Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Virgin America a hit, but losing money >

Virgin America a hit, but losing money

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Virgin America a hit, but losing money

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-26-2012, 07:03 AM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TeddyKGB's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: 7er
Posts: 1,673
Default

Originally Posted by Sailor View Post
You are right!!. A lot of talk. See ya on the next qtrly report!!
I wouldn't waste your time with shyguy. He was one of the biggest tools to ever wear a 9E uniform.

Last edited by TeddyKGB; 09-26-2012 at 07:41 AM.
TeddyKGB is offline  
Old 09-26-2012, 07:32 AM
  #72  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,857
Default

Originally Posted by Delta1067 View Post
I wouldn't waste your time with shyguy. He was one of the biggest tools to over wear a 9E uniform.

Thanks DL1067, ...-and there is always one of those-..
Sailor is offline  
Old 09-26-2012, 07:39 AM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 138
Default

Originally Posted by globalexpress View Post
It really wasn't a financial analysis. I just looked at the press releases that Virgin put out and used subtraction. Then I looked at the net loss posted and compared it to their revenue and noted a significant loss.

What did I miss?
My apologies -- your response wasn't bad, and I posted quickly and sarcastically -- I should have taken more time and re-read your response. Here is what I was getting at, you are reading an unaudited report from a company that is not required to report and that is nearly 90 days old. That cash situation that existed then is irrelevant now. The net loss is cryptic and not explained by the numbers, nor narrative.
squaretail is offline  
Old 09-26-2012, 11:57 AM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CanoePilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,166
Default

Virgin America widens 2Q net loss to $31.8 million | ATWOnline

Virgin America (VX) reported a second-quarter net loss of $31.8 million, widened from a $21.7 million loss in the year-ago period.
CanoePilot is offline  
Old 09-26-2012, 12:02 PM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
jacjetlag's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Position: 787 Capt.
Posts: 125
Default

No offense to people working there....

VA is the People Express of today.
jacjetlag is offline  
Old 09-26-2012, 12:25 PM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,902
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
Branson's stated goal was to run United and / or Delta out of the Pacific where they compete with Virgin Blue. He made other statements directowards running United (pre merger) out of business.
Branson has never stated he wants to run United or any other legacy out of business. United, even pre-merger, was and is a very strong legacy carrier, with a huge international network, diverse fleet. VA cannot run ANYONE out of business, simply based on the size and destinations alone. All VA is set up for is to provide an alternate to the bland flying options available in the US, offering a higher class product. You cannot put a legacy airline out of business like United by starting a domestic A320-only airline that does mostly transcons. From day 1, United has been giving VX the headaches, not the other way around.

Last edited by ShyGuy; 09-26-2012 at 12:40 PM.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 09-26-2012, 12:38 PM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,902
Default

Originally Posted by Delta1067 View Post
I wouldn't waste your time with shyguy. He was one of the biggest tools to ever wear a 9E uniform.
Comical. Coming from a guy who's never flown with me.

Nice knowing you, Mr. Sept-2010-DOH-at-Delta-thank-god-a-mesaba-flowthrough-because-otherwise-a-tool-like-you-would-never-have-gotten-hired-off-the-street.

I heard your reputation at Mesaba wasn't exactly stellar.

Good day.




Originally Posted by Sailor
Thanks DL1067, ...-and there is always one of those-..
You're gonna take his word, someone who has never flown at 9E or VX? He's an arrogant tool who has a serious complex now that he's at mainline Delta, as of 9/2010.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 09-27-2012, 10:44 AM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 474
Default

Originally Posted by squaretail View Post
My apologies -- your response wasn't bad, and I posted quickly and sarcastically -- I should have taken more time and re-read your response. Here is what I was getting at, you are reading an unaudited report from a company that is not required to report and that is nearly 90 days old. That cash situation that existed then is irrelevant now. The net loss is cryptic and not explained by the numbers, nor narrative.
Well, actually, they are required to report certain information to the DOT, including some financial information. A few years ago, they tried (unsuccessfully) to get around that requirement, citing that they were a private company. So now we all have press releases to read with some information instead of an actual 10Q.

If you're arguing that Virgin is putting out press releases that are deliberately incorrect or are misleading because they are "unaudited" (whatever that means) and they are "not required to report" (they are) then I hope no one from the DOT is reading your posts and that's speculation on your part.

It's true that Virgin tends to put out their quarterly information much later than the other airlines and the data is old. However, the June 30th "snapshot" provided by their press release is pretty straightforward. In 6 months, they have burned through about half of their unrestricted cash as reported on their 2011 annual report and their latest quarterly filing. They also have a significant net loss for both the quarter and the first 6 months of their calendar year.

Obviously the day after the press release is submitted things change, but if you're implying that a 100M net loss for the 1st 6 months of the year is going to be reversed in the last 6 months of this calendar year .......well .......sure- anything's possible.
globalexpress is offline  
Old 09-28-2012, 06:21 PM
  #79  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 66
Default

Originally Posted by jacjetlag View Post
No offense to people working there....

VA is the People Express of today.
People Express is now United Continental. PE Flight Ops Management is running the place (Fred Abbott). Do some research. No dog in the hunt, just felt compelled.
Bluesky1 is offline  
Old 09-29-2012, 03:55 AM
  #80  
SDQ Base Chief
 
Flyby1206's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 320 CA
Posts: 5,619
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post
Branson has never stated he wants to run United or any other legacy out of business. United, even pre-merger, was and is a very strong legacy carrier, with a huge international network, diverse fleet. VA cannot run ANYONE out of business, simply based on the size and destinations alone. All VA is set up for is to provide an alternate to the bland flying options available in the US, offering a higher class product. You cannot put a legacy airline out of business like United by starting a domestic A320-only airline that does mostly transcons. From day 1, United has been giving VX the headaches, not the other way around.
Ok, VX isnt trying to run anyone out of business and they do have a nice onboard product. So why arent they making any money?

And dont try to argue that UAL is beating up VX so badly that they cant survive. Look at NK and their success, despite all the legacy competition.
Flyby1206 is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NEDude
Major
10
01-17-2011 11:18 AM
deltabound
Major
110
02-05-2009 10:59 AM
greedyairlineexec
Major
13
01-02-2008 08:15 AM
Freight Dog
Major
0
07-16-2005 03:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices