BB applies to remove single carrier status
#1
BB applies to remove single carrier status
........… loa67 thank you
Last edited by seattlepilot; 06-24-2011 at 05:38 AM.
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 298
For the uniformed/outsiders what is the chances this actually happens? How long till whipsaw occurs?
#3
Line Holder
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 57
Dunno, and dunno. I will say that the whipsaw will be no different than that of Delta whipsawing mainline pilots and regional carrier pilots against each other. So far BB has made good on everything he has promised. Could he be turning over a new leaf?
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 298
I also would have voted no on concessions too, I think they were immaterial in landing the NEO order. Clearly that had been in the works for awhile, multi million dollar deals like that don't happen in a week. Further, Bedford needs to learn how to solve the revenue problem at F9, which is what is really killing the airline. Subsidizing his poor management skills is a temporary solution.
#5
I've never met the man and never worked for him but he impresses me as the next Lorenzo. I'd personally be very wary of giving him two separate seniority lists.
I also would have voted no on concessions too, I think they were immaterial in landing the NEO order. Clearly that had been in the works for awhile, multi million dollar deals like that don't happen in a week. Further, Bedford needs to learn how to solve the revenue problem at F9, which is what is really killing the airline. Subsidizing his poor management skills is a temporary solution.
I also would have voted no on concessions too, I think they were immaterial in landing the NEO order. Clearly that had been in the works for awhile, multi million dollar deals like that don't happen in a week. Further, Bedford needs to learn how to solve the revenue problem at F9, which is what is really killing the airline. Subsidizing his poor management skills is a temporary solution.
#6
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
Have no real idea, but could BB fly 320's at RAH and under their agreements or is there really two way scope involved. Does RAH have a "no RJ's at Frontier" clause and does Frontier have a "no airbus at RAH" clause?
#7
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
I'm sure RAH pilots will clarify, but I believe RAH pilots contract states that all aircraft be flown by RAH pilots. The single carrier status(which is from a representation view only) forces integration of the operations and prevents whipsaw. This is exactly what BB wants to stop.
#8
Line Holder
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 60
Don't worry, the FAPA trolls will be posting on here soon to answer all of your questions, I'm surprised they have let a RAH topic go for so long without chiming in.
Also: johnso29, you are correct.
#9
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 260
Request DENIED. Nothing to see here people.......
Except maybe "The IBT additionally states that it may later pursue allegations
of election interference in this matter."
Dear FAPA, you are amazing.
Except maybe "The IBT additionally states that it may later pursue allegations
of election interference in this matter."
Dear FAPA, you are amazing.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post