrary Limit) or (Seniority List) pick one. As a union, our strongest job advancement position is unity. We have watched one convoluted line in the sand after another fail. Why would we wish to repeat what has not worked? We should apply objective stress tests to our proposals. - Would this provision allow one division of Delta to furlough pilots while another division is hiring? - Would this provision create jobs which are not represented by D-ALPA and pilots who could challenge our exclusivity on Delta flying? - Does this proposal honor Delta pilot seniority? - Will this proposal increase the number of Delta pilot jobs? - Will this proposal in any way harm ANYONE on the Delta seniority list? Scope is easy when we are growing. Scope has to be built for worst case scenarios. Exactly, Bar. sailing's line of reasoning is exactly what got us in this scope mess in the first place. Short sighted vs. long view... sailing.. you really need to think about what you typed. |
Originally Posted by IAHB756
(Post 838832)
If we are comparing moving on to a major and staying at a regional, I don't understand the sentence in bold. Sitting in the right seat for 25 years at a major in the smallest equipment in the base you want to live in will still pay more in a career than being the #1 guy on the largest RJ at a regional airline. I don't get it. Yes many will commute to fly captain on a widebody for the last few years of a career to maximize retirement etc. but many do the opposite. Several guys I fly with in IAH on the 757/767 were 777 CA's commuting to EWR. They have only 5 years left to 65 and want to fly more domestic and limit their overseas flying so they can coast through their final years.
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 838842)
Exactly, Bar.
sailing's line of reasoning is exactly what got us in this scope mess in the first place. Short sighted vs. long view... sailing.. you really need to think about what you typed. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:02 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands