Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
The Cyclical ways of aviation >

The Cyclical ways of aviation


Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

The Cyclical ways of aviation

Old 10-25-2006 | 12:15 AM
  #11  
CVG767A's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
From: 767ER capt
Default

Originally Posted by duvie
Pilots do try to milk every penny from management. I bet if management offered pilots a 25% increase across the board the pilot group of any major would accept it. The way the game works is simple. Pilots push management to get the highest wages possible, regardless of the airline's financial situation, and management has to decide how much they can afford to give the pilots after they've cashed the paychecks for the company officers and VPs. So basically they're greedy and we're stupid. I wonder why four of the six legacy carriers have been in bankrupcy in the last three years.
Clear, concise, simple, and wrong.
Reply
Old 10-26-2006 | 09:55 PM
  #12  
robthree's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
From: 777, sofa
Default Historical pay rates

Doing a little web surfing, I have not been able to locate any hard data on historical pay rates, but I did find a couple items of intrest. The first is a message board with TWA pilots discussing thier rate of pay as newhires circa 1967.(1) Which is a convienent date as it is the base year for the CPI (CPI=100). The second is a cover page from an article written in 1953 for Industrial and Labor Relations Review. (2) It indicates that pilot wages range from $8000 to $11000, and questions the need of unions for employees who make so much!
The CPI data is
from the Bureau of Labor Statistics websites. (3) (4)


YEAR..... CPI...... Annual Wage/Equipment..... Sep 2006 Dollars
1953......80....... 8,000...... /... ??? .......... 61000
1953......80...... 11,000....../... ??? ............ 83875

TWA
1967....100...... 6,900 / 1 yr 707 FE...... 42090
1968....104..... 14400 / 2 yr 707 FE...... 84461
1971....121..... 18000 / 4 yr 707 FE...... 90743
1971....121..... 21600 / 5 yr 707? FE.... 108892
1976....171..... 51600 / 9yr L1011 FE?... 184070

2006....610

One post on that forum indicates that F/Es made 60%, and F/Os 70% of CA wages. Extrapolating from that, and comparing to
guarantee... (AA's is only 64 hours)

. . . . . . . . . . . . TWA Historical. . . . . 2006 Dollars . . . . . . Current FDX. . . . . . . .Current AA
YEAR . . . . . . . . . . FO...... CA. . . . . . FO.......CA. . . . . . . FO........ CA. . . . . . FO........ CA
1968.... 2yr nb..... 16800... 24000..... 98538... 140769...... 93240... 155400..... 56832... 114432
1971.... 4yr nb..... 21000... 30000.... 105867... 151239...... 98568... 156288..... 70656... 115968
1976.... 9yr wb.... 60200... 86000.... 214748... 306783..... 127872... 187368..... 86784... 130560

These numbers do not assume top out - they are direct proportions based on the FE scale (i.e. 24000 in 1968 is second year Captain's pay). Assuming top of scale in 1967 was $4500/mo or $54000/yr, the equivalent would be almost $330,000 in today's dollars. Compared to FDX @ $199,800 and AA @ $152,832


In summation, FDX rates are on target with TWA's historical scales, but AA pilots, and by extention all other Majors, have about 1/2 the purchasing power of the late '60s.



(1)
http://www.smilinjack.com/cgi/ultima...;f=18;t=000208

(2) http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=001...2-3&size=LARGE

(3) http://www.lib.umich.edu/govdocs/historiccpi.html

(4) http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/surveymost

Last edited by robthree; 10-27-2006 at 05:43 AM.
Reply
Old 10-27-2006 | 03:19 AM
  #13  
JetJocF14's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: B-777 Captain
Default

Well I can tell you this I still can't go out and buy a new caddie every month. But a Flying Tiger whale captain back in the '70s could.........
Reply
Old 10-27-2006 | 03:38 AM
  #14  
JetJocF14's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: B-777 Captain
Default

Another thought ..... Back when I flew with the Great Silver Fleet my Father who worked for Shell Oil and was part of management and I would often get into discussions about unions. He was actually very pro union. His point being that it was a check and balance system.

Without a union management will ALWAYS have an excuse not to pay pilots a fair wage for the work they do. Were buying new airplanes, or were building a new hub, heck do you know much logo lights cost per airplane.

If pilots could get management to pay a million dollars for a days worth of work we would. But the company wouldn't last very long. On the other hand if management could get pilots to fly for a dollar a day the profits would go sky high but no one would stay as one needs to feed his family. Some where in the middle is a happy medimum. Which is the reason for a union.

Pilots don't run a company into the ground, management does. Which is the same reason that soldiers, sailors, and marines don't run the war..... Admirals and generals do...................

Last edited by JetJocF14; 10-27-2006 at 04:03 AM.
Reply
Old 10-27-2006 | 06:36 AM
  #15  
themotleyfool's Avatar
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: FO
Default very good point

That is a good way of describing the situation about the unions vs. management and the analogy with soldiers and generals
Reply
Old 10-27-2006 | 06:55 AM
  #16  
SkyHigh's Avatar
Self Employed.
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,120
Likes: 0
From: Corporate Pilot
Default WoW !!

Excellent Post !!

Back in the 60's and 70's there were no regional airlines. I wonder how much a career expectation is cut when you compare traditional pay rates at TWA against the regionals?

SkyHigh
Reply
Old 10-27-2006 | 06:57 AM
  #17  
SkyHigh's Avatar
Self Employed.
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,120
Likes: 0
From: Corporate Pilot
Default Good to know

I am interested to know how much a TWA pilot worked in comparison to today's pilots?

SkyHigh
Reply
Old 10-27-2006 | 07:35 AM
  #18  
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JetJocF14
Pilots don't run a company into the ground, management does. Which is the same reason that soldiers, sailors, and marines don't run the war..... Admirals and generals do...................

I agreed with everything you said in your post..........except Politicians run the war (Ruin the war) instead of listening to the Generals and Admirals. Just look at the present day Fiasco. Or the Indo China War during the 60's.
Reply
Old 10-27-2006 | 12:30 PM
  #19  
JetJocF14's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: B-777 Captain
Default

Redeye: You know what I mean
Reply
Old 10-27-2006 | 02:39 PM
  #20  
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JetJocF14
Redeye: You know what I mean
I said I agreed with you......... didn't I?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
N261ND
Military
14
10-10-2006 10:06 PM
CWU1919
Regional
110
07-27-2006 07:08 PM
WhiteH2O
Flight Schools and Training
2
06-10-2006 03:41 PM
ChrisH
Regional
70
01-01-2006 06:22 PM
loudgarrettdriver
Hiring News
2
11-06-2005 06:30 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices