Why Layovers?

Reply Subscribe

Page 2 of 2

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

09-15-2006 | 05:06 AM

#11

Pharaoh

On Reserve

Joined: Apr 2006

Posts: 17

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by B757200ER

At least we don't have to re-fuel inflight, eh?

Don't give them any ideas...the last thing I want to see is BDL-PDX in a CRJ ...

Last edited by Pharaoh; 09-15-2006 at 05:13 AM.

09-15-2006 | 05:18 PM

#12

check6

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Nov 2005

Posts: 177

Likes: 0

From: 737FO

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1Seat 1Engine

Sit down with a pencil and build a real schedule...it will become obvious that you can't run an airline without layovers.

I used to do that when I was a kid.

09-16-2006 | 06:18 PM

#13

BCDurbin

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Jul 2005

Posts: 295

Likes: 0

From: 717 FO >>>> 737 FO

Unless you have ALOT of bases you can't bring all your aircraft back to a Base. And alot of times it's cheaper to overnight an aircraft at a smaller airport than at a Hub.

09-16-2006 | 06:42 PM

#14

PILOTGUY

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Jun 2005

Posts: 522

Likes: 0

I LOVE hotels!!! Superlong showers....at no cost to me. A/C whereever you want it. New towns to explore, etc. I also like being away from my wife for 2 or 3 days.....might be why the honeymoon has not stopped after 11 years.

09-16-2006 | 06:52 PM

#15

rickair7777

Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts: 44,931

Likes: 701

From: Engines Turn or People Swim

Quote:

Originally Posted by PILOTGUY

There is something to be said for that...the navy was TOO long, you had to start the whole relationship all over, but 4-5 days is just about right.

09-17-2006 | 05:11 AM

#16

JerrySpringer

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Feb 2006

Posts: 441

Likes: 0

From: 747RJ

Quote:

Originally Posted by MikeB525

This thought came up when I was talking with a friend today: Why has there always been a tradition of having crews layover at a place away from their base? This is one of the biggest complaints amongst pilots.

So why is it done? Why are pilot schedules designed to have layovers? If you think about it, it costs the airline ALOT of money in hotel costs. To layover a 737 crew you need to rent 5 hotel rooms. If crew schedules were to focus more on day trips and minimize schedules requiring overnights, wouldn't it then be a win-win for both the crews and the company (flightcrew get more nights at home, company saves a ton of money on hotel costs)?

so....?

Certain airlines, like Colgan, do just that. It's called outstation basing. The rub is, you have to live where the airplane lives. Not bad if the plane lives where you do. Follow me? Now, the airplane moves, and you have to move to. More aptly, the comany has to move you. This usually costs more than the hotel rooms they buy.