Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Northwest flight attendants BLOCKED >

Northwest flight attendants BLOCKED

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Northwest flight attendants BLOCKED

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-25-2006 | 12:22 PM
  #1  
RockBottom's Avatar
Thread Starter
Fun Officer
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Texas
Default Northwest flight attendants BLOCKED

Northwest Flight Attendants Temporarily Blocked From Striking

By Tom Becker

Aug. 25 (Bloomberg) -- Northwest Airlines Corp. flight attendants were temporarily blocked from striking tonight, while a U.S. judge considers the bankrupt carrier's request to permanently bar a work stoppage.

U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero in New York today issued a temporary order that bars a strike. Marrero delayed a decision on Northwest's appeal of an Aug. 17 ruling by a bankruptcy judge who said he had no power to stop the labor action.

The case is In re Northwest Airlines Corp., 05-17930 U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York.

To contact the reporter on this story: Tom Becker in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New York at [email protected]
Last Updated: August 25, 2006 15:12 EDT
Reply
Old 08-25-2006 | 12:32 PM
  #2  
CVG767A's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
From: 767ER capt
Default

That sucks. I hope the judge, upon consideration of the facts of the case, ultimately allows them their right to strike. If a company has the right to impose terms of employment, employees should have the right to collectively withhold their services.

D'Angelo, don't bother replying to this.
Reply
Old 08-25-2006 | 12:34 PM
  #3  
Eric Stratton's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 0
Default

time to redo the RLA seen as how no one can ever strike unless the company wants them too...
Reply
Old 08-25-2006 | 12:44 PM
  #4  
FlyerJosh's Avatar
Chief Jeppesen Updater
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,080
Likes: 0
From: Executive Transport Driver
Default

If this decision stands, it's a serious blow to the RLA. The only "self-help" that union members would have at their disposal under these circumstances is a mass resignation, with the hopes that enough walk off the job to shut down the airline (unlikely). And that would be more self-defeating that a strike that might close a company's doors for good.

Sorry to see this decision- hopefully at some point common sense will prevail on all sides of the issue (union/management/public)...
Reply
Old 08-25-2006 | 01:16 PM
  #5  
tomgoodman's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,248
Likes: 0
From: 767A (Ret)
Default Temporary block

I think the judge "punted", hoping that a deal will be reached and he won't have to "make new law". He just got the case a few days ago, so there is some merit in his stated need to study the issues more extensively.
Reply
Old 08-25-2006 | 01:48 PM
  #6  
Eric Stratton's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,002
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tomgoodman
I think the judge "punted", hoping that a deal will be reached and he won't have to "make new law". He just got the case a few days ago, so there is some merit in his stated need to study the issues more extensively.
I'm betting the other judge had time to study it before he made the ruling...
Reply
Old 08-25-2006 | 02:29 PM
  #7  
paladin's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: Over 60 and Still Living the Dream
Default

Originally Posted by CVG767A
If a company has the right to impose terms of employment, employees should have the right to collectively withhold their services.
They do; they can quit. I have to agree with "Eric Stratton", it is way past time for new legislation that would serve as arbiter for the myriad issues that surround the rights of labor as well as those who have a stake in the private ownership of the means of production. However, isn't that where the paradox lies because employees have a big stake in the profitability of the corporations for which they are employed? Maybe it is time for airline pilots represented by ALPA to reevaluate the merits and practicality of national representation and jettison the collectivism that is masquerading as some kind of sacrosanct brotherhood. ALPA "leadership" has been eating their young for generations.

Last edited by paladin; 08-25-2006 at 02:40 PM.
Reply
Old 08-25-2006 | 07:15 PM
  #8  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
From: FO dhc-6
Default

why dont they just do massive sickouts
Reply
Old 08-25-2006 | 07:21 PM
  #9  
TonyC's Avatar
Organizational Learning 
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,948
Likes: 0
From: Directly behind the combiner
Default

Originally Posted by Eric Stratton

time to redo the RLA seen as how no one can ever strike unless the company wants them too...
The problem is NOT the RLA.


The problem is our entire legal system. THAT needs a major overhaul.




.
Reply
Old 08-26-2006 | 07:48 AM
  #10  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by paladin
They do; they can quit. I have to agree with "Eric Stratton", it is way past time for new legislation that would serve as arbiter for the myriad issues that surround the rights of labor as well as those who have a stake in the private ownership of the means of production. However, isn't that where the paradox lies because employees have a big stake in the profitability of the corporations for which they are employed? Maybe it is time for airline pilots represented by ALPA to reevaluate the merits and practicality of national representation and jettison the collectivism that is masquerading as some kind of sacrosanct brotherhood. ALPA "leadership" has been eating their young for generations.
Hey lets just take the salaries of all of ALPA top management and split it up among the members. My dues would be better off in a retirement savings account.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
redbaron84
Major
1
12-25-2005 09:49 PM
captain_drew
Major
0
08-19-2005 03:16 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
06-15-2005 05:12 AM
Sir James
Major
2
03-17-2005 04:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices