Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Major (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/)
-   -   O'Malley's rebuttal letter to C20 (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/68337-omalleys-rebuttal-letter-c20.html)

80ktsClamp 06-23-2012 02:19 PM

O'Malley's rebuttal letter to C20
 
Discuss here.

As per the other C20 letter, the content shall not be posted on this thread.

Bill Lumberg 06-23-2012 02:25 PM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1217628)
Discuss here.

As per the other C20 letter, the content shall not be posted on this thread.



Where can I find it? The rebuttal.

80ktsClamp 06-23-2012 02:26 PM

The same way you got to see Tom Tuckers letter- the ALPA forums or someone emailing it to you.

Bill Lumberg 06-23-2012 02:30 PM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1217636)
The same way you got to see Tom Tuckers letter- the ALPA forums or someone emailing it to you.

Thanks.......

More Bacon 06-23-2012 02:34 PM

So, according to DALPA, this TA is not cost neutral.

That would mean RA, EB, et al are lying by telling Wall Street that it is cost neutral.

I'm pretty sure that would be illegal. Wire fraud, conspiracy, etc. etc.

Someone needs to alert the FBI. And the SEC too, for good measure.

...or maybe it's DALPA who is lying.

alfaromeo 06-23-2012 02:39 PM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1217628)
Discuss here.

As per the other C20 letter, the content shall not be posted on this thread.

Tucker's letter was not posted because he specifically forbade public posting. That is not in the Letter from Capt. O'Malley. There have been many letters posted from union officials with no problem. You can't erase the post unless there is objection from the author. It seems to me that you are abusing your position as Moderator to erase content you don't like.

Bill Lumberg 06-23-2012 02:40 PM


Originally Posted by More Bacon (Post 1217641)
So, according to DALPA, this TA is not cost neutral.

That would mean RA, EB, et al are lying by telling Wall Street that it is cost neutral.

I'm pretty sure that would be illegal. Wire fraud, conspiracy, etc. etc.

Someone needs to alert the FBI. And the SEC too, for good measure.

...or maybe it's DALPA who is lying.

What?

Not to the pilots. The extra revenue generated by the 717s and 70 additional 76 seaters will be used to pay the raises FOR the pilots. That sounds great for us! :) ;)

Wingnutdal 06-23-2012 02:40 PM


Originally Posted by More Bacon (Post 1217641)
So, according to DALPA, this TA is not cost neutral.

That would mean RA, EB, et al are lying by telling Wall Street that it is cost neutral.

I'm pretty sure that would be illegal. Wire fraud, conspiracy, etc. etc.

Someone needs to alert the FBI. And the SEC too, for good measure.

...or maybe it's DALPA who is lying.

You are misinformed. Or lying. Which is it?

Bill Lumberg 06-23-2012 02:41 PM


Originally Posted by alfaromeo (Post 1217645)
Tucker's letter was not posted because he specifically forbade public posting. That is not in the Letter from Capt. O'Malley. There have been many letters posted from union officials with no problem. You can't erase the post unless there is objection from the author. It seems to me that you are abusing your position as Moderator to erase content you don't like.

Can you repost it? I would rather read it on here, if it is ok with 80kts.....

Wingnutdal 06-23-2012 02:44 PM

I said this in a different way before Bacon, but I really believe you are below average intelligence.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:17 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands