I think you are worthy of the title "Maestro".

Have you contacted TO?

Honestly, TO's letter didn't say don't distribute to other web boards, I think your bias is transparent. Shameful!

I wanted to post that Fresno one, but I knew that would be an infraction. :D

I'm sure it is. I feel horrible.

They aren't going up if they aren't both posted.

Nice censorship.

Look at the quote from O'Malley's letter.

He wants equal and fair distribution, and he's got it.

The concurrence was that both get posted, but I can't do that without TT's permission.

It does more damage for him than good, as it is horribly embarrassing for the MEC chair to stoop down the way he did... I've got no problem posting it, but it was concurred that both go up.

So, TO responds to TT's letter but the only one that should be posted is TO's response?

I think if TT gives permission, then we can have TT and TO's letter. That'd be more fun.

http://theultimateplaylist.com/wp-co...er-300x300.jpg

This is a gross abuse of your power as a moderator. There is nothing in the terms of service that allow you to decide what is fair and what is not fair. You cannot make a rule up out of thin air that YOU decide is fair. If posting O'Malleys letter violates the terms of service then print out which one. This is blatant censorship because you oppose the TA. What a hypocrite.

What about the first lines of his letter?

Regardless, we conferred and if one gets posted both get posted.

In China, dogs are often used as food. This terrible practice, while alarming to you and me, is somehow tolerated, even encouraged, by some airline pilots with layovers in Shanghai.

Similarly, Clamp refusing to post TO's letter is like eating the family pet. Please put an end to both these shameful activities. Send in your card. Tell DALPA loud and clear that you want Boomer to represent you.

Thank you.