Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Battle For Seattle: AS/DL Frenemies in 2014? >

Battle For Seattle: AS/DL Frenemies in 2014?


Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Battle For Seattle: AS/DL Frenemies in 2014?

Old 12-08-2013, 08:42 PM
  #51  
Respek
 
Cruz5350's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,619
Default

The absolute worst thing that can happen is Delta buying Alaska..... That nice little tidbit in the new AS TA that has zero scope restrictions will make it's way into whatever new agreement they see fit. Kiss domestic mainline flying goodbye as it'll all be done by regionals using ERJ MRJ and C series whatever's.... Delta mainline will only exist to fly international, the rest of carriers will follow suit. Sound absolutely crazy ridiculous... That's why it might could just happen years from now that is.
Cruz5350 is online now  
Old 12-08-2013, 10:25 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Caution Terrain's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Position: PLEASE ADVISE
Posts: 339
Default Battle For Seattle: AS/DL Frenemies in 2014?

Well the worst thing that could happen, happens everyday. Making junior pilots suck their tiny pay checks out of a mgmt hose while mainline guys reminisce of when they had to suck from that same hose, but say, oh hey you're not planning on using that ladder are ya!? Yoink let me pull that on up here.
Maybe I'm way off.
Back to thread.
Caution Terrain is offline  
Old 12-09-2013, 03:04 AM
  #53  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 9
Default At the end of Round 1:

Delta Draws Blood in Seattle as Analyst Cuts Alaska's Rating
BY Ted Reed| 12/09/13 - 06:45 AM EST
Stock quotes in this article: ALK, DAL

inShare
Comment0
Find out if (ALK) is in Cramer's Portfolio.
SEATTLE(TheStreet) -- As the David and Goliath battle between Alaska Airlines (ALK_) and Delta (DAL_) for dominance at Seattle Tacoma International Airport continues to ratchet up, Delta seems to have drawn first blood as a leading airline analyst downgraded Alaska because of the conflict.

In a note issued Friday, Deutsche Bank analyst Mike Linenberg downgraded Alaska to sell from hold, noting that Alaska is planning to boost service at Delta's hub in Salt Lake City.

"We view these measures as retaliatory on the part of Alaska in response to Delta's significant growth in its Seattle backyard," Linenberg wrote. "Furthermore, the recent moves by both 'partners' suggest that their long-standing code share and marketing agreements could be unraveling.

"While these actions are negative for both airlines, the fact that Delta is roughly eight times the size of Alaska (i.e. $38 billion of revenue estimated for 2013 vs. Alaska's $5 billion) leads us to believe that Alaska will be disproportionately impacted," he said.



Alaska shares closed Friday at $75.85, down $1.10 on an up day for the market. Shares have risen 71% year-to-date. Linenberg said his 12-month price target is $70. His 2014 per share estimate for the carrier is $5.25, well below the consensus estimate of $6.35.

"We are hopeful that both airlines can resolve their various issues so as to maintain their long-standing partnership," Linenberg said. "We are of the view that that would be a far better outcome than what is in store for next year."

Last week included two Seattle-related announcements by Delta. First, the world's second-biggest airline said it will begin non-stop Seattle-Fairbanks service in May and non-stop Vancouver, Canada, service in June. Also, at historic Boeing Field in Seattle, Delta unveiled a Boeing 737-900 that it named "Spirit of Seattle." Alaska responded on Twitter with a photo of one of its aircraft and this text: "The original 'Spirit of Seattle' a nod to the beautiful city we call home."

On Friday, Alaska seemed to tire of turning the other cheek. It announced it would boost Salt Lake flying in June. New destinations from Salt Lake will include Portland, Ore.; Los Angeles; San Diego; and San Jose. Additionally, Alaska will add a third daily Salt Lake-Seattle flight.

"Salt Lake City has long been a top requested market by our customers and we are pleased to add to our successful Seattle-Salt Lake City flights with additional service from four other West Coast gateways," said Joe Sprague, Alaska vice president of marketing, in a prepared statement.

"This new service connects travelers with Alaska's strong network on the West Coast," he said. "In addition, our customers will enjoy double miles that apply toward elite status in our award-winning Mileage Plan program."

Aviation consultant Bob Mann said the "tit for tat" Alaska/Delta battle may signal an end to the trend toward capacity discipline that the airline industry had demonstrated over the past two years. He noted that Delta is also growing in Boston. The carrier said last month it would add five non-stop destinations from Boston next year.

"With Delta growing in Seattle and Boston, and now Alaska's response in Salt Lake, plus the DCA and LGA slot redistribution to growth-happy carriers (and inevitable competitive responses), when is someone going to write that capacity discipline is officially out the window?" Mann asked.

Written by Ted Reed in Charlotte, N.C.

To contact this writer, click here.

Follow @tedreednc

Delta Draws Blood in Seattle as Analyst Cuts Alaska's Rating - TheStreet
flyawAAy is offline  
Old 12-09-2013, 05:37 AM
  #54  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by gooddeal

Delta has put enough pressure on United to reduce international footprint so they are now king of the international gateway.
Not really. UAL has moved more into SFO.. DAL has moved out of there. Everybody is picking a dance partner wrt west coast hubs. AMR is the only one of the three that really doesn't have one. THAT is gonna be interesting.
tsquare is offline  
Old 12-09-2013, 05:38 AM
  #55  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by buzzpat
Or, you can't dance with everyone if you want to go home with someone. Painting your jets was never the issue. Sleeping with DAL, AA, and Emirates is a huge issue. You're small, we're not. You're a niche carrier, we're not. Cheat and you're gonna pay. Nothing personal.
This^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
tsquare is offline  
Old 12-09-2013, 05:41 AM
  #56  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by flyawAAy
Delta Draws Blood in Seattle as Analyst Cuts Alaska's Rating
BY Ted Reed| 12/09/13 - 06:45 AM EST
Stock quotes in this article: ALK, DAL

inShare
Comment0
Find out if (ALK) is in Cramer's Portfolio.
SEATTLE(TheStreet) -- As the David and Goliath battle between Alaska Airlines (ALK_) and Delta (DAL_) for dominance at Seattle Tacoma International Airport continues to ratchet up, Delta seems to have drawn first blood as a leading airline analyst downgraded Alaska because of the conflict.

In a note issued Friday, Deutsche Bank analyst Mike Linenberg downgraded Alaska to sell from hold, noting that Alaska is planning to boost service at Delta's hub in Salt Lake City.

"We view these measures as retaliatory on the part of Alaska in response to Delta's significant growth in its Seattle backyard," Linenberg wrote. "Furthermore, the recent moves by both 'partners' suggest that their long-standing code share and marketing agreements could be unraveling.

"While these actions are negative for both airlines, the fact that Delta is roughly eight times the size of Alaska (i.e. $38 billion of revenue estimated for 2013 vs. Alaska's $5 billion) leads us to believe that Alaska will be disproportionately impacted," he said.



Alaska shares closed Friday at $75.85, down $1.10 on an up day for the market. Shares have risen 71% year-to-date. Linenberg said his 12-month price target is $70. His 2014 per share estimate for the carrier is $5.25, well below the consensus estimate of $6.35.

"We are hopeful that both airlines can resolve their various issues so as to maintain their long-standing partnership," Linenberg said. "We are of the view that that would be a far better outcome than what is in store for next year."

Last week included two Seattle-related announcements by Delta. First, the world's second-biggest airline said it will begin non-stop Seattle-Fairbanks service in May and non-stop Vancouver, Canada, service in June. Also, at historic Boeing Field in Seattle, Delta unveiled a Boeing 737-900 that it named "Spirit of Seattle." Alaska responded on Twitter with a photo of one of its aircraft and this text: "The original 'Spirit of Seattle' a nod to the beautiful city we call home."

On Friday, Alaska seemed to tire of turning the other cheek. It announced it would boost Salt Lake flying in June. New destinations from Salt Lake will include Portland, Ore.; Los Angeles; San Diego; and San Jose. Additionally, Alaska will add a third daily Salt Lake-Seattle flight.

"Salt Lake City has long been a top requested market by our customers and we are pleased to add to our successful Seattle-Salt Lake City flights with additional service from four other West Coast gateways," said Joe Sprague, Alaska vice president of marketing, in a prepared statement.

"This new service connects travelers with Alaska's strong network on the West Coast," he said. "In addition, our customers will enjoy double miles that apply toward elite status in our award-winning Mileage Plan program."

Aviation consultant Bob Mann said the "tit for tat" Alaska/Delta battle may signal an end to the trend toward capacity discipline that the airline industry had demonstrated over the past two years. He noted that Delta is also growing in Boston. The carrier said last month it would add five non-stop destinations from Boston next year.

"With Delta growing in Seattle and Boston, and now Alaska's response in Salt Lake, plus the DCA and LGA slot redistribution to growth-happy carriers (and inevitable competitive responses), when is someone going to write that capacity discipline is officially out the window?" Mann asked.

Written by Ted Reed in Charlotte, N.C.

To contact this writer, click here.

Follow @tedreednc

Delta Draws Blood in Seattle as Analyst Cuts Alaska's Rating - TheStreet

lulz at Bob Mann.....
tsquare is offline  
Old 12-09-2013, 05:41 AM
  #57  
GAME ON!!!!
 
Elmer Fudd's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 131
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
40% of the traffic in the USA is from the NYC/BWI/BOS area to Florida, but Delta ran away from it and gave it to SWA, Air Tran and Jet Blue.
I'm not sure about your 40% figure, and DAL still has a large presence in that market.

As far as "routes" go, NWA used to fly a 330 from MSP nonstop to HNL. The DAL bean counters scrapped that, put the 330 on a LHR route & tripled the yield.

Back in the day, AMR build super hubs in SJC, RDU, STL & BNA......only to dismantle them due to lack of performance. Routes are routes.....profitable routes are the ones that really count.

I'm all in favor of maximizing yield, (i.e. PROFITS), on whatever routes are most profitable. From the latest figures, DAL seems to have a pretty good handle on it.
Elmer Fudd is offline  
Old 12-09-2013, 08:26 AM
  #58  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
OR...perhaps RA wanted to merge, and the Alaska mgt. wouldn't play ball?

Either way, RA's obviously bringing Delta into SEA in a big way.
Timbo,

I don't think your two sentences are exclusive of each other.

RA wants to merge, so he is bringing DAL into SEA in a big way. The AK shareholders will see earnings slip, start selling, the stock price goes down enough, AK either succumbs to the merge or is hostile takeover material. Its a matter of time IMO.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 12-09-2013, 08:35 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hawaii50's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 757 Left
Posts: 1,306
Default

Originally Posted by gooddeal
Only a bankrupt airline (or facing bankruptcy) can be acquired for a steal...Ichan101 economics. Delta wants to throw some SkyWest jets to overlap Alaska routes, that's not going to break the bank.

I found it odd that Delta went after both Boston and Seattle in the same strategy session. When you have money to burn on refineries or large stakes in foreign carriers, I guess you can antagonize the likes of Alaska and JetBlue.

Of course, a fantasy of a 717 fleet out of west coast hubs for Delta is equally puzzling...but I suppose its more refreshing than the usual drabble of pay/union/contract/management quagmire that usually surfaces on this forum (regardless of the thread).
Boston, to me, is just DL getting back where they were before they downsized so heavily there allowing JB to get a foothold in the first place. I also think they want to fill a hole in the network on the West Coast. Why would 717s be a fantasy? Seems like a low risk way of reintroducing the intra West service they after after the Western merger. The competition and end of capacity discipline should be good for employees of all airlines.
Hawaii50 is offline  
Old 12-09-2013, 10:57 AM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
gooddeal's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: Wicked Artsy, Moderately Fartsy
Posts: 194
Default

Originally Posted by Hawaii50
Boston, to me, is just DL getting back where they were before they downsized so heavily there allowing JB to get a foothold in the first place.
No argument there...I would suggest Boston is more in their domestic feed interest than Seattle in terms of total Delta international volume from East Coast outbound.

Originally Posted by Hawaii50
I also think they want to fill a hole in the network on the West Coast. Why would 717s be a fantasy? Seems like a low risk way of reintroducing the intra West service they after after the Western merger.
Again, no argument in filling a hole on the West Coast...just if you are going to fantasize, is the 717 the object of desire? Although Delta already made the lowest risk possible by soliciting SkyWest CRJs and Compass E195s to fly most of these new routes instead of using mainline Delta flight crews.

Originally Posted by Hawaii50
The competition and end of capacity discipline should be good for employees of all airlines.
Completely disagree. In the end, competition usually favors one side, not both. Alaska has held ground when competition has come knocking but I wouldn't say it was good for the employees of the industry. I would say Delta, despite its size would be the same. Capacity discipline has been a cornerstone in successful airline business models to absorb losses in tough economic times. I'm sure these are lessons learned by watching PanAm, Braniff and Eastern go under.

If it is the idea of a hostile takeover by Delta over Alaska, I wonder if it would be akin to AA grabbing TWA and how well that was for the good of the employees?

SkyWest is the biggest winner here...and will continue to be if the large carriers continue to use their resources to wage war. Alaska would not feel the pinch of this surge until 2014Q3 or later since most of this will take effect mid 2014 but SkyWest and their employees will benefit almost immediately. If I were a Delta pilot (or any company's pilot actually), I would be frustrated that management again continues to use guest help to grow the route structure instead of hiring more to grow the company.
gooddeal is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices