Delta MEC Maneuvering, aka coup
#31
Again, you have to focus on individual actions. Not directing this at you, but let's say DPA gets voted in. Will guys magically start attending meetings? We can't outsource our opinion, then complain when things don't turn out to our liking.
I predict that we will be back to the very same spot, with guys complaining about an "entrenched establishment" within a few years MINUS all the good stuff that ALPA does for us, as Bar alludes to.
88, how do you propose we avoid ending up in the same exact spot? What's to say that we don't end up with mostly the same faces running the show, albeit with less national/international influence and support?
As I hear you, you feel there are really 2 arguments that you're combining into one:
1. We don't need to waste our resources supporting, or be hindered (my take on how you feel about it) by a national organization that the DPA asserts is unnecessary
2. The individuals and/or the structure is corrupt and self-serving.
For #1 I disagree. I see ALPA national as an essential tool for defending/advancing our careers.
For #2 I think you're going to have the same complaints no matter who is running the show, or how it is structured. Pilots, in general want to complain, but rarely pick up the shovel. Those that do pick up the shovel are labelled "establishment" or "old guard." I don't see that changing if DPA were to somehow take over.
I predict that we will be back to the very same spot, with guys complaining about an "entrenched establishment" within a few years MINUS all the good stuff that ALPA does for us, as Bar alludes to.
88, how do you propose we avoid ending up in the same exact spot? What's to say that we don't end up with mostly the same faces running the show, albeit with less national/international influence and support?
As I hear you, you feel there are really 2 arguments that you're combining into one:
1. We don't need to waste our resources supporting, or be hindered (my take on how you feel about it) by a national organization that the DPA asserts is unnecessary
2. The individuals and/or the structure is corrupt and self-serving.
For #1 I disagree. I see ALPA national as an essential tool for defending/advancing our careers.
For #2 I think you're going to have the same complaints no matter who is running the show, or how it is structured. Pilots, in general want to complain, but rarely pick up the shovel. Those that do pick up the shovel are labelled "establishment" or "old guard." I don't see that changing if DPA were to somehow take over.
It seems to me that, whenever there is something really big, we get a much larger turnout for the vote. I guess that's human nature. But imagine if we had a compelling objective. An objective that would put our profession and our careers back on track with what most of us expected when we worked so hard to achieve this in the first place. I think THAT would overcome apathy better than anything else. I think THAT would result in a more unified pilot group than we've ever seen.
We took absolutely devastating, unprecedented cuts. I think most in this pilot group expected that, after the bankruptcy storm was over, we would recover most if not all of what was lost. When Delta came out of bankruptcy and DALPA acted like everything was hunky dory and that we had no intention of restoration... I think THAT is when apathy got taken to a whole new level.
I think DALPA has clearly demonstrated they are NOT capable of changing to the degree it would take. They have clearly demonstrated that they are committed to the idea of just doing the best they think we can from the new baseline established by bankruptcy. They've done a masterful job at establishing their political power base and making sure that anyone who has a different philosophy is either successfully discouraged or is rooted out. It's not going to get "fixed."
With a new start and a more appropriate objective, I think the apathy problem can be made better. Not cured, but better. The "old guard" won't have their claws into it or the opportunity to get their claws into it because more of us will be paying attention. At least I hope it would work that way. It's either give up or try. I choose try.
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
From: DAL FO
My point in the last few posts though, is if you want it, attend a meeting and submit the resolution. Or have a buddy submit it if you can't make the meeting. Hell, I'd even walk that one in for you if you could come up with a good solution of how to solve this problem. Guys are obviously bothered by this, so it's worth exploring.
I'm interested to hear any ideas you have that might mix MEMRAT with an MEC vote/confirmation or something like that.
The only reason we can't have what you're asking for is we haven't asked the right way. If you really want it, let's get some resolutions coming in from various councils asking for it. To date, I'm not aware that any base has proposed such a system.
#33
Can't abide NAI
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
#34
Well actually, that wasn't my point. I think we benefit and "Old Guard" needs to stay ... they just somehow need to put ALPA first. They need to learn what unity is.
IMHO the "old guard" is a real dichotomy. They are effective, the do good work and at the same time; they are exclusionary and divisive.
I'm a results guy. Based on results, the "old guard" delivers. They would be more effective if they would flex up and be inclusive. They could achieve the same goals more cleanly without the dead bodies (those they have angered and alienated).
IMHO the "old guard" is a real dichotomy. They are effective, the do good work and at the same time; they are exclusionary and divisive.
I'm a results guy. Based on results, the "old guard" delivers. They would be more effective if they would flex up and be inclusive. They could achieve the same goals more cleanly without the dead bodies (those they have angered and alienated).
#35
Well actually, that wasn't my point.
I think we benefit and "Old Guard" needs to stay ... they just somehow need to put ALPA first. They need to learn what unity is.
IMHO the "old guard" is a real dichotomy. They are effective, the do good work and at the same time; they are exclusionary and divisive.
I think we benefit and "Old Guard" needs to stay ... they just somehow need to put ALPA first. They need to learn what unity is.
IMHO the "old guard" is a real dichotomy. They are effective, the do good work and at the same time; they are exclusionary and divisive.
#36
This becomes a little interesting. You advocate term limits. (I am not opposed to that, but I think it not a panacea for all the ills either) would Mr Ryan have fallen under those term limits? <---(rhetorical question) And then you have the classic old: what if the guy in office is producing well, and now he has to leave, and Johnny Bumpkin is the only guy that wants the job? Not everybody wants to do those jobs; I know I certainly don't, primarily because they are thankless, but I would rather fly airplanes. I don't want guys like Tim Caplinger running the show either, but he seems to want the job...
#38
Can't abide NAI
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
That is the decision I am concerned about.
#39
Can't abide NAI
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
#40
Delivers what?! Our pay rates are currently at a level of buying power 32%+ BELOW where we were when we took a 32.5% pay cut an an emergency measure to supposedly prevent Delta from having to declare bankruptcy. And almost 10 years later, that pay cut essentially stands today! ZERO progress. And DALPA has indicated no intention of doing a whole lot better than that.
Delivers what? Delivers less than mediocrity.
Delivers what? Delivers less than mediocrity.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





