![]() |
Originally Posted by Velocipede
(Post 92858)
What will be the next stop in "finishing the war"? Syria? They harbor terrorists. Yemen? Yep, they do to. Turkey? Gotta help those Kurds. Kazakstan? They're notorious Armenian persecuters.
Man, we need a bigger military. Oh, that's right, Republicans don't want any taxes to pay for that or any other government program. Something of a quandry...Hmm...How about if we declare victory, bring the boys home and let the ragheads smoke each other? Of course, that might have negative consequences for Halliburton's business enterprises in Iraq. CEO Dick Cheney won't like that. Or is he VPUS? Which pays more? Army is extending tours from by 3 months, and the Marines are now going to do 9 month combat tours in Iraq. If the US is unable to contain / mitigate the violence in Iraq you may have Saudi Arabia and other Arab states flooding the country with arms / money in order to defeat the Iranian elemetns / influence. Increasing troops in my opinion is a bad idea. It will make the Iraq less able / willing to stand up and provide for its own security. We may be creating a dependency in the Middle-East and that will be a total disaster. -LAFF |
Originally Posted by CE750
(Post 92951)
A UNION is a necessary evil in our business; erase all that BS you learned about the free market, and Walmart, and accept it as a reality of your "profession"
1. The American public doesn't want to pay for anything (that's why WalMart is so big). 2. Some people will suffer any indignity to get a job. They'll work for substandard wages and benefits (the OTHER reason why WalMart is so big). Greedy managers will prey on the ignorance of those who will debase themselves. Curious how the common thread is the Rah! Rah! attitude demonstrated by the Kool-Aid drinkers employed by those companies, be it B6, VX or WalMart. They work for substandard wage/benefit packages while the Walton family consistently heads the list of the world's richest individuals. So, who is the sucker in this picture? |
Name-calling
Originally Posted by Velocipede
(Post 92981)
When someone doesn't have an argument, they generally resort to namecalling. That's why Rush Limbaugh is so popular with his particular "audience".
|
Originally Posted by Velocipede
(Post 89510)
Tell you what, vegasd0uche. You're choosing to work for a non-Union company that is undercutting my Union contract. By definition, you're choosing to be a cancer on the industry.
Don't ask for a jumpseat.
Originally Posted by Velocipede
(Post 92981)
When someone doesn't have an argument, they generally resort to namecalling. That's why Rush Limbaugh is so popular with his particular "audience".
|
Originally Posted by SharkyBN584
(Post 92998)
I'm just amazed that you enjoy the fact you can f*ck up someone's commute home a lil' too much.
|
Originally Posted by wild4theuniform
(Post 92990)
I've read your posts and in 99% of them you refer to fellow pilots as "scabs, sc*m, and sc*mbags." Now that's rich!! So, now I guess you'll call me a name, too.
|
Originally Posted by LAfrequentflyer
(Post 92983)
Increasing troops in my opinion is a bad idea. It will make the Iraq less able / willing to stand up and provide for its own security. We may be creating a dependency in the Middle-East and that will be a total disaster.
-LAFF Reducing troops is a bad idea AND: the status quo isn't working How can increasing the number of troops be a bad idea? |
Get it?
Originally Posted by Velocipede
(Post 93009)
Honey, those aren't names, they're descriptions. Curious how uncomfortable B6 jokers get when you hold the mirror up to their actions, isn't it?
|
Originally Posted by 1Seat 1Engine
(Post 93010)
IF:
Reducing troops is a bad idea AND: the status quo isn't working How can increasing the number of troops be a bad idea? Why are the old Baathists not being welcomed back into the military / security services? -LAFF |
Originally Posted by wild4theuniform
(Post 93013)
You get the point now??!! :rolleyes
Of course my other agenda is to get every Union Captain on board with the "deny B6 jumpseats" program. Would you give a child molester a ride to your daughter's elementary school? Of course not. Then why would you give someone actively undercutting your contract making your quality of life suffer a ride to work so he can continue whacking you? |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:55 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands