Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Major (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/)
-   -   Southwest flight attendant takes baby (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/52890-southwest-flight-attendant-takes-baby.html)

shiznit 08-19-2010 04:41 AM


Originally Posted by FAULTPUSH (Post 857747)
And nowhere near the paycheck that the lady will get. We reportedly settled for 6 figures to a lady who was beating her kids on a flight.

That sucks.....

I like the "SWA LUV" though and hope you guys can keep it alive.

chuck416 08-20-2010 02:51 PM


Originally Posted by Red Forman (Post 857247)
This is why you should have to have a certain IQ in order to reproduce.


Do you seriously believe that being a loving, caring, stable parent has a direct correlation to IQ? I submit that intellect has just about zero direct correlation with perpetration of one person's hatred upon another. Seems to be much more of a spiritual dynamic. Color me crazy if you will....
chuck

OscartheGrouch 08-21-2010 08:43 AM


Originally Posted by Royer (Post 857446)
I read the headline yesterday, and before I even read the article I knew it was SWA. Greyhound prices = Grehound passengers.

Well Royer, that was very profound. As a SWA employee, a frequent flyer on DAL and while jumpseating on other carriers I can honestly say that the greyhound passengers are at every airline. While not a scientific study on my part I would challenge anyone to dispute it by actual demographic studies of your passenger base. Are you actually new to APC or are you re- entering the fight with a new call sign?:rolleyes:

The Oscar

757upspilot 08-21-2010 08:57 AM


Originally Posted by OscartheGrouch (Post 858913)
Well Royer, that was very profound. As a SWA employee, a frequent flyer on DAL and while jumpseating on other carriers I can honestly say that the greyhound passengers are at every airline. While not a scientific study on my part I would challenge anyone to dispute it by actual demographic studies of your passenger base. Are you actually new to APC or are you re- entering the fight with a new call sign?:rolleyes:

The Oscar

How about a study of the demographics before and after de regulation and where the original demographic is flying now. Its such a pain to fly on the Pax Carriers we have people jumpseating on a freighter instead of taking a ticket on the Pax.

duvie 08-22-2010 10:34 AM


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 857711)
It is a GREYHOUND paycheck.....It just doesn't feel like one since others' paychecks have dropped to "Trailways" levels....

Tell me the last time a third year greyhound driver made six figures :o They're paid well over there, no real way around that.

Scoop 08-22-2010 12:52 PM


Originally Posted by OscartheGrouch (Post 858913)
Well Royer, that was very profound. As a SWA employee, a frequent flyer on DAL and while jumpseating on other carriers I can honestly say that the greyhound passengers are at every airline. While not a scientific study on my part I would challenge anyone to dispute it by actual demographic studies of your passenger base. Are you actually new to APC or are you re- entering the fight with a new call sign?:rolleyes:

The Oscar


As a DAL Pilot I can vouch for Oscar - Delta has our share of seemingly moronic passengers.

Scoop

oldfr8dog 08-22-2010 06:26 PM

What's up with all the Greyhound bashing? When I was a kid my dream was to grow up and drive a bus for them. Alas, it didn't work out. :rolleyes:

CHQ Pilot 08-22-2010 06:53 PM


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 857877)
That sucks.....

I like the "SWA LUV" though and hope you guys can keep it alive.

I don't think FAULTPUSH works for SWA, but none the less, I'm sure we will pay out big. I don't remember the exact figure that SWA pays out each year in settlements or free travel (some have received several years for free I was told), but I do remember thinking to myself that it was a lot of money. I wish we had a backbone sometimes, but the company has chosen a path that it is better to settle than expend money on legal costs. Airlines are perceived as cash cows so it seems anyone will try and get money out of them.

caflyer 08-22-2010 08:18 PM


Originally Posted by CHQ Pilot (Post 859541)
I wish we had a backbone sometimes, but the company has chosen a path that it is better to settle than expend money on legal costs. Airlines are perceived as cash cows so it seems anyone will try and get money out of them.

I would have to credit Southwest for taking the high road this time.
My guess is the the F/As did not make the desicion to look out for the baby's welfare and removing this child from the parent lightly, but did it anyway.
I have nothing but praise for the staff and the airline for doing this.

Zoot Suit 08-22-2010 09:33 PM

Had this been my child I would have hired a VERY good lawyer and sued the airline AND the F/A who did this bigtime. I would also try to get the F/A arrested for kidnapping.

Once again it seems the second you step on an aircraft, all your civil rights seem to be left at the airport. Tell me what right a F/A has to take MY child away from me. Does she know the medical history of my child? I hope the airline pays out big for this and it NEVER happenes again. I probably would have been arrested for assault if ANYONE on an airplane tried to take away my child.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:55 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands