Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Virgin America a hit, but losing money >

Virgin America a hit, but losing money

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Virgin America a hit, but losing money

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-29-2012, 06:05 AM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CanoePilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,166
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206 View Post
Ok, VX isnt trying to run anyone out of business and they do have a nice onboard product. So why arent they making any money?

And dont try to argue that UAL is beating up VX so badly that they cant survive. Look at NK and their success, despite all the legacy competition.
The business model is flawed. The way they are running the airline is horrible. Everything is don east to west and all flight hub out of SFO or LAX.

There is so much wrong with the route structure.
CanoePilot is offline  
Old 09-29-2012, 08:13 AM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 712
Default

Originally Posted by CanoePilot View Post
The business model is flawed. The way they are running the airline is horrible. Everything is don east to west and all flight hub out of SFO or LAX.

There is so much wrong with the route structure.
They seem to go into saturated markets like L.A. or New York where everyone and their brother already operate with little net profits. I wish them luck but it doesn't look good from a financial standpoint.
Herkulesdrvr is offline  
Old 09-29-2012, 08:55 AM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,569
Default

And Continental's contract has been a bankruptcy worthy drag on others for the last 25+ years. Every contract cycle I have been through at NWA now Delta they point to cal pay and workrules(or lack there of)


Originally Posted by Bluesky1 View Post
People Express is now United Continental. PE Flight Ops Management is running the place (Fred Abbott). Do some research. No dog in the hunt, just felt compelled.
NERD is offline  
Old 09-29-2012, 04:50 PM
  #84  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 66
Default

Originally Posted by NERD View Post
And Continental's contract has been a bankruptcy worthy drag on others for the last 25+ years. Every contract cycle I have been through at NWA now Delta they point to cal pay and workrules(or lack there of)
Totally agree.
Bluesky1 is offline  
Old 09-29-2012, 11:42 PM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,902
Default

Originally Posted by Flyby1206 View Post
Ok, VX isnt trying to run anyone out of business and they do have a nice onboard product. So why arent they making any money?

And dont try to argue that UAL is beating up VX so badly that they cant survive. Look at NK and their success, despite all the legacy competition.
NK is an entirely different business model with 178 seats in a A320 and 145 in an A319. Lot more seats than their competition on the same plane allows them to sell more seats at a very low ticket price, filling up almost every seat. Plus, I'm sure you're aware of their industry leading onboard and bag charges. 33% of NK revenue is from ancillary fees.

UA has beefed up the competition more this year than any years prior with VA. Also not helping is the fuel cost. Flying a significant amount of transcontinental flying means less room to recover from high gas prices that you could from shorter hops.

VA has continuously expanded year over year with lots of aircraft and markets. Now, for the first time, VA sill slow its growth. They get just 1 airplane in the next 12 months, and are focusing on getting the most out of our destinations and letting markets mature. The upcoming quarters should be better year over year.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 10-03-2012, 07:19 AM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Skeptical
Posts: 378
Default

https://centreforaviation.com/analys...tability-84013
Golden Bear is offline  
Old 10-03-2012, 08:37 AM
  #87  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,857
Default

And reality sinks in....
Sailor is offline  
Old 10-03-2012, 11:45 AM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,902
Default

Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
And reality sinks in....
The slow/stopped growth was planned ahead of time. The new aircraft order won't start until Fall 2013. One more aircraft comes in March 2013. What they initially planned to do was stop growth for one year so they could announce profits, and then go public IPO. So far they haven't announced a profitable quarter this year, so that IPO timeline will have to be re-set. I don't see why there's a rush to get a IPO launched. Spirit didn't do one until just a couple years ago, and that was after they had been well established for over two decades. Branson is a patient investor, and it seems the American investors are also committed long term, so I don't think the IPO needs to happen within the next year.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 10-03-2012, 12:25 PM
  #89  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post
The slow/stopped growth was planned ahead of time. The new aircraft order won't start until Fall 2013. One more aircraft comes in March 2013. What they initially planned to do was stop growth for one year so they could announce profits, and then go public IPO. So far they haven't announced a profitable quarter this year, so that IPO timeline will have to be re-set. I don't see why there's a rush to get a IPO launched. Spirit didn't do one until just a couple years ago, and that was after they had been well established for over two decades. Branson is a patient investor, and it seems the American investors are also committed long term, so I don't think the IPO needs to happen within the next year.
Burning through cash while losses continue to widen may have something to do with it.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 10-03-2012, 12:32 PM
  #90  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 33
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29 View Post
Burning through cash while losses continue to widen may have something to do with it.
Says the guy whose company lost a net of 8.4 Billion since 2008.

(Don't get me worng... I think Delta is a strong company, but this is aviation... and Delta did post a huge 2Q loss this year and is at a net loss so far -- yeah, bought a refinery, and while at best guess that's gonna pan out, it's a gamble, just like the rest of this biz).
FlyFishPilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NEDude
Major
10
01-17-2011 11:18 AM
deltabound
Major
110
02-05-2009 10:59 AM
greedyairlineexec
Major
13
01-02-2008 08:15 AM
Freight Dog
Major
0
07-16-2005 03:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices