American fires back at pilots
#11
I would suggest by your post that you've had very little experience in airline contract negotiations.
IMO, the APA is correct in not signing a side letter and giving away some of their leverage in seeking a new agreement. That would be foolish.
Don't for one second think that the APA wouldn't want an agreement to fly this route non-stop both ways. But they are correct in keeping their eye on the bigger prize - a complete contract.
If the company really wants the route, then they have to get serious at the bargaining table. Apparently they are not.
What are people so quick to blame the unions?
IMO, the APA is correct in not signing a side letter and giving away some of their leverage in seeking a new agreement. That would be foolish.
Don't for one second think that the APA wouldn't want an agreement to fly this route non-stop both ways. But they are correct in keeping their eye on the bigger prize - a complete contract.
If the company really wants the route, then they have to get serious at the bargaining table. Apparently they are not.
What are people so quick to blame the unions?
#12
When the 108 congressman and 15 mayors want to fly to China, put them on a nonstop that stops in Chicago adding 4 hours to there trip and see if they plan on recommending it to the traveling public.
#13
Here are the facts. Whether you believe them or not is up to you.
APA was mainly after sequence protection for super long haul (12+ hours.)
As someone above said, don't think for a minute that APA would turn down extra flying - the key word being "extra." DFW-PEK was NOT extra flying - they would just pull a 777 from some other market and replace it with this one. We are not accepting new aircraft like CO and DL. But we are not about to grant contract relief for free while not making sure we're covered for the contingencies. Why can't other unions do the same?
APA was mainly after sequence protection for super long haul (12+ hours.)
As someone above said, don't think for a minute that APA would turn down extra flying - the key word being "extra." DFW-PEK was NOT extra flying - they would just pull a 777 from some other market and replace it with this one. We are not accepting new aircraft like CO and DL. But we are not about to grant contract relief for free while not making sure we're covered for the contingencies. Why can't other unions do the same?
But, your statement "We are not accepting new aircraft like CO and DL" is a little mis-leading. First, AA has almost 700 mainline jets, while DL and CO are approximately 400. AA has a higher market share in most int'l markets, too. And, AA has 54 B-777s to fly any new Asia routes. CO only has 18 777s and DL only 8. Nowhere NEAR the long-haul WB lift AA has for additional Asia flights. And, AA is getting rid of 16 fairly new P&W/ETOPS (ex-TWA) B-757s, which DL has leased from ILFC, for additional ATL/CVG/JFK-Europe flying. As any layman could observe, any mainline jets leaving AA are NOT going to be replaced anytime soon, and why in the world AA would allow competitors to lease these low-time jets is beyond me.
And lastly, I'm sure AA management does not consider those extra items you mentioned APA wanted attached to the China route award 'no-cost'. EVERYthing is 'cost' to AA.
#14
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,890
Yeah... revised boarding priority for pilots and the possibility to use F/A jumpseats if they're empty. Wow, what a cost! It'll bankrupt the Co for sure. The only "cost" item was free internet use for the PEK crews.
#16
Regarding ex-TWA 757s going from AA to DL: I know 11 are going to DL for sure, as reported by SpeedNews, but all 16 could be eventually.
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,890
'Cost' doesn't necessarily mean money to your managers; it could be that tangible things are worth something to them, and they just won't negotiate regarding them. That F/A j/s thing sounds like a can of worms, but I don't see why a pilot can't use it when empty. Typical response, that's all I can say.
The TWA birds were fine machines and relatively new, but we've known since '03 that the Co would try and get rid of them (high leases.) After these, it's looking like AA is done shrinking.
73
#18
Small nitpick here...AA has 45 777's, not 54.
#19
Actually my JP Airline Fleets '06 (And SpeedNews, www.airfleets.com) says they have 47, with 7 on order, so I mistakenly included the (7) future orders as already delivered (54). STILL a glaring difference bwtween AA and CO/DL, wouldn't you say?
#20
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post