Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Age 67???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2012 | 06:54 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,717
Likes: 0
From: Retired
Default

Originally Posted by HercDriver130
I am going to step in here...... I am most likely one of those 'tubby" looking guys this guy is mouthing off about. Let me say this looks can be deceiving. I am a solid 6' and weigh about 265, played JH, HS and even a couple of years of college football( more like tackling dummy) and played at weights a bit more than I weigh now. I shed ALL that weight and spent 7 years in the military... a couple of those AT their max weight...then I got waivers to go heavier... flew at about 235/240 most of my time. So..anyways, I am 49, my blood pressure is a rock stable 110/65, total Cholesterol is 175, lipids etc all normal, resting heart rate around 45. I have legs like tree trunks and can still bench probably 275 and frankly I haven't lifted weights in years. I do have a medical condition that requires a SI, but my AME hopes to have that lifted this time around, simply I know longer need the medication that was required to control my condition. Overall....pretty good genetics. I "look" like my mothers side of the family.... genetically I am like my fathers side of the family. Contrast that with my Navy Pilot brother (think Richard Geer here) Tall (6'3'), thin as a rail.... retired now, as he is a few years older than me....but has fought BP problems for 15 years, cholesterol......way north of 250....and all sorts of other nagging crap.... but he LOOKS like what the poster here would love to see in the cockpit.... he looks the picture of health but it is just not so.

My point here is don't ALWAYS judge a book by its cover....you just might be wrong. America's premier long distance runner in past years, the GREAT Jim Fixx..... champion marathoner.... DEAD at barely 50 of a heart attack while out for a morning run..........

ps....oh...even now at 49 I can still do 1.5 miles in about 14 1/2 minutes.
Hey bud, don't get your panties in a wad over someone lumping all you fat-looking guys into one bucket. We all know it's not true and the author was just generalizing, however, that said, for the vast majority of fat-looking guys and gals here in our country, they are just that.....Fat. We're an obese population in general, and anyone wondering why their health costs keep going up, need only take a look around. And as for your being able to "run" a mile and a half in 14 & 1/2 minutes, that's 9 minute miles, which I believe my 5 year old granddaughter can do. Just kidding....sort of.. As well, we should recognize that people in our profession usually take better care of themselves than the population in general.

JJ
Reply
Old 07-31-2012 | 06:57 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
From: Doing what you do, for less.
Default

Reply
Old 07-31-2012 | 07:31 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,772
Likes: 1
From: 744 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Jetjok
Hey bud, don't get your panties in a wad over someone lumping all you fat-looking guys into one bucket. We all know it's not true and the author was just generalizing, however, that said, for the vast majority of fat-looking guys and gals here in our country, they are just that.....Fat. We're an obese population in general, and anyone wondering why their health costs keep going up, need only take a look around. And as for your being able to "run" a mile and a half in 14 & 1/2 minutes, that's 9 minute miles, which I believe my 5 year old granddaughter can do. Just kidding....sort of.. As well, we should recognize that people in our profession usually take better care of themselves than the population in general.

JJ
Agreed.....
Reply
Old 07-31-2012 | 07:44 AM
  #44  
block30's Avatar
Bracing for Fallacies
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,543
Likes: 0
From: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
Age 67 retirement question comes from a Dutch-German lawsuit seeking to overturn any mandatory retirement, a precursor, in my mind. Face it, mandatory retirement has been a contentious issue for decades and not just in aviation. We have 80+ doctors passing judgement on the medical fitness of pilots. I'd give it about 80% odds that there is an increase in the Age 65 rule, especially as Social Security retirement is 66, going to 67 and will be raised again.

GF
Wasn't there lots of "official" notifications of the impending age 65 change? I haven't seen anything but speculation on these forums.

Also, I agree with Grumble. Not meant to be a "swipe" at you, GF.
Reply
Old 07-31-2012 | 07:51 AM
  #45  
Timbo's Avatar
Runs with scissors
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Default

Someone (maybe on here?) mentioned that Canada and Australia had both removed any mandatory retirement age for comercial (airline) pilots. Any supporting documents on that?

I don't have time to search the inter-tubes right now, I'm going out to ride my bike, to stay in shape...and I'll probably get run over by a 87yr. old driving a caddy, or a kid texting while driving (don't get me started on that topic!), but I'll look for some official info if/when I return.

The point is, if Canada and Australia -have- removed any mandatory age, can ICAO and the FAA be far behind?
Reply
Old 07-31-2012 | 08:07 AM
  #46  
galaxy flyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,244
Likes: 2
From: Baja Vermont
Default

Enjoy the ride, Timbo, I'm doing a sim course for excitement.

Any change in the Age 65 rule in the US is now only in the rumor stage, but I suspect it is inevitable. The Age 60 rule was the hard to change and it took many lawsuits, ALPA changing stance and bankruptcies to force the change. The next change will be far easier. Remember Age 60 was an FAA imposition where no rule had existed, it was hated, too. FAA chief Quesada imposed it because he was USAF and thought pilots had no business flying after 60, not for any scientifically supported reason.

I know lots of 65+ corporate pilots that are doing fine, are sharp and want to keep going. Not sure I like it, but that is the way it is.

GF
Reply
Old 07-31-2012 | 08:20 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
From: Doing what you do, for less.
Default

Age and abilities aside, every pilot who is at the top now got there because of the mandatory retirement age of 60. They moved up because people above them retired. We work in a seniority based system. This is how it works.

Now that they're at the top, they're doing the most selfish thing imaginable and continuing to milk the top position, claiming unforeseen hardship... all done on the backs of pilots below them. They're pausing and delaying the careers of thousands during hard economic times just to pay for the lifestyle they think they should have.

People staying to 65 and hoping for 67/70 think they're in this special group that is getting it harder than anyone has and should be able to make up for it. Guess what... pilots have had unforeseen hardships for decades. That isn't something new about this career. You aren't special. You're selfish. Retire while you still have enough years left in you to get on with your life, and collectively... get out of our seats.
Reply
Old 07-31-2012 | 08:44 AM
  #48  
texaspilot76's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 0
From: Right Seat
Default

Originally Posted by lolwut
Age and abilities aside, every pilot who is at the top now got there because of the mandatory retirement age of 60. They moved up because people above them retired. We work in a seniority based system. This is how it works.

Now that they're at the top, they're doing the most selfish thing imaginable and continuing to milk the top position, claiming unforeseen hardship... all done on the backs of pilots below them. They're pausing and delaying the careers of thousands during hard economic times just to pay for the lifestyle they think they should have.

People staying to 65 and hoping for 67/70 think they're in this special group that is getting it harder than anyone has and should be able to make up for it. Guess what... pilots have had unforeseen hardships for decades. That isn't something new about this career. You aren't special. You're selfish. Retire while you still have enough years left in you to get on with your life, and collectively... get out of our seats.
Couldn't have said it better myself.
Reply
Old 07-31-2012 | 09:09 AM
  #49  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by lolwut
Age and abilities aside, every pilot who is at the top now got there because of the mandatory retirement age of 60. They moved up because people above them retired. We work in a seniority based system. This is how it works.

Now that they're at the top, they're doing the most selfish thing imaginable and continuing to milk the top position, claiming unforeseen hardship... all done on the backs of pilots below them. They're pausing and delaying the careers of thousands during hard economic times just to pay for the lifestyle they think they should have.

People staying to 65 and hoping for 67/70 think they're in this special group that is getting it harder than anyone has and should be able to make up for it. Guess what... pilots have had unforeseen hardships for decades. That isn't something new about this career. You aren't special. You're selfish. Retire while you still have enough years left in you to get on with your life, and collectively... get out of our seats.
Seniority is everything and they have it and want to keep it. Makes perfect sense. I'm sure five more years at the top would be like winning the lottery.
Reply
Old 07-31-2012 | 09:21 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
From: Doing what you do, for less.
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Seniority is everything and they have it and want to keep it. Makes perfect sense. I'm sure five more years at the top would be like winning the lottery.
Yep and they got there because people above them retired at the age of 60 and moved on with their lives. They didn't cry about it and get the retirement age changed.


Can you imagine what it'd be like without a retirement age? It'd be like being an FA. The stories they tell, and their senior ranks, are horrendous.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BIGBROWNDC8
Cargo
7
10-22-2007 03:33 PM
duvie
Major
0
01-30-2007 12:20 PM
Andy
Major
25
11-20-2006 07:13 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices