U.S. Senate Vs Electronic Devices
#21
During an RTO, a newspaper, magazine or book hurts a lot less when hitting the back of my head than an iPad or phone.
Nothing to do with electronics, just purely safety related to hard projectiles traveling at high speed. Good luck holding onto your stuff, especially in the event of egress from the runway.
Nothing to do with electronics, just purely safety related to hard projectiles traveling at high speed. Good luck holding onto your stuff, especially in the event of egress from the runway.
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 0
It's not about your phone. It's about 147 phones.
Electronic devices in general are put away to keep the aisle clear and prevent FA's from having to check if something is in "Airplane Mode" (Just having them completely off is easier to manage and administer) while the A/C is in a critical phase of flight. There are both FAA and FCC prohibitions on cell phones because they OBVIOUSLY DO interfere with radio communications, including radio-based navaids. The FCC prohibition is more related to overloaded networks. Talk to an engineer. Or set your phone next to a radio.
20 minutes with all your crap put away isn't much to ask.
Electronic devices in general are put away to keep the aisle clear and prevent FA's from having to check if something is in "Airplane Mode" (Just having them completely off is easier to manage and administer) while the A/C is in a critical phase of flight. There are both FAA and FCC prohibitions on cell phones because they OBVIOUSLY DO interfere with radio communications, including radio-based navaids. The FCC prohibition is more related to overloaded networks. Talk to an engineer. Or set your phone next to a radio.
20 minutes with all your crap put away isn't much to ask.
#23
Ridiculous circular logic. As if allowing them to have them all on makes it better?
You know it when you go missed and make a semi-ominous PA letting them you may have to divert to a VFR field if they don't turn of their phone. Been there.
Bigger fish to fry like what? The FA's are all back there trying to get to their jumpseats before the gear comes down.
It's simple, put all your stuff away. Your very example will delay in securing the cabin. An extra couple seconds per row determining if you're gonna "let it slide." The pack mentality dictates that looking the other way will only lead to further abuses/haggling by pax.
You know it when you go missed and make a semi-ominous PA letting them you may have to divert to a VFR field if they don't turn of their phone. Been there.
It's simple, put all your stuff away. Your very example will delay in securing the cabin. An extra couple seconds per row determining if you're gonna "let it slide." The pack mentality dictates that looking the other way will only lead to further abuses/haggling by pax.
#24
I remember as a kid listening to my cassette player from gate to gate with no issues in the 80s. But once the gameboy came out electronic devices became limited on when they could be used. Always seemed more of a "distraction issue" just in case.
The whole issue is people are so "plugged in" to their devices that they feel they have the right to be on them, regardless what anyone tells them. Even if there was case studies saying cell phones or kindles left on could mess with navigation equipment or possibly start a spark in the fuel tanks, people would still want to test the systems.
Still what was the difference between a 727, 747, or any other commercial ac flown around the world before the "electronic" ban. Nothing, same equipment, just the FAA made it a rule that things must be turned off.
The whole issue is people are so "plugged in" to their devices that they feel they have the right to be on them, regardless what anyone tells them. Even if there was case studies saying cell phones or kindles left on could mess with navigation equipment or possibly start a spark in the fuel tanks, people would still want to test the systems.
Still what was the difference between a 727, 747, or any other commercial ac flown around the world before the "electronic" ban. Nothing, same equipment, just the FAA made it a rule that things must be turned off.
#25
Usually it is just a nuisance with noise in the headsets. However, a passenger with a cell phone who is seated near the ILS receivers, radio antenna, or near the magnetic compass sensors can cause a real problem -- especially if the device is malfunctioning and not operating on the proper frequencies.
Unlikely? Yes. If they want to change the law, I suggest they allow the use of these devices only during VFR conditions. Under IFR, I suggest people power down.
#26
People should be able to have iPads, kindles, etc. on. They do not interfere at all. Cell phones should remain off but lets be real here. How many people actually power their devices all the way down? The vast majority use airplane mode and the FA never knows. In all the times I have non reved I have never seen anyone turn an iPad, iPod, or iPhone all the way off.
People always put them in airplane mode, hide it from the FA, and half the time people bring them back out and listen to their music/read their book when she isn't looking. Keep the cell phone, radio, tv, etc ban. It is time to join the 21st century and allow the other stuff. I have even seen businessmen close their laptop, wait til the FA is seated and get right back on it. No one has fallen out of the sky yet.
People always put them in airplane mode, hide it from the FA, and half the time people bring them back out and listen to their music/read their book when she isn't looking. Keep the cell phone, radio, tv, etc ban. It is time to join the 21st century and allow the other stuff. I have even seen businessmen close their laptop, wait til the FA is seated and get right back on it. No one has fallen out of the sky yet.
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 169
From: window seat
During an RTO, a newspaper, magazine or book hurts a lot less when hitting the back of my head than an iPad or phone.
Nothing to do with electronics, just purely safety related to hard projectiles traveling at high speed. Good luck holding onto your stuff, especially in the event of egress from the runway.
Nothing to do with electronics, just purely safety related to hard projectiles traveling at high speed. Good luck holding onto your stuff, especially in the event of egress from the runway.
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
But nothing in the current rules says you can't continue to hold a phone or eReader. And plenty of people still do. Along with many other head shattering hard objects. I'd be more concerned about someone using knitting needles or drinking hot coffee in an RTO than I would about someone holding an iPod.
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 169
From: window seat
OK my bad. So we're back to the venti extra hot latte in one hand and the new hard cover crime thriller in the other. That's WAY safer. Or knitting with long sharp needles. But those iPhone missiles during an RTO, boy is that dangerous LOL!
#30
On Reserve
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 180
Likes: 25
From what I've gathered, flight attendants do their final sweep to make sure everything is gathered, all personal bags stowed and electronics off all for the sake of a cabin that doesn't have things left loose to either fly around or impede an exit for somebody. The previously mentioned "but infants don't need to be stowed" by someone leaves me to conclude with another point to think about. One of the flight attendants in the Sioux City crash has been an advocate for requiring all children to have a purchased seat because of those who were killed that were not restrained in a seat during the crash.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wannabepilot
Hangar Talk
0
04-25-2008 09:19 PM



