Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

MEL Balancing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-2011 | 07:35 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
From: Reclined
Default MEL Balancing

Just wondering how many - if any - carriers have pilots balancing their own MEL entries? I'm hearing they are making our owned regional start doing it on the premise that many others do it; so I was wondering who else actually does that?
Reply
Old 05-29-2011 | 07:45 AM
  #2  
Justdoinmyjob's Avatar
Looking for a laugh
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 4,099
Likes: 0
Default

What do you mean by "Balancing?" Is that the same thing as a "Flight Crew Placard?"

I'll be damned if imma put that book on my head and walk around. The hat is bad enough.
Reply
Old 05-29-2011 | 08:28 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,497
Likes: 66
From: MD-11 FO
Default

If you're talking about doing the MEL procedure (placarding) ourselves, as pilots, XJT has done it for years and Colgan did it when I was there, too. We have the procedure outlined in our book and MX Control gives us the control # and sign-off. Saves a lot of time at the outstations. They even allow us to accomplish (M) items, so long as it doesn't involve special tools or skills (i.e. pulling and collaring circuit breakers).
Reply
Old 05-29-2011 | 08:40 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by EMBFlyer
If you're talking about doing the MEL procedure (placarding) ourselves, as pilots, XJT has done it for years and Colgan did it when I was there, too. We have the procedure outlined in our book and MX Control gives us the control # and sign-off. Saves a lot of time at the outstations. They even allow us to accomplish (M) items, so long as it doesn't involve special tools or skills (i.e. pulling and collaring circuit breakers).
Id be careful doing that at 9L. My last oral included a whole deal about MELs including one simple one, that could EASILY have been taken care of by the PIC, however it had an (M) and the check airman was looking for us to say "Maintenance must do it," not us.
Reply
Old 05-29-2011 | 08:56 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by v1valarob
Id be careful doing that at 9L. My last oral included a whole deal about MELs including one simple one, that could EASILY have been taken care of by the PIC, however it had an (M) and the check airman was looking for us to say "Maintenance must do it," not us.
I imagine the check airman has probably never read the preamble in your MEL.
Reply
Old 05-29-2011 | 08:57 AM
  #6  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by v1valarob
Id be careful doing that at 9L. My last oral included a whole deal about MELs including one simple one, that could EASILY have been taken care of by the PIC, however it had an (M) and the check airman was looking for us to say "Maintenance must do it," not us.
I think he is at XE, not 9L.
Reply
Old 05-29-2011 | 09:26 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Default

He is asking if there are any other airlines out there that have the flight crew defer an item per an MEL and document it in the logbook like this:

Problem: overhead reading light seat 4B inop

corrective action: overhead reading light seat 4B deferred per MEL 21-18

The captain fills out both the problem and the corrective action part of the log book and MELs the light. Maintenance does not need to get involved until the MEL expires.

This is done at outstations and hubs with maintenance while the mechanics sit in the break room and watch basketball. American Eagle is the only airline I know that does this.

What I don't like is that there are many things that are MELable that are an indication of more problems. An example would be on an APU start with a bad GPU you can get the Autopilot/yaw damper fail which on the Embraer is an indication of an IC 600 taking a dump. The autopilot and yaw damper are MELable but the IC 600 is not and can lead to big problems down the road.
Reply
Old 05-29-2011 | 09:37 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by shfo
He is asking if there are any other airlines out there that have the flight crew defer an item per an MEL and document it in the logbook like this:

Problem: overhead reading light seat 4B inop

corrective action: overhead reading light seat 4B deferred per MEL 21-18

The captain fills out both the problem and the corrective action part of the log book and MELs the light. Maintenance does not need to get involved until the MEL expires.

This is done at outstations and hubs with maintenance while the mechanics sit in the break room and watch basketball. American Eagle is the only airline I know that does this.

What I don't like is that there are many things that are MELable that are an indication of more problems. An example would be on an APU start with a bad GPU you can get the Autopilot/yaw damper fail which on the Embraer is an indication of an IC 600 taking a dump. The autopilot and yaw damper are MELable but the IC 600 is not and can lead to big problems down the road.
We can do it for certain items at Delta.
Reply
Old 05-29-2011 | 09:40 AM
  #9  
grnclvrs's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by shfo
He is asking if there are any other airlines out there that have the flight crew defer an item per an MEL and document it in the logbook like this:

Problem: overhead reading light seat 4B inop

corrective action: overhead reading light seat 4B deferred per MEL 21-18

The captain fills out both the problem and the corrective action part of the log book and MELs the light. Maintenance does not need to get involved until the MEL expires.

This is done at outstations and hubs with maintenance while the mechanics sit in the break room and watch basketball. American Eagle is the only airline I know that does this.

What I don't like is that there are many things that are MELable that are an indication of more problems. An example would be on an APU start with a bad GPU you can get the Autopilot/yaw damper fail which on the Embraer is an indication of an IC 600 taking a dump. The autopilot and yaw damper are MELable but the IC 600 is not and can lead to big problems down the road.
Delta, Colgan, and Allegiant do it. As far as your example goes, I used to be a mechanic and when I show up to defer your autopilot and yaw damper I couldn't give a crap about your IC 600 unless the MEL says to look at it.
Reply
Old 05-29-2011 | 09:58 AM
  #10  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

I'm confused about what "balancing" means, is the question whether there are airlines that allow their crews to write something up and per MX permission MEL it in the logbook and then placard it and high five the next crew with news the autothrottles and FMS are on MEL?

Surely every airline has an MEL procedure that doesn't involve a mechanic coming to the airplane don't they?

Originally Posted by v1valarob
Id be careful doing that at 9L. My last oral included a whole deal about MELs including one simple one, that could EASILY have been taken care of by the PIC, however it had an (M) and the check airman was looking for us to say "Maintenance must do it," not us.

If you google MMEL FAA, it will come up with the Flight Standards IMS page in which you can pull up the FAA's Master MEL book for any aircraft. In there is this under definitions:

15. "(M)" symbol indicates a requirement for a specific maintenance procedure which must be accomplished prior to operation with the listed item inoperative. Normally these procedures are accomplished by maintenance personnel; however, other personnel may be qualified and authorized to perform certain functions. Procedures requiring specialized knowledge or skill, or requiring the use of tools or test equipment should be accomplished by maintenance personnel. The satisfactory accomplishment of all maintenance procedures, regardless of who performs them, is the responsibility of the operator. Appropriate procedures are required to be published as part of the operator's manual or MEL.


^^ That was from the BAE146, where you can MEL one of the 5 APUs. I lie.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Stallog
Technical
5
05-05-2011 03:17 AM
Plane5150
Fractional
1
09-26-2010 12:09 PM
dolsanddays
Technical
7
01-31-2009 01:01 AM
ImperialxRat
Career Questions
7
03-16-2007 07:05 AM
FlyerJosh
Corporate
0
06-08-2006 08:20 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices